Neural response telemetry results with the nucleus 24 contour in a perimodiolar position

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 620-623

  Seidman, Michael D ^a,b   Vivek, Prashant ^a   Dickinson, William ^a  

^a HENRY FORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Division of Otologic/Neurotologic Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implants; Contour electrode; Neural response telemetry; Nucleus 24 contour; Perimodiolar position

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; CONGENITAL DEAFNESS; ELECTRODE; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; NERVE POTENTIAL; NEURAL RESPONSE TELEMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TELEMETRY;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADULT; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COCHLEAR NERVE; COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PRESBYCUSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TELEMETRY;

EID: 22644439163     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000178122.35988.df     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Wackym PA, Firszt JB, Gaggl W, et al. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children. Laryngoscope 2004;114:71-6.
2. Frijns JH, Briaire JJ, Grote JJ. The importance of human cochlear anatomy for the results of modiolus-hugging multi-channel cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:340-9.
3. Rebscher SJ, Heilmann M, Bruszewski W, et al. Strategies to improve electrode positioning and safety in cochlear implants. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1999;46:340-52.
4. Jolly CN, Clopton BM, Spelman FA, et al. Guinea pig auditory nerve response triggered by a high density electrode array. Med Prog Technol 1997;21(Suppl):13-23.
5. Frijns JH, de Snoo SL, Schoonhoven R. Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear Res 1995;87:170-86.
6. Shepherd RK, Hatsushika S, Clark GM. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation. Hear Res 1993;66:108-20.
7. Balkany TJ, Eshraghi AA, Yang N. Modiolar proximity of three perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes. Acta Otolaryngol 2002; 122:363-9.
8. Tykocinski M, Saunders E, Cohen LT, et al. The contour electrode array: safety study and initial patient trials of a new perimodiolar design. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:33-41.
9. Pasanisi E, Vincenti V, Bacciu A, et al. The nucleus contour electrode array: an electrophysiological study. Laryngoscope 2002;112: 1653-6.
10. Aschendorff A, Klenzner T, Richter B, Laszig R. Contour electrodes: surgical approaches and results. In Kubo T, Takahashi Y, Iwaki T, eds. Cochlear Implants: An Update. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kugler Publications, 2002:295-9.
11. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Gantz B. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;88:1385-91.
12. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: parametric data from the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;88: 2205-10.
13. Abbas PJ, Brown CJ, Shallop JK, et al. Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant. Ear Hear 1999;20:45-59.
14. Brown CJ, Hughes ML, Luk B, et al. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear Hear 2000;21:151-63.
15. Shallop JK, Facer GW, Peterson A. Neural response telemetry with the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Laryngoscope 1999;109: 1755-9.
16. Polak M, Hodges AV, King JE, et al. Further prospective findings with compound action potentials from Nucleus 24 cochlear implants. Hear Res 2004;188:104-16.
17. Nadol JB. Quantification of human spiral ganglion cells by serial section reconstruction and segmental density estimates. Am J Otolaryngol 1988;9:47-51.
18. Hinojosa R, Seligsohn R, Lerner SA. Ganglion cell counts in the cochlea of patients with normal audiograms. Acta Otolaryngol 1985;99:8-13.
19. Pauler M, Schuknecht HF, Thornton AR. Correlative studies of cochlear neuronal loss with speech discrimination and pure-tone thresholds. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1986;243:200-6.
20. Pujol R, Rebillard M, Rebillard G. Primary neural disorders in the deaf white cat cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol 1977;83:59-64.
21. Ishii T, Toriyama M. Sudden deafness ith severe loss of cochlear neurons. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1977;86:541-7.
22. Parkinson AJ, Arcaroli J, Staller SJ, et al. The nucleus 24 contour cochlear implant system: adult clinical trial results. Ear Hear 2002;23(1 Suppl):41-8.
23. Saunders E, Cohen L, Aschendorff A, et al. Threshold, comfortable level and impedance changes as a function of electrodemodiolar distance. Ear Hear 2002;23(1 Suppl):28-40.