Guinea pig auditory nerve response triggered by a high density electrode array

Medical Progress through Technology

Volumn 21, Issue SUPPL., 1997, Pages 13-23

  Jolly, Claude N ^a   Clopton, Ben M ^b   Spelman, Francis A ^c   Lineaweaver, Scan K ^b  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

^b University of Washington   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear prostheses; Electrical stimulation; Electrically evoked compound action potentials; High density electrode array; Platinization; Quadrupolar mode

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COCHLEA; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; GUINEA PIG; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; SPIRAL GANGLION; TECHNIQUE;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; ARTIFACTS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COCHLEAR NERVE; COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; DEAFNESS; DENDRITES; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; GUINEA PIGS; MICROELECTRODES; NEURONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REACTION TIME; SPIRAL GANGLION; VESTIBULOCOCHLEAR NERVE;

EID: 0030777468     PISSN: 00476552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Lea AR, Hailey DM. The cochlear implant. A technology for the profoundly deaf. Med Prog Technol 1995; 21(1): 47-52.
2. Spclman FA, Clopton BM, Corbett S, Martyniuk 1, Swanson J, Jolly CJ, Voie A, Clary T, Rodenhiser KL. Focused electric fields in the implanted ear., : Conference on implantable auditory prostheses, Asilomar 1995.
3. Jolly CN, Spelman FA, Clopton BM. Quadrupolar Stimulation for Cochlear Prosthesis: Modeling and Experimental Data, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1996; 43(8): 857-65.
4. Jolly CN. Electrode Configurations And Field Distribution For Cochlear Prostheses: Modeling And Experimental Data. [Dissertation). Seattle (WA): University of Washington, 1996.
5. Jewett DL, Williston JS. Auditory-evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans. Brain 1971; 94(4): 681-96.
6. Glattke TJ. Short latency auditory evoked potentials. University park press, 1983.
7. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Gantz B. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88(3): 1385-91.
8. Mcrzenich MM, White MW. In: 'Functional electrical stimulation', FT Hambretch, JB Reswick, eds. Marcel Dekker, INC. 1977.
9. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: parametric data from the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88(5): 2205-10.
10. Hartmann R, Klinke R. Impulse patterns of auditory nerve fibres to extra- and intracochlear electrical stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl Stockh. 1990; 469: 128-34.
11. Shepherd R, Hatsushika S, Clark G. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation. Hear Res 1993; 66: 108-20
12. Cote K, Gill R. Development of a platinized platinum/iridium electrode for use in vitro. Biomed Eng 1987; 15: 419-26.
13. Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Robinson BK. Characterization of wave 1 of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in the guinea pig.. Hear Res 1993; 69(1-2): 35-44.
14. Brummer S, Robblee L. Criteria for selecting electrodes for electrical stimulation: theoretical and practical considerations. Ann NY Acad Sei 1983; 405: 159-71.
15. Picton TW, Hillyard SA, Krausz HI, Galambos R. Human auditory evoked potentials. I. Evaluation of components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1974; 36(2): 179-90.
16. Busby PA, Whitjord LA, Blarney PJ, Richardson LM, Clark GM. Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the Cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95(5): 2658-69.
17. Stypulkowski PH, van den Hunert C. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. I. Compound action potential recordings. Hear Res 1984; 14(3): 205-23.
18. Clark JW Jr. The origin of biopotentials. Medical instrumentation, Boston: J. G. Webster, 1978
19. Plonsey R. Bioelectric phenomena, with the intro and first chapter by David G. Fleming, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1969.
20. Rosenfalck Poul. Intra- and extracellular potential fields of active nerve and muscle fibres. A physico-mathematical analysis of different models., Copenhagen, Akademisk Forlag, (D.B.K), 1969
21. Miller CA, Woodruff K, Pfingst B. Functional responses from guinea pig with cochlear implants. I Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures. Hear Res 1995; 92(2): 85-99.
22. Smith DW, Finley CC, van den Honert C, Olszyk VB, Konrad KE. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to electrical stimulation in the cat. I. Absolute thresholds. Hear Res 1994; 81(1-2): 1-10.
23. Christensen P. UV lasers: key tools for micromachining, Medical device and diagnostic industry. 1995; 17: 188-192.
24. Rubinstein JT, Spelman FA, Soma M, Suesserman MF. Current density profiles of surface mounted and recessed electrodes for neural prostheses. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1987; 34( 11 ): 86475
25. Morrison D. Schindler RA, Wersall J. A quantitative analysis of the afferent innervation of the organ of corti in guinea pig., Acta Otolaryngol Stockh. 1975; 79(1-2): 11-23.
26. Clopton BM, Jolly CN, Spelman FA, Lineaweaver S. Electrical Monopole and Quadrupole Channel Interaction in the Deafened Guinea Pig Cochlea, Hear Reas. Submitted May 1996.