Further prospective findings with compound action potentials from Nucleus 24 cochlear implants

Hearing Research

Volumn 188, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 104-116

  Polak, Marek ^a   Hodges, Annelle V ^a   King, Jack E ^a   Balkany, Thomas J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory spiral ganglion cell; Cochlear implant; Compound action potential; Electrical stimulation; Neural response telemetry

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC REFLEX; ACTION POTENTIAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BRAIN NUCLEUS; CELL DENSITY; CELL SURVIVAL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; GROWTH; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPIRAL GANGLION; TELEMETRY;

EID: 0842348351     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(03)00309-5     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abbas P.J., Brown C.J., Shallop J.K., Firszt J.B., Hughes M.L., Hong S.H., Staller S.J. Summary of results using Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear. 20:(1):1999;45-59.
2. Balkany T.J., Eshraghi A.A., Yang N. Modiolar proximity of three perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes. Acta Otolaryngol. 122:2002;363-369.
3. Battmer R., Laszig R., Lehnhardt E. Electrically elicited stapedius reflex in cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear. 11:(3):1990;370-374.
4. Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Gantz B. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 39:(3):1990;1385-1391.
5. Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Fryauf-Bertschy H., Delsay D., Gantz B.J. Intraoperative and postoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in Nucleus cochlear implant users: implications for the fitting process. Ear Hear. 15:(2):1994;168-176.
6. Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Gantz B.J. Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Am. J. Otol. 19:(3):1998;320-327.
7. Brown C.J., Hughes M.L., Lopez S.M., Abbas P.J. Relationship between EABR thresholds and levels used to program the CLARION speech processor. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 177:(Suppl.):1999;50-57.
8. Brown C.J., Hughes M.L., Luk B., Abbas P.J., Wolaver A., Gervais J. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear Hear. 2:2000;151-163.
9. Charlet de Sauvage R., Cazalas Y., Erre J.P., Aran J.M. Acoustically derived auditory nerve action potential evoked by electrical stimulation: An estimation of the wavefor of single unit contribution. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73:(2):1983;616-627.
10. Echteler S.M., Nofsinger Y.C. Development of ganglion cell topography in the postnatal cochlea. J. Comp. Neurol. 425:2000;436-446.
11. Franck K.H., Norton S.J. Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential measured with the neural response telemetry capabilities of Cochlear Corporation's CI24M device. Ear Hear. 22:(4):2001;289-299.
12. Hall R.D. Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Hear. Res. 49:(1-2):1990;123-136.
13. Hatsushika S., Shepherd R.K., Clark G.M., Tong I.C., Funasaka S. Dimensions of the scala tympani in the human and cat with reference to cochlear implant. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 99:1990;871-876.
14. Hinojosa R., Seligsohn R., Lerner S.A. Ganglion cell counts in the cochleae of patients with normal audiograms. Acta Otolaryngol. 99:1985;8-13.
15. Hodges A.V., Ruth R.A., Lambert P.R., Balkany T.J. Electric auditory brainstem responses in Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant users. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 120:1994;1093-1099.
16. Hodges A.V., Balkany T.J., Ruth R.A., Lambert P.R., Dolan-Ash M.S., Schloffman J.J. Electrical middle ear muscle reflex: use in cochlear implant programming. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 111:1997;255-261.
17. Hodges, A., Butts, S., King, J., 2003. Electrically elicited stapedius muscle reflexes. Utility in cochlear implant patients. In: Cullingtion, H.E. (Ed.), Cochlear Implants: Objective Measures. Whurr, London, pp. 81-95.
18. Ishii T., Toriyama M. Sudden deafness with severe loss of cochlear neurons. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 86:1977;541-547.
19. Jerger J., Fifer R., Jenkins H., Mecklenburg D. Stapedius reflex to electrical stimulation in a patient with a cochlear implant. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 95:1986;151-157.
20. Jerger J., Chmiel R., Oliver T. Prediction of dynamic range from stapedius reflex in cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear. 9:(1):1988;4-8.
21. Keithley E.M., Schreiber R.C. Frequency map of the spiral ganglion in the cat. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81:1987;1036-1042.
22. Kiang N.Y.S., Liberman M.C., Levine R.A. Auditory-nerve activity in cats exposed to ototoxic drugs and high-intensity sounds. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 85:1976;752-768.
23. Kileny P.R. Use of electrophysiologic measures in the management of children with cochlear implants: brainstem, middle latency, and cognitive (P300) responses. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 12:1991;37-42.
24. Kral A., Hartmann R., Mortazavi D., Klinke R. Spatial resolution of cochlear implant: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents. Hear. Res. 121:1998;11-28.
25. Liberman M.C. The cochlear frequency map for the cat: labeling auditory-nerve fibres of known characteristic frequency. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72:1982;1441-1449.
26. Liberman M.C., Oliver M.E. Morphometry of intracellular labeled neurons of the auditory nerve: correlations with functional properties. J. Comp. Neurol. 223:1984;163-176.
27. Müller M., Ott H., Bruns V. Frequency representation and spiral ganglion cell density in the cochlea of the gerbil Pachyuromys duprasi. Hear. Res. 56:(1-2):1991;191-196.
28. Müller M., Laube B., Burda H., Burns V. Structure and function of the cochlea of the African mole rat (Cryptomys hottentous): evidence for a low frequency acoustic fovea. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 171:1992;469-476.
29. Nadol J.B. Quantification of human spiral ganglion cells by serial section reconstruction and segmental density estimates. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 9:1988;47-51.
30. Pauler M., Schuknecht H.F., Thorton A.R. Correlative studies of cochlear neuronal loss with speech discrimination and pure tone thresholds. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 243:1986;200-206.
31. Pujol R., Rebillard M., Rebillard G. Primary neural disorders in the deaf white cat cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol. 83:1977;59-64.
32. Richter B., Aschendorff A., Lohnstein P., Husstedt H., Nagursky H., Laszig R. The Nucleus contour electrode array: a radiological and histological study. Laryngoscope. 111:(3):2001;508-514.
33. Shallop J.K., Beiter A.L., Goin D.W., Mischke R.E. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR) and middle latency responses (EMLR) obtained from patients with the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Ear Hear. 15:(1):1990;5-15.
34. Spivak L.G., Chute P.M. The relationship between electrical acoustic reflex thresholds and behavioral comfort levels in children and adult cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear. 19:(2):1994;184-192.
35. Spivak L.G., Chute P.M., Popp A.L., Parisier S.C. Programming the cochlear implant based on electrical acoustic reflex thresholds: patient performance. Laryngoscope. 104:1994;1225-1230.
36. Spoendlin H. Retrograde degeneration of the cochlear nerve. Acta Otolaryngol. 79:1975;266-275.
37. Spoendlin H. Factors inducing retrograde degeneration of the cochlear nerve. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 93:1984;76-82.
38. Stephan K., Welzl-Müller K. Post-operative stapedius reflex tests with simultaneous loudness scaling in patients supplied with cochlear implants. Audiology. 1:2000;13-18.
39. Stypulkowski P.H., Van den Honert C. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. I. Compound action potential recordings. Hear. Res. 14:(3):1984;205-223.
40. Tykocinski M., Saunders E., Cohen L.T., Treaba C., Briggs R.J., Gibson P., Clark G.M., Cowan R.S. The contour electrode array: safety study and initial patient trials of a new perimodiolar design. Otol. Neurotol. 1:2001;33-41.
41. Van den Honert C., Stypulkowski P.H. Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. Hear. Res. 29:(2-3):1987;195-206.
42. Zhu X., Cao K., Pan T., Yang H., Wang Y. Electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potentials in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi (J. Clin. Otorhinolaryngol.). 1:2002;5-8.
43. Zimmermann C.E., Burgess B.J., Nadol J.B. Patterns of degeneration in the human cochlear nerve. Hear. Res. 90:1995;192-201.