Institutional analysis of technical innovation;Institutionelle analyse technischer innovation

Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2005, Pages

  Werle, Raymund ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIETIES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coevolution; Institutional Theory; National System of Innovation; Sociology of Technology; Technical Innovation; Varieties of Capitalism

Indexed keywords

EID: 22644436977     PISSN: 00232653     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11577-005-0152-2     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. Amable, Bruno, 2000: Institutional Complementarity and Diversity of Social Systems of Innovation and Production. Review of International Political Economy 7: 645-687.
2. Archibugi, Daniele und Mario Planta, 1992: The Technological Specialization of Advanced Countries. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Bender, Gerd (Hg.), 2001: Neue Formen der Wissenserzeugung. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
4. Breschi, Stefano, und Franco Malerba, 1997: Sectoral Innovation Systems: Technological Regimes, Schumpeterian Dynamics, and Spatial Boundaries. S. 130-156 in: Charles Edquist (Hg.), Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter.
5. Carlsson, Bo, 1994: Technological Systems and Economic Performance. S. 13-24 in: Mark Dodgson und Roy Rothwell (Hg.), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
6. Carlsson, Bo, Staffan Jacobsson, Manus Holmen und Annika Rickne, 2002: Innovation Systems: Analytical and Methodological Issues. Research Policy 31: 233-245.
7. Casper, Steven, und Catherine Matraves, 2003: Institutional Frameworks and Innovation in the German and UK Pharmaceutical Industry. Research Policy 32: 1865-1897.
8. Casper, Steven, und Henrik Glimstedt, 2001: Economic Organization, Innovation Systems and the Internet. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 17: 265-281.
9. Casper, Steven, 2000: Institutional Adaptiveness, Technology Policy and the Diffusion of New Business Models: The Case of German Biotechnology. Organization Studies 21: 887-914.
10. Casper, Steven, Mark Lehrer und David Soskice, 1999: Can High-Technology Industries Prosper in Germany? Institutional Frameworks and the Evolution of the German Software and Biotechnology Industries. Industry and Innovation 6: 5-24.
11. Castilla, Emilio J., Hokyu Hwang, Ellen Granovetter und Mark Granovetter, 2000: Social Networks in Silicon Valley. S. 218-247 in: Chong-Moon Lee, William F. Miller, Marguerite Gong Hancock und Henry S. Rowen (Hg.), The Silicon Valley Edge. A Habitat for Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
12. Chandler, Alfred D., 1977: The Visible Hand. The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
13. Coriat, Benjamin, und Olivier Weinstein, 2002: Organizations, Firms and Institutions in the Generation of Innovation. Research Policy 31: 273-290.
14. Crouch, Colin, 2003: Institutions within which Real Actors Innovate. S. 71-98 in: Renate Mayntz und Wolfgang Streeck (Hg.), Die Reformierbarkeit der Demokratie. Innovationen und Blockaden. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
15. Dolata, Ulrich, 2003: Unternehmen Technik. Akteure, Interaktionsmuster und strukturelle Kontexte der Technikentwicklung: ein Theorierahmen. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
16. Dosi, Giovanni, 1982: Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories.
17. Dost, Giovanni, 1988: Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation. Journal of Economic Literature 26: 1120-1171.
18. Edquist, Charles, und Bengt-Åke Lundvall, 1993: Comparing the Danish and the Swedish Systems of Innovations. S. 265-298 in: Richard R. Nelson (Hg.), National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Edquist, Charles, 1997: Systems of Innovation Approaches. Their Emergence and Characteristics. S. 1-35 in: Den. (Hg.), Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter.
20. Faber, Jan, und Barbara Hesen, 2004: Innovation Capabilities of European Nations. Cross-national Analyses of Patents and Sales of Product Innovations. Research Policy 33: 193-207.
21. Freeman, Christopher, und Carlota Perez, 1988: Structural Crises of Adjustment, Business Cycles and Investment Behaviour. S. 38-66 in: Dosi, Giovanni, Christopher Freeman, Richard R. Nelson, Gerald Silverberg und Luc Soete (Hg.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter.
22. Freeman, Christopher, und Francisco Louçã, 2002: As Time Goes By. From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Freeman, Christopher, 1987: Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
24. Gallini, Nancy T., 2002: The Economics of Patents: Lessons from Recent US Patent Reform. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16: 131-154.
25. Geels, Frank W, 2005: Technological Transitions and System Innovations. A Co-Evolutionary and Socio-Technical Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
26. Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott und Martin Trow, 1994: The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
27. Giesecke, Susanne, 2001: Von der Forschung zum Markt. Innovationsstrategien und Forschungspolitik in der Biotechnologie. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
28. Graham, Stuart J.H., und David C. Mowery, 2003: Intellectual Property in the US Software Industry. S. 219-258 in: Wesley M. Cohen und Stephen A. Merrill (Hg.), Patents in the Knowledge Based Economy. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press.
29. Guerrieri, Paolo, 1999: Patterns of National Specialisation in the Global Competitive Environment. S. 139-159 in: Daniele Archibugi, Jeremy Howells und Jonathan Mitcbie(Hg.), Innovation Policy in a Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Hau, Bronwyn H., und Rosemarie Ham Ziedonis, 2001: The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the US Semiconductor Industry, 1979-1995. RAND Journal of Economics 32: 101-128.
31. Hall, Peter A., und David Soskice, 2001: An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. S. 1-70 in: Dies. (Hg.), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Heller, Michael A., und Rebecca S. Eisenberg, 1998: Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedial Research. Science 280: 698-701.
33. Hirsch-Kreinsen, Hartmut, 2002: Unternehmensnetzwerkc - revisited, Corporate Networks - revisited. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 31: 106-124.
34. Hoüingsworth, J. Rogers, und Robert Boyer, 1997: Coordination of Economic Actors and Social Systems of Production. S. 1-47 in: Dies. (Hg.), Contemporary Capitalism. The Embeddedness of Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Hollingsworth, J. Rogers, 2000: Doing Institutional Analysis: Implications for the Study of Innovations. Review of International Political Economy 7: 595-644.
36. Hughes, Thomas P., 1982: Conservative and Radical Technologies. S. 31-44 in: Sven B. Lundstedt und E. William Colglazier (Hg.), Managing Innovation. New York: Pergamon Press.
37. Hughes, Thomas P., 1983: Networks of Power. Electrification in Western Society 1880-1930. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
38. Jaffe, Adam B., 2000: The US Patent System in Transition: Policy Innovation and the Innovation Process. Research Policy 29: 531-557.
39. Jansen, Dorothea, 2002: Netzwerkansätze in der Organisationsforschung. S. 88-118 in: Jutta Allmendinger und Thomas Hinz (Hg.), Organisationssoziologie. Sonderheft 42 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
40. Kitschelt, Herbert, und Wolfgang Streeck, 2003: From Stability to Stagnation: Germany at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century. West European Politics 26: 1-32.
41. Kitschelt, Herbert, 1991: Industrial Governance Structures. Innovation Strategies and the Case of Japan: Sectoral or Cross-National Comparative Analysis? International Organization 45: 453493.
42. Kowol, Uli, und Wolfgang Krohn, 1995: Innovationsnetzwerke. Ein Modell der Technikgenese. S. 77-105 in: Jost Halfmann, Gotthard Bechmann und Werner Rammen (Hg.), Technik und Gesellschaft. Jahrbuch 8: Theoriebausteine der Techniksoziologie. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
43. Krücken, Georg, und Frank Meier, 2003: "Wir sind alle überzeugte Netzwerktäter" - Netzwerke als Formalstruktur und Mythos der Innovationsgesellschaft. Soziale Welt 54: 71-92.
44. Küpfers, Günter, 2002: Complexity, Self-Organisation and Innovation Networks: A New Theoretical Approach. S. 22-52 in: Andreas Pyka und Günter Küppers (Hg.), Innovation Networks. Theory and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
45. Larédo, Philippe, und Philippe Mustar (Hg.), 2001: Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy. An International Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
46. Leydesdorff, Loet, und Henry Etzkowitz, 1998: The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies. Science and Public Policy 25: 195-203.
47. Lundvall, Bengt-Åke, 1992: User-Producer Relationships, National Systems of Innovation and Internationalisation. S. 45-67 in: Bengt-Åke Lundvall (Hg.), National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
48. Lundvall, Bengt-Åke, Björn Johnson, Esben S. Andersen und Bent Dalum, 2002: National Systems of Production, Innovation and Competence Building. Research Policy 31: 213-231.
49. Lütz, Susanne, 2003: Governance in der politischen Ökonomie, MPIfG Discussion Paper 3/2003. Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.
50. Mayntz, Renate, und Thomas P. Hughes (Hg.), 1988: The Development of Large Technological Systems. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
51. Mayntz, Renate, 1993: Große technische Systeme und ihre gesellschaftstheoretische Bedeutung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 45: 97-108.
52. Mowery, David C., und Nathan Rosenberg, 1993: The U.S. National Innovation System. S. 29-75 in: Richard R. Nelson (Hg.), National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53. Mowery, David C., und Timothy Simcoe, 2002: The Internet. S. 229-264 in: Benn Steil, David G. Victor und Richard R. Nelson (Hg.), Technological Innovation and Economic Performance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
54. Mowery, David C., 1994: Science and Technology Policy in Interdependent Economies. Boston: Kluwer.
55. Nelson, Richard R., und Nathan Rosenberg, 1993: Technical Innovation and National Systems. S. 321 in: Richard R. Nelson (Hg.), National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Nelson, Richard R., und Sidney G. Winter, 1982: An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Belknap.
57. Nelson, Richard R., 1987: Understanding Technical Change as an Evolutionary Process. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
58. Nelson, Richard R., 1988: Institutions Supporting Technical Change in the United States. S. 312329 in: Giovanni Dosi, Christopher Freemann, Richard R. Nelson, Gerald Silverberg und Luc Soete (Hg.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter.
59. Nelson, Richard R., 1994: The Coevolution of Technologies and Institutions. S. 139-156 in: Richard W. England (Hg.), Evolutionary Concepts in Contemporary Economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
60. Owen-Smith, Jason, Massimo Riccaboni, Fabio Pammolli und Walter W. Powell, 2004: A Comparison of US and European University-Industry Relations in the Life Science. Management Science 48: 24-43.
61. Pavitt, Keith, und Parimal Patel, 1999: Global Corporations and National Systems of Innovations: Who Dominates Whom? In: Daniele Archibugi, Jeremy Howells und Jonathan Mitchie (Hg.), Innovation Policy in a Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 94-119.
62. Perrow, Charles, 1984: Normal Accidents, Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books.
63. Podolny, Joel M., und Karen L. Page, 1998: Network Forms of Organization. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 57-76.
64. Porter, Michael E., 1990: The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.
65. Powell, Walter W., 1990: Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization. S. 295336 in: Research in Organizational Behavior 12.
66. Powell, Walter W., Douglas R. White, Kenneth W. Koput und Jason Owen-Smith, 2005: Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences. American Journal of Sociology 110 (4): 1132-1205.
67. Rammert, Werner, 1995: Regeln der technikgenetischen Methode. S. 13-50 in: Jost Halfmann, Gotthard Bechmann und Werner Rammert (Hg.), Technik und Gesellschaft. Jahrbuch 8: Theoriebausteine der Techniksoziologie. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
68. Rammert, Werner, 1997: Innovation im Netz. Neue Zeiten für technische Innovationen: Heterogen verteilt und interaktiv vernetzt. Soziale Welt 48: 397-415.
69. Research Policy 11: 147-162.
70. Riccaboni, Massimo, Walter W. Powell, Fabio Pammoli und Jason Owen-Smith 2003: Public Research and Industrial Innovation: A Comparison of US and European Innovation Systems in the Life Sciences. S. 169-201 in: Aldo Geuna, Amman J. Salter und W. Edward Steinmueller (Hg.), Science and Innovation. Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
71. Rip, Arie, und René Kemp, 1998: Technological Change. S. 327-399 in: Steve Rayner und Elizabeth L. Malone (Hg.), Human Choice and Climate Change. Two: Resources and Technology. Columbus, OH: Batelie Press.
72. Rosenkopf, Lori, und Michael L. Tushman, 1994: The Coevolution of Technology and Organization. S. 403-424 in: Joel A.C. Baum und Jitendra V. Singh (Hg.), Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73. Schneider, Volker, 2001: Die Transformation der Telekommunikation, Vom Staatsmonopol zum globalen Markt (1800-2000). Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
74. Schulz-Schaeffer, Ingo, 2000: Sozialtheorie der Technik. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
75. Soskice, David, 1994: Innovation Strategies of Companies: A Comparative Institutional Approach of Some Cross-Country Differences. S. 271-189 in: Wolfgang Zapf und Meinolf Dierkes (Hg.), Institutionenvergleich und Institutionendynamik. WZB-Jahrbuch 1994. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
76. Soskice, David, 1999: Divergent Production Regimes: Coordinated and Uncoordinated Market Economics in the 1980s and 1990s. S. 101-134 in: Herbert Kitschelt, Peter Lange, Gary Marks und John D. Stevens (Hg.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Steil, Benn, David G. Victor und Richard R. Nelson (Hg.), 2002: Technological Innovation and Economic Performance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
78. Steil, Benn, David G. Victor und Richard R. Nelson, 2002: Introduction and Overview. S. 3-22 in: Dies. (Hg.), Technological Innovation and Economic Performance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
79. Werle, Raymund, 1998: An Institutional Approach to Technology. Science Studies 11: 3-18.
80. Werle, Raymund, 2000: Innovationspotentiale im Internet - Selbstregelung auf Strukrurebene. S. 141-160 in: Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem (Hg.), Innovation und Telekommunikation. Rechtliche Steuerung von Innovationsprozessen in der Telekommunikation. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
81. Werk, Raymund, 2002: Internet @ Europe: Overcoming Institutional Fragmentation and Policy Failure. S. 137-158 in: Jacint Jordana (Hg.), Governing Telecommunications and the New Information Society in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
82. Weyer, Johannes, Ulrich Kirchner, Lan Riedl und Johannes F.K. Schmidt, 1997: Technik, die Gesellschaft schafft - Soziale Netzwerke als Ort der Technikgenesc. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
83. Wiesenthal, Helmut, 2000: Markt, Organisation und Gemeinschaft als "zweitbeste" Verfahren sozialer Koordination. S. 44-73 in: Raymund Werle und Uwe Schimank (Hg.), Gesellschaftliche Komplexität und kollektive Handlungsfähigkeit. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
84. Williamson, Oliver E. 1985: The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press
85. Windolf, Paul, 2002: Die Zukunft des Rheinischen Kapitalismus. S. 414-442 in: Jutta Allmendinger und Thomas Hinz (Hg.), Organisationssoziologie. Sonderheft 42 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.