Hospital disinfection: Efficacy and safety issues

Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 320-325

  Dettenkofer, Markus ^a   Block, Colin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Cleaning; Disinfection; Environment; Nosocomial infection; Reprocessing; Resistance; Safety

Indexed keywords

BIOCIDE; CHLORINE; DETERGENT; DISINFECTANT AGENT; PEROXYGEN DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; BIOFILM; CLEANING; DISINFECTION; HOSPITAL INFECTION; INFECTION CONTROL; INSTRUMENT STERILIZATION; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; NOROVIRUS; PRION; REVIEW; VIRUS INACTIVATION; VIRUS TRANSMISSION;

EID: 22544467289     PISSN: 09517375     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.qco.0000172701.75278.60     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Disinfection and sterilization in health care facilities: what clinicians need to know. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39:702-709. A well-written comprehension of current aspects, with some focus on US regulations.
2. Spaulding EH. Chemical disinfection and antisepsis in the hospital. J Hosp Res 1972; 9:5-31.
3. Rutala WA, Weber DJ. The benefits of surface disinfection. Am J Infect Control 2004; 32:226-231.
4. Daschner FD, Schuster A, Dettenkofer M, Kummerer K. No routine surface disinfection. Am J Infect Control 2004; 32:513-515.
5. Hota B. Contamination, disinfection, and cross-colonization: are hospital surfaces reservoirs for nosocomial infection? Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39: 1182-1189. A good paper giving an excellent overview; all relevant aspects are addressed, as well as the current state of the pro/contra debate on surface disinfection.
6. Dettenkofer M, Wenzler S, Amthor S, et al. Does disinfection of environmental surfaces influence nosocomial infection rates? A systematic review. Am J Infect Control 2004; 32:84-89. The interesting results of an extensive search in the scientific literature with the somewhat frustrating result that only a few papers report on studies of valuable design.
7. Exner M, Vacata V, Hornei B, et al. Household cleaning and surface disinfection: new insights and strategies. J Hosp Infect 2004; 56:70-75. A nice model to show how cross-contamination can occur during cleaning/ disinfection even when using low-level disinfectants.
8. Chitnis V, Chitnis S, Patil S, Chitnis D. Practical limitations of disinfection of body fluid spills with 10,000 ppm sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Am J Infect Control 2004; 32:306-308.
9. Kampf G, Bloss R, Martiny H. Surface fixation of dried blood by glutaraldehyde and peracetic acid. J Hosp Infect 2004; 57:139-143.
10. Block C. The effect of Perasafe and sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) against spores of Clostridium difficile and Bacillus atrophaeus on stainless steel and polyvinyl chloride surfaces. J Hosp Infect 2004; 57:144-148. A sound laboratory study on an interesting new disinfectant; a profound discussion of the relevant methodological aspects.
11. Wutzier P, Sauerbrei A, Schau HP. Monopercitric acid - a new disinfectant with excellent activity towards clostridial spores. J Hosp Infect 2005; 59:75-76.
12. French GL, Otter JA, Shannon KP, et al. Tackling contamination of the hospital environment by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a comparison between conventional terminal cleaning and hydrogen peroxide vapour decontamination. J Hosp Infect 2004; 57:31-37. An interesting approach with a new technology that needs further study.
13. Johnston MD, Lawson S, Otter JA. Evaluation of hydrogen peroxide vapour as a method for the decontamination of surfaces contaminated with Clostridium botulinum spores. J Microbiol Methods 2005; 60:403-411.
14. Barker J, Vipond IB, Bloomfield SF. Effects of cleaning and disinfection in reducing the spread of Norovirus contamination via environmental surfaces. J Hosp Infect 2004; 58:42-49. A nice study on a very relevant pathogen, its transmission and important preventive aspects.
15. 2-generating gloves. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38:857-863.
16. 2-generating gloves. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39:874-875.
17. 2-generating gloves. Reply to Mattner et al. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39:874-875.
18. Brown SA, Merritt K, Woods TO, Busick DN. Effects on instruments of the World Health Organization - recommended protocols for decontamination after possible exposure to transmissible spongiform encephalopathycontaminated tissue. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005; 72: 186-190.
19. Lemmer K, Mielke M, Pauli G, Beekes M. Decontamination of surgical instruments from prion proteins: in vitro studies on the detachment, destabilization and degradation of PrPSc bound to steel surfaces. J Gen Virol 2004; 85:3805-3816. The results of this well-performed study are helpful for the further assessment of less harmful methods in prion decontamination.
20. Fichet G, Comoy E, Duval C, et al. Novel methods for disinfection of prion-contaminated medical devices. Lancet 2004; 364:521-526. A sound study of novel methods; promising results that might in future help to solve the costly problem of how to decontaminate prions.
21. Cullen MM, Trail A, Robinson M, et al. Serratia marcescens outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit prompting review of decontamination of laryngoscopes. J Hosp Infect 2005; 59:68-70.
22. Stahl WE, Johansson E, Hakanson H. Cross-contamination in dishwashers. J Hosp Infect 2004; 56:312-317.
23. Martiny H, Floss H, Zuhlsdorf B. The importance of cleaning for the overall results of processing endoscopes. J Hosp Infect 2004; 56(Suppl. 2):S16-S22.
24. Lee JH, Rhee PL, Kim JH, et al. Efficacy of electrolyzed acid water in reprocessing patient-used flexible upper endoscopes: comparison with 2% alkaline glutaraldehyde. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 19:897-903.
25. Nose K, Sueyoshi T, Nagano M, et al. High-level disinfection of cystoscopic equipment with ortho-phthalaldehyde solution. J Hosp Infect 2004; 57:346-348.
26. Sattar SA. Microbicides and the environmental control of nosocomial viral infections. J Hosp Infect 2004; 56:64-69. This short review places an excellent perspective on a topic that clinicians should be familiar with.
27. Steinmann J. Surrogate viruses for testing virucidal efficacy of chemical disinfectants. J Hosp Infect 2004; 56:49-54.
28. Payan C, Pivert A, Kampf G, et al. Assessment of new chemical disinfectants for HBV virucidal activity in a cell culture model. J Hosp Infect 2004; 56:58-63. The importance of this study lies in its unique use of a tissue culture model for testing biocides against HBV. Models based on viral growth in vitro have not previously been successful. The findings bear out the idea that HBV, being an enveloped virus, is quite susceptible to a variety of agents.
29. Duizer E, Bijkerk P, Rockx B, et al. Inactivation of caliciviruses. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004; 70:4538-4543.
30. Sauerbrei A, Sehr K, Eichhorn U, et al. Inactivation of human adenovirus genome by different groups of disinfectants. J Hosp Infect 2004; 57: 67-72.
31. Sauerbrei A, Sehr K, Brandstadt A, et al. Sensitivity of human adenoviruses to different groups of chemical biocides. J Hosp Infect 2004; 57:59-66.
32. Kariwa H, Fujii N, Takashima I. Inactivation of SARS coronavirus by means of povidone-iodine, physical conditions, and chemical reagents. Jpn J Vet Res 2004; 52:105-112.
33. Wutzler P, Sauerbrei A. Virucidal activity of the new disinfectant monopercitric acid. Lett Appl Microbiol 2004; 39:194-198.
34. Pajkos A, Vickery K, Cossart Y. Is biofilm accumulation on endoscope tubing a contributor to the failure of cleaning and decontamination? J Hosp Infect 2004; 58:224-229.
35. Vickery K, Pajkos A, Cossart Y. Removal of biofilm from endoscopes: evaluation of detergent efficiency. Am J Infect Control 2004; 32:170-176.
36. Holmes CJ, Degremont A, Kubey W, et al. Effectiveness of various chemical disinfectants versus cleaning combined with heat disinfection on Pseudomonas biofilm in hemodialysis machines. Blood Purif 2004; 22:461-468. This study describes a reasonably sensible model simulating the tubing in the hydraulics modules of dialysis machines. The results stress the importance of the physical removal of biofilm in decontamination (in this case by chemical treatment with an organic acid).
37. Henoun Loukili N, Zink E, Grandadam S, et al. Effectiveness of detergent-disinfecting agents on Escherichia coli 54127 biofilm. J Hosp Infect 2004; 57:175-178. Based on a 'convenience' model (see text), this study was well planned and executed. Measurements of bacterial survival were not taken as the endpoint, but rather colorimetric estimations of residual biofilm stained with crystal violet.
38. Henoun Loukili N, Becker H, Harno J, et al. Effect of peracetic acid and aldehyde disinfectants on biofilm. J Hosp Infect 2004; 58:151-154. See note on previous reference.
39. Theraud M, Bedouin Y, Guiguen C, Gangneux J-P. Efficacy of antiseptics and disinfectants on clinical and environmental yeast isolates in planktonic and biofilm conditions. J Med Microbiol 2004; 53:1013-1018. A complex and essentially well-conducted study that highlights the fact that bacteria are not alone in producing biofilm-related problems.
40. Chandra J, Kuhn DM, Mukherjee PK, et al. Biofilm formation by the fungal pathogen Candida albicans: development, architecture, and drug resistance. J Bacteriol 2001; 183:5385-5394.
41. Sokol WN. Anaphylaxis following cystoscopy caused by Cidex(R)-OPA (ortho-phthalaldehyde) cold sterilization solution. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 113(Suppl. 1):S308. These case reports, among others, underlie a very inconvenient change in practice to institutions that had already made the change from glutaraldehyde to orthophthalaldehyde.
42. Rideout K, Teschke K, Dimich-Ward H, Kennedy SM. Considering risks to healthcare workers from glutaraldehyde alternatives in high-level disinfection. J Hosp Infect 2005; 59:4-11. This study highlights management-related aspects of the educated acquisition and use of biocides. Great gaps are revealed.
43. Lerones C, Mariscal A, Carnero M, et al. Assessing the residual antibacterial activity of clinical materials disinfected with glutaraldehyde, o-phthalaldehyde, hydrogen peroxide or 2-bromo-2-nitro-1,3-propanediol by means of a bacterial toxicity assay. Clin Microbiol Infect 2004; 10:984-989. This study deals with one aspect of the not-only-theoretical potential for unwittingly causing unnecessary toxicity to patients.
44. Ryan CK, Potter GD. Disinfectant colitis. Rinse as well as you wash. J Clin Gastroenterol 1995; 21:6-9.
45. Kummerer K. Drugs in the environment: emission of drugs, diagnostic aids and disinfectants into wastewater by hospitals in relation to other sources - a review. Chemosphere 2001; 45:957-969.
46. Kummerer K. Resistance in the environment. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004; 54:311-320. A wide-ranging review that skilfully encompasses issues of the release of antimicrobial agents after their use in medicine, veterinary medicine and animal husbandry, fish farming etc., their unknown effect on environmental organisms and their secondary role in determining the frequency of resistance in the environment.
47. Nomura K, Ogawa M, Miyamoto H, et al. Antibiotic susceptibility of glutaraldehyde-tolerant Mycobacterium chelonae from bronchoscope washing machines. Am J Infect Control 2004; 32:185-188.
48. Russell AD. Bacterial adaptation and resistance to antiseptics, disinfectants and preservatives is not a new phenomenon. J Hosp Infect 2004; 57:97-104. An excellent review discussing all aspects of an upcoming and very relevant issue. This is especially true with respect to the increasing, however uncritical use of biocides in many consumer products.
49. Schuster A, Frank U, Daschner FD. Persistent silver disinfectant for the environment: myth and reality. Am J Infect Control 2004; 32:309-311.
50. Sekiguchi J, Hama T, Fujino T, et al. Detection of the antiseptic- and disinfectant-resistance genes qacA, qacB, and qacC in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated in a Tokyo hospital. Jpn J Infect Dis 2004; 57:288-291. This paper adds interesting scientific data to an (up to now) not widely recognized aspect of the MRSA problem.