Employees' overall perception of HRM effectiveness

Human Relations

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 523-544

  Chang, Eunmi ^a  

^a Department of Innovation and Entrepreneurial Marketing   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Commitment HR bundle; Organizational commitment; Overall perception; Procedural justice

Indexed keywords

EID: 22544442813     PISSN: 00187267     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018726705055037     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Ambrose, M. & Cropanzano, R. A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: An examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88, 266-75.
2. Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P. & Kalleberg, A. Manufacturing advantage: Why high performance work systems pay off. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000.
3. Arthur, J. Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37, 670-87.
4. Bae, J. & Lawler, J. Organizational and HRM strategies in Korea: Impact on firm performance in an emerging economy. Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43, 502-17.
5. Baron, R. & Kenny, D. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51, 1173-82.
6. Becker, B. & Huselid, M. High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 1998, 16, 53-101.
7. Campbell, D., Campbell, K. & Chia, H. Merit pay, performance appraisal, and individual motivation: An analysis and alternative. Human Resource Management, 1998, 37, 131-46.
8. Chang, E. Career commitment as a complex moderator of organizational commitment and turnover intention. Human Relations, 1999, 52, 1257-78.
9. Chang, E. Effects of individual performance based compensation in Korean companies: In the context of commitment HR bundles. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Washington, DC, August 2001.
10. Chang, E. Composite effects of extrinsic motivation on work effort: Case of Korean employees. Journal of World Business, 2003, 38, 70-9.
11. Cohen, B. Explaining psychological statistics. New York: Wiley, 2001.
12. Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D., Mohler, C. & Schminke, M. Three roads to organizational justice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 2001, 20, 1-113.
13. Delaney, J. & Huselid, M. The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39, 949-69.
14. Delery, J. & Doty, D. Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39, 802-35.
15. Fishbein, M. An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object. Human Relations, 1963, 16, 233-40.
16. Folger, R. & Konovsky, M. Effect of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 1989, 32, 115-30.
17. Gardner, M. Does attitude toward the Ad affect brand attitude under a brand evaluation set? Journal of Marketing Research, 1985, 22, 192-8.
18. Gardner, T., Moynihan, L., Park, H. & Wright, P. Beginning to unlock the black box in the HR firm performance relationship: The impact of HR practices on employee attitude and employee outcomes. Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies, Cornell University, Working Paper 2001, 01-12.
19. Gartner, K. & Nollen, S. Career experiences, perceptions of employment practices and psychological commitment to the organization. Human Relations, 1989, 42, 975-91.
20. Greenberg, J. Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986, 71, 340-2.
21. Greenberg, J. Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 1990, 16, 399-432.
22. Guthrie, J. High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44, 180-90.
23. Hofmann, D., Griffin, M. & Gavin, M. The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In K. Klein & S. Kozlowski (Eds), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
24. Hofstede, G. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
25. Huselid, M. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38, 635-72.
26. Jawahar, I. A model of organizational justice and workplace aggression. Journal of Management, 2002, 28, 811-34.
27. Korgaard, M. & Roberson, L. Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions. Journal of Management, 1995, 21, 657-69.
28. Kossek, E. & Block, R. New employment relations: Challenges and basic assumptions. In E. Kossek & R. Block (Eds), Managing human resources in the 21st century: From core concepts to strategic choice. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College, 2000.
29. Lord, R. An information processing approach to social perceptions, leadership and behavioral measurement in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1985, 7, 87-128.
30. MacDuffie, J. Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1995, 48, 197-221.
31. McFarlin, D. & Sweeney, P. Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 1992, 35, 626-37.
32. Meyer, J. &c Allen, M. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resources Management, 1991, 1, 61-89.
33. Moorman, R. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviours: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991, 76, 845-55.
34. Pfeffer, J. The human equation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
35. Pil, F. & MacDuffie, J. The adoption of high-involvement work places. Industrial Relations, 1996, 35, 423-55.
36. Podsakoff, P. & Organ, D. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 1986, 12, 531-44.
37. Price, J. & Mueller, C. Absenteeism and turnover of hospital employees. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1986.
38. Ryan, M. & Bonfield, E. Fishbein's intentions model: A test of external and ragmatic validity. Journal of Marketing, 1980, 44, 82-95.
39. Skarlicki, D. & Folger, R. Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997, 50, 617-33.
40. Sobel, M. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982.