Recent views on the status, delineation and classification of the annelida

American Zoologist

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 953-964

  Rouse, Greg W ^a,b   Fauchald, Kristian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22444452520     PISSN: 00031569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/38.6.953     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Aguinaldo, A. M. A., J. M. Turbeville, L. S. Linford, M. C. Rivera, J. R. Garey, R. A. Raff, and J. A. Lake. 1997. Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals. Nature 387:489-493.
2. Backeljau, T., B. Winnepenninckx, and L. DeBruyn, 1993. Cladistic analysis of metazoan relationships: A reappraisal. Cladistics 9:167-181.
3. Baltzer, F. 1925. Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung und Geschkechtsbetimmung der Bonellia. Pubbl. Staz. zool. Napoli 6:223-286.
4. Bartolomaeus, T. 1995. Structure and formation of the uncini in Pectinaria koreni, Pectinaria aiiricoma (Terebellida) and Spirorbis spirorbis (Sabellida): implications for annelid phytogeny and the position of the Pogonophora. Zoomorphology 115: 161-177.
5. Bartolomaeus, T. 1997. Chaetogenesis in polychaetous Annelida-significance for annelid systematics and the position of the Pogonophora. ZoologyAnal. Compl. Syst. 100:348-364.
6. Dales, R. P. 1962. The polychaete stomadeum and the interrelationships of the families of the Polychaeta..Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 139:289-328.
7. Dales, R. P. 1977. The polychaete stomodeum and phytogeny. In D. J. Reish and K. Fauchald (eds.), Essays on polychaetous annelids in memory of Dr. Olga Hartman, pp. 525-546. Allan Hancock Foundation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
8. Day, J. H. 1967o. A monograph on the Polychaeta of southern Africa, Part I, Errantia. British Museum (Natural History), London.
9. Day, J. H. 1967&. A monograph on the Polychaeta of Southern Africa, Part II, British Museum (Natural History), London.
10. De Queiroz, A., M. J. Donoghue, and J. Kim. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:657-681.
11. Eernisse, D., J. S. Albert, and F. E. Anderson. 1992. Annelida and Arthropoda are not sister taxa: A phylogenetic analysis of spiralian metazoan morphology. Syst. Biol. 41:305-330.
12. Eernisse, D. J. 1997. Arthropod and annelid relationships re-examined. In R. A. Fortey and R. H. Thomas (eds.), Arthropod relationships, pp. 4356. Chapman & Hall, London.
13. Eibye-Jacobsen, D. and C. Nielsen. 1996. The rearticulation of annelids. Zool. Sen 25:275-282.
14. Fauchald, K. 1974. Polychaete phylogeny: A problem in protostome evolution. Syst. Zool. 23:493-506.
15. Fauchald, K. 1977. The polychaete worms. Definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles County. Sei. Ser. 28:1188.
16. Fauchald, K. and G. W. Rouse. 1997. Polychaete systematics: Past and present. Zool. Scr. 26:71-138.
17. Fauvel, P. 1923. Polychète Errantes. Faune Fr. 5:1488.
18. Fauvel, P. 1927. Polychètes sédentaires. Addenda aux Errantes, Archiannelides, Myzostomaires. Faune Fr. 16:1-494.
19. Giangrande, A. and M. C. Gambi. 1998. Metamerism and life-style within polychaetes: Morpho-functional aspects and evolutionary implications. Ital. J. Zool. 65:39-50.
20. Giribet, G. and C. Ribera. 1998. The position of arthropods in the animal kingdom: A search for a reliable outgroup for internal arthropod phylogeny. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 9:481-488.
21. Gustus, R. M. and R. A. Cloney. 1972. Ultrastructural similarities between setae of brachiopods and polychaetes. Acta Zool., (Stockh.) 53:229-233.
22. Halanych, K. M., J. D. Bachelier, A. M. A. Aguinaldo, S. M. Liva, D. M. Hillis, and J. A. Lake. 1995. Evidence from 18S ribosomal DNA that the lophophorates are protostome animals. Science 267: 1641-1643.
23. Hartman, O. 1968. Alias of the erranliate polychaelous annelids from California. Allan Hancock Foundation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
24. Hartman, O. 1969. Atlas of the sedentariate polychaelous annelids from California. Allan Hancock Foundation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
25. Hartmann-Schroder, G. 1971. Annelida, Borstenwiirmer, Polychaeta. Tierwelt Dtl. 58:1-594.
26. Hartmann-Schroder, G. 1996. Annelida, Borstemviinner, Polychaeta. Gustav Fischer, Jena.
27. Hatschek, B. 1880. Über Entwicklung von Echiurus und die systematische Stellung der Echiuridae (Gephyrei chaetiferi). Arb. zool. Inst. Univ. Wien 3:1-34.
28. Hemplemann, F. 1931. Erste und zweite Klasse der Vermes Polymera (Annelida). Archiannelida und Polychaeta. In Kükentahal W. and T. Krumbach (eds.), Handbuch der Zoologie, Band 2, Teil 2, Leif 12u. 13., pp. 1-112. Berlin.
29. Jägersten, G. 1940. Zur Kenntnis der Morphologie, Entwicklung und Taxonomie der Myzostomida. Nova Acta R. Soc. Scient, upsal. 11:1-84.
30. Jones, M. L. 1985. On the Vestimentifera, new phylum: Six new species, and other taxa, from hydrothermal vents and elsewhere. Bull. Biol. Soc. Wash. 6:117-158.
31. Kluge, A. G. 1997. Testability and the refutation and corroboration of cladistic hypotheses. Cladistics 13:81-96.
32. Kojima, S. 1998. Paraphyletic status of Polychaeta suggested by phylogenetic analysis based on the amino acid sequences of Elongation Factor 1-alpha. Mol. Phylo. Evol. 9:255-261.
33. McHugh, D. 1997. Molecular evidence that echiurans and pogonophorans are derived annelids. Proc. Natn. Acad. Sei. U.S.A. 94:8006-8009.
34. Minelli, A. and S. Bortoletto. 1988. Myriapod segmentation and arthropod segmentation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 33:323-343.
35. Nevvby, W. W. 1940. The embryology of the echiuroid worm Urechis caupo. Mem. Am. Phil. Soc. 16:1219.
36. Nielsen, C. 1995. Animal evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
37. Nielsen, C., N. Scharff, and D. Eibye-Jacobsen, 1996. Cladistic analyses of the animal kingdom. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 57:385-410.
38. Nixon, K. C. and J. M. Carpenter. 1993. On outgroups. Cladistics 9:413-426.
39. Omodeo, P. 1998. History of the Clitellata. Ital. J. Zool. 65:51-73.
40. Pettibone, M. H. 1982. Annelida. In S. P. Parker (ed.), Synopsis and classification of living organisms, Vol. 2., pp. 1-43, McGraw-Hill Book Co, New York.
41. Pilger, J. E 1993. Echiura. In E W. Harrison and M. E. Rice (eds.). Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates, Vol. 12, Onychophora, Chilopoda and lesser Protostomata, pp. 185-236. Wiley-Liss, New York.
42. Pinna de, M. C. C. 1991. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics 7: 367-394.
43. Pleijel, F. 1995. On character coding for phylogeny reconstruction. Cladistics 11:309-315.
44. Prenant, M. 1959. Classe des Myzostomides. In P. P Grasse (éd.). Traité de Zoologie, Anatomie, Systématique, Biologie. V (1). Annelides-Sipunculiens-Echiuriens-Priapuliens-EndoproctesPlior onidiens. pp. 714-784. Massen et Cie, Paris.
45. Purschkc, G. 1997. Ultrastructure of the nuchal organs in polychaetes (Annelida)-new results and review. Acta Zool. 78:123-143.
46. Quatrefages de, A. 1866. Histoire Naturelle des Annéles marine et d'eau douce. Annélides et Géphyriens. Librarie Encyclopédique de Roret, Paris.
47. Rouse, G. W. 1997. Rearticulating with extra assumptions: A response to Eibye-Jacobsen and Nielsen. Zool. Scri. 26:61-66.
48. Rouse, G. W. and K. Fauchald. 1995. The articulation of annelids. Zool. Scr. 24:269-301.
49. Rouse, G. W. and K. Fauchald. 1997. Cladistics and polychaetes. Zool. Scr. 26:139-204.
50. Schräm, F. R. 1991. Cladistic analysis of metazoan phyla and the placement of fossil problematica. In A. M. Simonetta and S. Conway Morris (eds.), The early evolution of Metazoa and the significance of problematic taxa., pp. 35-46. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
51. Schräm, F. R. and W. N. Ellis. 1994. Metazoan relationships-a rebuttal. Cladistics 10:331-337.
52. Schroeder, P. C. and C. O. Hermans. 1975. Annelida: Polychaeta. In Giese A. C. and J. S. Pearse (eds.), Reproduction of marine invertebrates, III, annelids and echiurans., pp. 1-213. Academic Press, New York.
53. Siddall, M. E. and A. G. Kluge. 1997. Probabilism and phylogenetic inference. Cladistics 13:313-336.
54. Southward, E. C. 1988. Development of the gut and segmentation of newly settled stages of Ridgeia (Vestimentifera): implications for relationship between Vestimentifera and Pogonophora. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 68:465-487.
55. Swofford, D. L. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.
56. Swofford, D. L., G. J. Olsen, P. J. Waddell, and D. M. Hillis. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In Hillis D. M., C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable (eds.), Molecular systematics, pp. 407-514. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
57. Torrey, J. C. 1903. The early embryology of Thalassema mellita (Conn). Annals N.Y. Acad. Sei. 14: 165-246.
58. Uschakov, P. V. 1955. Polychaeta of the Far Eastern Seas of the U.S.S.R. 56:1-433 (translated from Russian by the Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem 1965).
59. Westheide, W. 1997. The direction of evolution within the Polychaeta. J. Nat. Hist. 31:1-15.
60. Westheide, W., D. McHugh, G. Purschke, and G. W. Rouse. 1999. Systematization of the Annelida: Different approaches. Hydrobiologia (In press)