Teacher-pupil interaction: A study of hidden beliefs in conclusion phases

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 935-956

  Morge, Ludovic ^a  

^a Institut Universitaire de Formation des Ma tres de Clermont Ferrand   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22444445223     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500690500068600     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bachelard, G. (1938). La formation de l'esprit scientifique [The Formation of the Scientific Mind]. Paris: Vrin.
2. Brickhouse, N.W. (1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 53-62.
3. Briscoe, C. (1991). The dynamic interactions among beliefs, role metaphors, and teaching practices: a case study of teacher change. Science Education, 75, 185-199.
4. Cameron, L. (2002). Metaphors in the learning of science: a discourse focus. British Educational Research Journal, 28(5), 673-688.
5. Closset, J.L. (1989). Les obstacles à l'apprentissage de l'électrocinétique [Obstacles to learning electrokinetics]. Bulletin de l'Union des Physiciens, 716, 913-950.
6. Désautels, J. Larochelle, M., Gagné, B., & Ruel, F. (1993). La formation à l'enseignement des sciences: le virage épistémologique [Science teaching training: the epistemological turn]. Didaskalia, 1, 49-67.
7. Duffy, J., Warren, K., & Walsh, M. (2001). Classroom interactions: gender of teacher, gender of student, and classroom subject. Sex Roles, 45(9-10), 579-593.
8. Duschl, R.A., & Wright, E. (1989). A case study of high school teachers' decision-making models for planning and teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 467-501.
9. Doise, M., Deschamps, J.C., & Mugny, G. (1978). Psychologie sociale expérimentale [Experimental Social Psychology]. Paris: Armand Colin.
10. El Hajjami, A., Lahlou, F., Benyamma, S., & Tiberghien, A. (1999). Élaboration d'une méthode d'analyse des discours d'enseignants: cas de l'énergie [Establishing a method for analysing teachers' statements: the example of energy]. Didaskalia, 15, 59-86.
11. Flanders, N.A. (1970) Analyzing teaching behavior. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
12. Franceschelli, S., & Weil-Barais A. (1998). La routine conversationnelle comme stratégie de changement conceptuel: apprendre à modéliser en mécanique [The conversational routine as a strategy for conceptual change: learning how to modelize in mechanics]. In A. Dumas-Carré, & A. Weil-Barais (Eds.) Tutelle et médiation dans l'éducation scientifique [Tutoring and Mediation in Science Education] (pp. 163-184). Berne: Peter Lang.
13. Gallagher, J.J. (1991). Prospective and practising secondary school science teachers' knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75, 121-134.
14. Haney, J.J., & McArthur, J. (2002). Four case studies of prospective science teachers' beliefs concerning constructivist teaching practices. Science & Education, 86, 783-802.
15. Hogan, K., & Maglienti, M. (2001). Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students' and scientists' reasoning about conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 663-687.
16. Joshua, S. and Dupin, J.-J. (1989). Représentations et modélisations: le 'débat scientifique' dans la classe et l'apprentissage de la physique [Representation and Modelization: The 'Scientific Discussion' in the Classroom and the learning of Physics]. Berne: Peter Lang.
17. Kaminski, W. (1991). Optique élémentaire en classe de 4ème: raisons et impacts sur les maîtres d'une maquette d'enseignement [Elementary optics in Year 8: The Reasons for a Teaching Prototype for Teachers and its Impact on Them]. Thèse, Université Paris 7.
18. Keys, C.W., & Bryan, L.A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 631-645.
19. Keys, C.W., & Kennedy, V. (1999). Understanding inquiry science teaching in context: a case study of an elementary teacher. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10, 315-333.
20. Kuhn, T.S. (1970/trad. 1983). La structure des révolutions scientifiques [The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]. Paris: Champs Flammarion.
21. Larcher, C., Chomat, A., & Meheut, M. (1990). Á la recherche d'une stratégie pédagogique pour modéliser la matière dans ses différents états [In search of a pedagogical strategy to modelize matter in different states]. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 93, 51-62.
22. Lederman, N.G. (1999). Teachers' understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916-929.
23. Lederman, N.G., & Zeidler, D.L. (1987). Science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: do they really influence teacher behavior? Science Education, 71, 721-734.
24. Lemke, J.L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
25. Luft, J.A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: the impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 517-534.
26. Ministère de l'Éducation Nationale (1997). Accompagnement des programmes de 5e et de 4e. Collection collège [Guidelines for Year 7 and Year 8 Programmes. The Junior High School Collection]. Paris: C.N.D.P.
27. Ministère de l'Éducation Nationale (2001). Mise en oeuvre des travaux personnels encadrés. Lycées- rentrée 2001 [The Implementation of Guided Personal Work. High Schools. School Year 2001-2002). Paris: Direction de l'Enseignement Scolaire.
28. Ministère de l'Éducation Nationale (2002). Préparation de la rentrée 2002 dans les collèges et mise en oeuvre des itinéraires de découverte [Preparing for the school year 2002-2003 in junior high schools and the implementation of Paths to Discovery]. Bulletin Officiel du Ministère de l'Éducation Nationale et du Ministère de la Recherche, 16, 36-67.
29. Morge, L. (1998). Prendre en compte les difficultés des enseignants à interagir avec les élèves: impact sur les choix d'une formation en Sciences Physiques [Taking into account teachers' difficulties in interacting with pupils: the impact on choices of training in physics]. In A. Giordan J.-L. Martinand, & D. Raichwag (Eds.) Les Sciences, les techniques et leurs publics. Actes des XXes journées internationales sur la communication, l'éducation et la culture scientifiques et industrielles (pp. 361-366). Paris: U.F. de Didactique/Université Paris 7.
30. Morge, L. (2001). Caractérisation des phases de conclusion dans l'enseignement scientifique [Characterization of conclusion phases in science teaching]. Didaskalia, 18, 99-120.
31. Morge, L. (2003). De l'objectivation à la simulation des interactions maître-élèves [From objectivation to simulation in teacher-pupil interactions). ASTER, 37, 139-163.
32. Newton, D.P., & Newton, L.D. (2000). Do teachers support causal understanding through their discourse when teaching primary science. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 599-613.
33. Perret-Clermont, A.N. (1986). La construction sociale de l'intelligence [The Social Construction of Meaning]. Berne: Peter Lang.
34. Polman, J.L., & Pea R.D. (2001). Transformative communication as a cultural tool for guiding inquiry science. Science & Education, 85, 223-238.
35. Popper, K.R. (1934). La logique de la découverte scientifique [The Logic of Scientific Discovery]. Paris: Payot.
36. Postic, M. (1977). Observation et formation des enseignants [Observing and Training Teachers]. Paris: P.U.F..
37. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.) The handbook of research in teacher education (2nd edn; pp. 102-119). New York: Macmillan.
38. Rodriguez, S., & Thompson, I. (2001). Cohesion in science lesson discourse: clarity, relevance and sufficient information. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 929-940.
39. Scantlebury, K., Boone, W., Butler Kahle, J., & Fraser, B.J. (2001). Design, validation, and use of an evaluation instrument for monitoring systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 646-662.
40. Schön, D.A. (1983/trad. 1994). Le praticien réflexif. À la recherche du savoir caché dans l'agir professionnel [The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action]. Montréal: Éditions Logiques.
41. She, H.C., & Fischer, D. (2002). Teacher communication behavior and its association with students' cognitive and attitudinal outcomes in science in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 63-78.
42. Vérin, A. (1998). Enseigner de façon constructiviste, est-ce faisable? [Is teaching in a constructivist manner feasible?]. ASTER, 26, 133-163.
43. Vygotski, L.S. (1934/trad. 1985). Pensée et langage [Thought and Language]. Paris: Messidor/Editions sociales.
44. Yip, D.Y. (2001). Promoting the development of a conceptual change model of science instruction in prospective secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 755-770.
45. Zeidler, D.L., & Lederman, N.G. (1989). The effect of teachers' language on students' conception of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 771-783.