Student perspectives of assessment by TEMM model in physiology

American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 94-97

  Abraham, Reem Rachel ^a   Upadhya, Subramanya ^a   Torke, Sharmila ^a   Ramnarayan, K ^a  

^a MELAKA MANIPAL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

Author keywords

Motivation; Problem solving skills; Understanding

Indexed keywords

EID: 22344444234     PISSN: 10434046     EISSN: 15221229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/advan.00051.2004     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ben-David FM. Association of Medical Education in Europe guide no. 14: outcome-based education: part 3-assessment in outcome-based education. Med Teach 21: 23-25, 1999.
2. Ben-David FM. The role of assessment in expanding professional horizons. Med Teach 22: 472-477, 2000.
3. Davis MH and Harden RM. Association of Medical Education in Europe medical education guide no. 15: problem-based learning: a practical guide. Med Teach 21: 130-140, 1999.
4. Dugdale AE. The pathway MCQ: a method for teaching and testing deeper knowledge. Med Teach 20: 1998.
5. Feletti GI and Smith EKM. Modified essay questions: are they worth the effort? Med Educ 20: 126-132, 1986.
6. Fowell LS and Bligh G. Recent developments in assessing medical students. Postgrad Med J 74: 18-24, 1997.
7. Howley LD. Performance assessment in medical education: where we've been, and where we're going. Eval Health Prof 27: 285-303, 2004.
8. Hudson JN and Tonkin AL. Evaluating the impact of moving from discipline-based to integrated assessment. Med Educ 38: 832-843, 2004.
9. Knox JDE. The modified essay question, booklet no. 5. Edinburgh, Scotland: Association for the Study of Medical Education.
10. Lowry S. Assessment of students. BMJ 306: 51-54, 1993.
11. McLachlan CJ and Whiten CS. Marks, scores and grades: scaling and aggregating student assessment outcomes. Med Educ 34: 788-797, 2003.
12. Mcleod PJ, Cuello C, Capek R, and Collier B. A multidimensional evaluation system in a basic science course in medicine. Med Teach 19-22, 1996.
13. Newble DI and Entwistle NJ. Learning styles and approaches: implications for medical education. Med Educ 20: 162-175, 1986.
14. Ram P, van der Vleuten C, Rethans FF, Schouten B, Hobma S, and Grol R. Assessment in general practice: the predictive value of written knowledge tests and a multiple station examination for actual medical performance in daily practice. Med Educ 33: 197-203, 1999.
15. Schotanus JC. Student assessment and examination rules. Med Teach 21: 318-321, 1999.
16. Seale KJ, Chapman J, and Davey C. The influence of assessments on students' motivation to learn in a therapy degree course. Med Educ 34: 614-621, 2000.