Patterns of speciation in endemic Mexican Goodeid fish: Sexual conflict or early radiation?

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 922-929

  Ritchie, M G ^a   Webb, S A ^b   Graves, J A ^a   Magurran, A E ^a   Macias Garcia, C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH GEORGIA   (United States)

^c INSTITUTO DE ECOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Adaptive radiation; Goodeidae; Sexual dimorphism; Sexual selection; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FISH; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; MALE; MEXICO; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MORPHOMETRICS; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BODY WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; FISHES; GENETICS, POPULATION; GEOGRAPHY; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MEXICO; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

GOODEIDAE; PISCES;

EID: 22144433050     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00919.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Alvarez, J. & Arriola-Longoria, J. 1972. Primer goodeido fosil procedente del Pliocene jalisciense (Pisces, Teleostomi). Boletin de la Sociedad de Ciencias Naturales de Jalisco 6: 6-15.
2. Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2002. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415: 787-789.
3. Arnqvist, G., Edvarrdsson, M., Friberg, U. & Nilsson, T. 2000. Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 10460-10464.
4. Baker, R.H. & Wilkinson, G.S. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of sexual dimorphism and eye-span allometry in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Evolution 55: 1373-1385.
5. Barraclough, T.G. & Nee, S. 2001. Phylogenetics and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 391-399.
6. Barraclough, T.G., Harvey, P.H. & Nee, S. 1995. Sexual selection and taxonomic diversity in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond B 259: 211-215.
7. Barraclough, T.G., Vogler, A.P. & Harvey, P.H. 1998. Revealing the factors that promote speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353: 241-249.
8. Bisazza, A. 1997. Sexual selection constrained by internal fertilization in the livebearing fish Xenotoca eiseni. Anim. Behav. 54: 1347-1355.
9. Bisazza, A. & Marin, G. 1995. Sexual selection and sexual size dimorphism in the eastern mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 7: 169-183.
10. Butlin, R.K. & Ritchie, M.G. 1994. Mating behaviour and speciation. In: Behaviour and Evolution (P. J. B. Slater & T. R. Halliday, ed.), pp. 43-79. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J. & Rowe, L. 2003. Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 41-47.
12. Couldridge, V.C.K. & Alexander, G.J. 2002. Color pattern and species recognition in four closely related species of Lake Malawi cichlid. Behav. Ecol. 13: 59-64.
13. Cox, R.M., Skelly, S.L. & John-Alder, H.B. 2003. A comparative test of adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards. Evolution 57: 1653-1669.
14. Diehl, S.R. & Bush, G.L. 1989. The role of habitat preference in adaptation and speciation. In: Speciation and its Consequences (D. Otte & J. A. Endler, ed.), pp. 345-365. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
15. Doherty, P.F., Sorci, G., Royle, J.A., Hines, J.E., Nichols, J.D. & Boulinier, T. 2003. Sexual selection affects local extinction and turnover in bird communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 5858-5862.
16. Ehrlich, P.R. & Raven, P. 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586-608.
17. Eizirik, E., Kim, J.-H., Menotti-Raymond, M., Crawshavv, P.G., O'Brien, S.J. & Johnson, W.E. 2001 Phylogeography, population history and conservation genetics of jaguars (Panthera onca, Mammalia, Felidae). Mol. Ecol. 10: 65-79.
18. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125: 1-15.
19. Ferrari, L., Lopez-Martinez, M., Aguirre-Diaz, G. & Carrasco-Nunez, G. 1999. Space-time patterns of Cenozoic arc volcanism in central Mexico: from the Sierra Madre Occidental to the Mexican volcanic belt. Geology 27: 303-306.
20. Fitzsimons, J.M. 1972. A revision of two genera of goodeid fishes (Cyprinodontiformes, Osteichthyes) from the Mexican Plateau. Copeia 1972: 728-756.
21. Gage, M.J.G., Parker, G.A., Nylin, S. & Wiklund, C. 2002. Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 2309-2316.
22. Gavrilets, S. 2000. Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual selection. Nature 403: 886-889.
23. Gavrilets, S., Arnqvist, G. & Friberg, U. 2001. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 531-539.
24. Gray, D.A. & Cade, W.H. 2000. Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 14449-14454.
25. Harvey, P.H., May, R.M. & Nee, S. 1994. Phylogenies without fossils. Evolution 48: 523-529.
26. Hubbs, C.L. & Turner, C.L. 1939. Studies of the fishes of the order Cyprinodontes. XVI. A revision of the Goodeidae. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan 42: 1-80.
27. Holland, B. & Rice, W.R. 1998. Chase-away sexual selection: Antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52: 1-7.
28. Johns, G.C. & Avise, J.C. 1998. Tests for ancient species flocks based on molecular phylogenetic appraisals of Sebastes rockfishes and other marine fishes. Evolution 52: 1135-1146.
29. Knight, M.E. & Turner, G.F. 1999. Reproductive isolation among closely related Lake Malawi cichlids: can males recognize conspecific females by visual cues? Anim. Behav. 58: 761-768.
30. Losos, J.B. & Glor, R.E. 2003. Phylogenetic comparative methods and the geography of speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 220-227.
31. Lovette, I.J. & Bermingham, E. 1999. Explosive speciation in the New World Dendroica warblers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 1629-1636.
32. Macías Garcia, C. 1994. Social behavior and operational sex-ratios in the viviparous fish Girardinichthys multiradiatus. Copeia 1994: 919-925.
33. Macías Garcia, C., Jimenez, G. & Contreras, B. 1994. Correlational evidence of a sexually-selected handicap. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35: 253-259.
34. Macías Garcia, C., Saborío, E. & Berea, C. 1998. Does male-biased predation lead to male scarcity in viviparous fish? J. Fish Biol. 53: 104-117.
35. Martin, O.Y. & Hosken, D.J. 2003. The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature 423: 979-982.
36. Magurran, A.E. 1998. Population differentiation without speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 353: 275-286.
37. Malnate, E.U. 1960. Systematic division and evolution of the colubrid snake genus Natrix with comments on the subfamily Natricinae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117: 19-43.
38. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
39. McLain, D., Boulton, M.P. & Redfearn, T.P. 1995. Sexual selection and the risk of extinction of introduced birds on oceanic islands. Oikos 74: 27-34.
40. Møller, A.P. 2000. Sexual selection and conservation. In: Behaviour and Conservation (L. M. Gosling & W. J. Sutherland, eds), p. 161.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
41. Morrow, E.H. & Pitcher, T.E. 2003. Sexual selection and the risk of extinction in birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270: 1793-1799.
42. Morrow, E.H., Pitcher, T.E. & Arnqvist, G. 2003. No evidence that sexual selection is an 'engine of speciation' in birds. Ecol. Lett. 6: 228-234.
43. Moyaho, A., Macías Garcia, C. & Manjarrez, J. 2004. Predation risk is associated with the geographic variation of a sexually selected trait in a viviparous fish, Xenotoca variata. J. Zool. 262: 265-270.
44. Nee, S. 2001. Inferring speciation rates from phylogenies. Evolution 55: 661-668.
45. Nee, S., Mooers, A.Ø. & Harvey, P.H. 1992. Tempo and mode of evolution revealed from molecular phylogenies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 8322-8326.
46. Nee, S., May, R.M. & Harvey, P.H. 1994a. The reconstructed evolutionary process. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 344: 305-311.
47. Nee, S., Holmes, E.C., May, R.M. & Harvey, P.H. 1994b. Extinction rates can be estimated from molecular phylogenies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 344: 77-82.
48. Panhuis, T.M., Butlin, R., Zuk, M. & Tregenza, T. 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 364-371.
49. Parker, G.A. & Partridge, L. 1998. Sexual conflict and speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 353: 261-274.
50. Parker, P.G. & Waite, T.A. 1997. Mating systems, effective population size, and conservation of natural populations. In: Behavioral Approaches to Conservation in the Wild (J. R. Clemmons & R. Buchholz, eds), p. 243.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
51. Partridge, L. & Parker, G.A. 1999. Sexual conflict and speciation. In: Evolution of Biological Diversity (A. E. Magurran & R. M. May, eds), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
52. Price, T. 1998. Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353: 251-260.
53. Pybus, O.G. & Harvey, P.H. 2000. Testing macro-evolutionary models using incomplete molecular phylogenies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 2267-2272.
54. Rüber, L., van Tassell, J.L., Zardoya, R. 2003. Rapid speciation and ecological divergence in the american seven-spined gobies (Gobiidae, Gobiosomatini) inferred from a molecular phylogeny. Evolution 57: 1584-1598.
55. Schluter, D. 2000. The Ecology Of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
56. Schluter, D., Price, T., Mooers, A.Ø. & Ludwig, D. 1997. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive evolution. Evolution 51: 1699-1711.
57. Simmons, L.W., Tomkins, J.L., Kotiaho, J.S. & Hunt, J. 1999. Fluctuating paradigm. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 593-595.
58. Smith, M.L. 1980. The evolutionary and ecological history of the fish fauna of the Rio Lerma basin, Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
59. Swofford, D. 1998. PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (version 4). Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
60. Turner, G.F. 1999. Explosive speciation of African cichlid fishes. In: Evolution of Biological Diversity (A. E. Magurran & R. M. May, eds), pp. 113-129. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
61. Webb, S.A., Graves, J.A., Macias-Garcia, C., Magurran, A.E., Ó Foighil, D. & Ritchie, M.G. 2004. Molecular phylogeny of the livebearing Goodeidae (Cyprinodontiformes). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 30: 527-544.
62. Webster, A.J. & Purvis, A. 2002. Testing the accuracy of methods for reconstructing ancestral states of continuous characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 143-149.