Justifications for the Probation Sanction Among Residents of Virginia - Cool or Un-cool?

Federal Probation

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 42-48

  Payne, Brian K ^a   Gainey, Randy R ^a   Triplett, Ruth ^a   Danner, Mona J E ^a  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2142653478     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Andring, R. (1993). A plan for all seasons. Corrections Today, 55, 26-28.
2. Bagaric, M. (2000). Proportionality in sentencing. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 12, 143-165.
3. Beccaria, C. (1963 [1764]). On Crimes and Punishments. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Co.
4. Bravin, J. (2001). Jailed executives teach ethics to MBA students. Wall Street Journal. Accessed online September 20, 2001.
5. Brown, J. (1998). The wrong kind of pinstripes. Business Week. November 2:8.
6. Brown, M.P., & P. Elrod. (1995). Electronic house arrest: An examination of citizen attitudes. Crime and Delinquency, 41(3), 332-346.
7. Crouch, B. 1993. Is incarceration really worse? Justice Quarterly, 10, 67-88.
8. De Luca, H.R., T.J. Miller, & C. Wiedmann. (1991). Punishment versus rehabilitation: A proposal for revising sentencing practices. Federal Probation, 55, 37-45.
9. Durham, A. III. (1993). Public opinion regarding sentences for crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 21(1), 1-11.
10. Finckenauer, J. (1988). Public support for the death penalty. Justice Quarterly, 1, 81-100.
11. Gainey, R.R., & B.K. Payne. (2003). Changing attitudes towards house arrest with electronic monitoring: The impact of a single presentation? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 196-209.
12. Gainey, R.R., B.K. Payne, & M. O'Toole. (2000). The relationship between time in jail, time on electronic monitoring, and recidivism: An event history analysis of a jail-based program. Justice Quarterly, 17, 733-754.
13. Gordon, J. (1999). Do staff attitudes vary by position? American Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 81-93.
14. Hawk, K.M. (1994). Corrections must take action using courage, creativity and leadership. Corrections Today, 56, 72-73.
15. Kniest, T. (1998). Old habits die hard; corrections professionals constantly struggle against negative stereotypes. Corrections Today, 60, 46-48.
16. Johnson, W.W., R.G. Dunaway, & V.S. Burton. (1994). Goals of community based corrections. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 18, 79-93.
17. Lane, J. (1997). Can you make a horse drink? The effects of a corrections course on attitudes toward criminal punishment. Crime and Delinquency, 43, 186-202.
18. Lynch, M. (2000). Rehabilitation and rhetoric. Punishment and Society, 2, 40-65.
19. Moneymaker, J.M. (1986). The infliction of punishment. Deviant Behavior, 7, 371-384.
20. Palmer, T. (2002). Individualized intervention with young multiple offenders. New York: Routledge.
21. Payne, B.K., & R.R. Gainey. (1998). A qualitative assessment of the pains experienced on electronic monitoring. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42, 149-163.
22. Payne, B.K., & V. Coogle. (1998). Factors impacting the development of attitudes about the death penalty. Corrections Compendium, 23(4), 1-5
23. Payne, B.K., & R.R. Gainey. (2000). Electronic Monitoring: Philosophical, Systemic, and Political Issues," Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. 31(3/4), pp. 93-111, 2000.
24. Petersilia, J., & E. Deschenes. (1994). Perceptions of punishment: inmates and staff rank the severity of prison versus intermediate sanctions. Prison Journal, 74, 306-328.
25. Rose, D.R. & T.R. Clear. (1998). Incarceration, social capital, and crime: Implications for social disorganization theory. Criminology, 36, 441-479.
26. Sandys, M., & E.F. McGarrell. (1995). Attitudes towards capital punishment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 191-213.
27. Shichor, D. (1992). Following the penological pendulum. Federal probation, 56(2), 19-25.
28. Sigler, R., & D. Lamb. (1995). Community-based alternatives to prison: How the public and court personnel view them. Federal Probation, 59(2), 3-9.
29. Spelman, W. (1995). The severity of intermediate sanctions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 107-135.
30. Tunick, M. (1992). Hegel's political philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31. Von Hirsch, A. (1986). Doing justice: The choice of punishments. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
32. Warr, M., & M. Stafford. (1984). Public goals of punishment and support for the death penalty. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21, 95-111.
33. White, T.W. (1989). Corrections: Out of balance. Federal Probation, 53(4), 31-35.
34. Whitehead J.T. & M.B. Blankenship. (2000). The gender gap in capital punishment attitudes. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 25, 1-13.
35. Wood, P. and H. Grasmick. (1999). Toward the development of punishment equivalencies. Justice Quarterly, 16, 19-50.
36. Zimmerman, S.E., D.J. Van Alstyne, & C.S. Dunn. (1988). The National Punishment Survey and public policy consequences. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 25(2), 120-149.
37. Zimring, F., & G. Hawkins. (1995). Incapacitation: Penal confinement and the restraint of crime. New York: Oxford University Press.