A qualitative assessment of the pains experienced on electronic monitoring

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 149-163

  Payne, Brian K ^a   Gainey, Randy R ^a  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIME; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; MALE; MONITORING; OFFENDER; PUNISHMENT; SELF EVALUATION; SOCIAL PROBLEM;

EID: 0031862009     PISSN: 0306624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X9804200207     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Apospori, E., & Alpert, G. (1993). Research note: The role of differential experience with the criminal justice system in changes in perceptions of severity of legal sanctions over time. Crime and Delinquency, 39(2), 184-194.
2. Austin, J. (1995). An overview (correctional options). Corrections Today, 57(1), 1-9.
3. Berg, B. (1995). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4. Brown, M. P., & Elrod, P. (1995). Electronic house arrest: An examination of citizen attitudes. Crime and Delinquency, 41(3), 332-346.
5. Charles, M. T. (1989). The development of a juvenile electronic monitoring program. Federal Probation, 53(2), 3-11.
6. Clark, C. S. (1994). Prison overcrowding: Will building more prisons cut the crime rate? CQ Researcher, 4(5), 99-106.
7. Colson, C., & Van Ness, D. W. (1989). Alternatives to incarceration: A conservative perspective. Journal of State Government, 62(2), 59-64.
8. Crouch, B. M. (1993). Is incarceration really worse: Analysis of offenders' preferences for prison over probation. Justice Quarterly, 10(1), 67-88.
9. Denying ex-cons the vote permanently: What purpose is served? (1996, September 26). The Virginian-Pilot, p. A14.
10. Dillingham, S. D., Montgomery, R. H. Jr., & Tabor, R. W. (1990). Probation and parole in practice (2nd ed.). Cincinnati: Anderson.
11. Jolin, A., & Stipak, B. (1992). Drug treatment and electronically monitored home confinement: An evaluation of a community-based sentencing option. Crime and Delinquency, 38(2), 158-170.
12. Larivee, J. J. (1993). Community programs: A risky business. Corrections Today, 55(6), 20-24.
13. Lilly, J. R. (1989). What about house arrest. Journal of State Government, 62, 89-91.
14. Lilly, J. R., Ball, R. A., Curry, O. D., & Smith, R. C. (1992). The Pride, Inc., Program: An evaluation of 5 years of electronic monitoring. Federal Probation, 56(4), 42-33.
15. Lilly, R., & Jenkins, J. (1989, October 6). Life with the tag. New Statesman and Society, 2(70), 23-24.
16. Maineprize, S. (1992, April). Electronic monitoring in corrections: Assessing cost effectiveness and the potential for widening the net of social control. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32, 161-180.
17. Maxfield, M. J., & Baumer, T. L. (1990). Home detention with electronic monitoring: Comparing pretrial and postconviction programs. Crime and Delinquency, 36(4), 521-536.
18. McClelland, K. A., & Alpert, G. P. (1985). Factor analysis applied to magnitude estimates of punishment seriousness: Patterns of individual differences. Journal of Quantititative Criminology, 1(3), 307-318.
19. Papy, J. E., & Nimer, R. (1991). Electronic monitoring in Florida. Federal Probation, 55(1), 31-33.
20. Petersilia, J., & Deschenes, E. P. (1994a). Perceptions of punishment: Inmates and staff rank severity of prison versus intermediate sanctions. Prison Journal, 74(3), 306-329.
21. Petersilia, J., & Deschenes, E. P. (1994b). What punishes? Inmates rank the severity of prison vs. intermediate sanctions. Federal Probation, 58(1), 3-8.
22. Rackmill, S. J. (1994). An analysis of home confinement as a sanction. Federal Probation, 58(1), 45-52.
23. Renzema, M., & Skeleton, D. (1991). The scope of electronic monitoring today. Journal of Offender Monitoring, 4(4), 6-11.
24. Rokach, A. (1997). Loneliness in jail: Coping strategies. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 41(3), 260-271.
25. Schmidt, A. K. (1991). Electronic monitors: Realistically, what can be expected? Federal Probation, 55(2), 47-53.
26. Sigler, R. T., & Lamb, D. (1996). Community-based alternatives to prison: How the public and court personnel view them. Journal of Offender Monitoring, 9(2), 1-8.
27. (Reprinted from Federal Probation, 59(2), 3-9, 1995)
28. Spelman, W. (1995). The severity of intermediate sanctions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32(2), 107-135.
29. Sullivan, R.E. Jr. (1990, November 29). Reach out and guard someone: Using phones and bracelets to reduce prison overcrowding. Rolling Stone, 592, 51.
30. Sykes, G. (1958). The society of captives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31. Turner, M. G., Cullen, F. T., Sundt, J. L., & Applegate, B. (1997). Public tolerance for community based sanctions. Prison Journal, 77(1), 6-26.
32. Walker, J. L. (1990). Sharing the credit, sharing the blame: Managing political risks in electronically monitored house arrest. Federal Probation, 54(2), 16-20.