Changing Attitudes Toward House Arrest with Electronic Monitoring: The Impact of a Single Presentation?

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 196-209

  Gainey, Randy R ^a   Payne, Brian K ^a  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitudinal change; Electronic monitoring; House arrest

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COMMUNITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; DETENTION; EDUCATION; ELECTRONIC MONITORING; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SURVEY; HOUSE ARREST; HUMAN; INFORMATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MONITORING; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; POLICY; STUDENT; SUPPORT GROUP; ADOLESCENT; ELECTRONICS; PRISON;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE; ELECTRONICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PRISONS;

EID: 0037980273     PISSN: 0306624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X03251294     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Blankenship, M. B., & Giacopassi, D. J. (1990). Limitations of assessing attitudinal change among students of criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 1, 255-260.
2. Braithwaite, J. (1995). Reintegrative shaming, republicanism, and policy. In H. D. Barlow (Ed.), Crime and public policy: Putting theory to work (pp. 191-205). Boulder, CO: Westview.
3. Brown, M. P., & Elrod, P. (1995). Electronic house arrest: An examination of citizen attitudes. Crime and Delinquency, 41, 332-346.
4. Chisman, F. P. (1976). Attitude psychology and the study of public opinion. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
5. Cohen, A. R. (1964). Attitude change and social influence. New York: Basic Books.
6. Cohn, A. W. (1998). Do EM-serving agencies always act responsibly? Journal of Offender Monitoring, 11, 25-28.
7. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
8. Corbett, R. P., Jr., & Marx, G. T. (1991). No soul in the machine: Technofallacies in the electronic monitoring movement. Justice Quarterly, 8, 399-414.
9. Courtright, K., Berg, B. L., & Mutchnick, R. J. (1997). Effects of house arrest with electronic monitoring on DUI offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 24, 35-51.
10. Cullen, F. T., Clark, G. A., Cullen, J. B., & Mathers, R. A. (1985). Attribution, salience, and attitudes toward criminal sanctioning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 305-331.
11. Doob, A. N., & Roberts, J. A. (1988). Public punitiveness and public knowledge of the facts: Some Canadian surveys. In N. Walker & M. Hough (Eds.), Public attitudes toward sentencing: Surveys from five countries (pp. 111-133). Aldershot, UK: Gower.
12. Durham, A. M. (1993). Public opinion regarding sentences for crime: Does it exist? Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 1-11.
13. Elrod, P., & Brown, M. P. (1996). Predicting public support for electronic house arrest: Results from a New York county survey. American Behavioral Scientist, 39, 461-473.
14. Emmons, D., & Nutt, L. (1995). Values education and the criminal justice curriculum. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 6, 147-152.
15. Foglia, W. D. (1997). Perceptual deterrence and the mediating effect of internalized norms among inner-city teenagers. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 414-442.
16. Gainey R. R., & Payne, B. K. (2000). Understanding the experience of house arrest with electronic monitoring: An analysis of quantitative and qualitative data. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 84-96.
17. Gainey, R. R., Payne, B. K., & O'Toole, M. (2000). The relationship between time in jail, time on electronic monitoring, and recidivism: An event history analysis of a jail-based program. Justice Quarterly, 17, 733-752.
18. Gerber, J., & Engelhardt-Greer, S. (1996). Just and painful: Attitudes toward sentencing criminals. In T. J. Flanagan & D. R. Longmire (Eds.), Americans view crime and justice: A national public opinion survey (pp. 62-74). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Giacopassi, D. J., & Blankenship, M. B. (1991). The effects of criminal justice pedagogy on student attitudes. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 97-103.
20. Houk, J. M. (1984). Electronic monitoring of probationers. Golden Gate University Law Review, 14, 431-446.
21. Jayewardene, C. H. S., Lang, S., & Gainer, C. (1977). Changing attitudes to the criminal justice system through formal education. Crime and Justice, 5, 126-130.
22. Jolin, A., & Stipak, B. (1992). Drug treatment and electronically monitored home confinement: An evaluation of a community-based sentencing option. Crime and Delinquency, 38, 158-170.
23. Knox, W. E., Lindsay, P., & Kolb, M. (1993). Higher education, college characteristics and student experiences: Long-term effects of educational satisfactions and perceptions. Journal of Higher Education, 63, 303-328.
24. Kuplinski, J. R. (1990). Electronic offender monitoring in Virginia: Evaluation report. Richmond, VA: Department of Criminal Justice Services.
25. Lane, J. S. (1997). Can you make a horse drink? The effects of a corrections course on attitudes toward criminal punishment. Crime and Delinquency, 43, 186-202.
26. Larivee, J. J. (1993). Community programs: A risky business. Corrections Today, 55, 20-24.
27. Leonard, W. H., & Lowery, L. F. (1979). Was there really an experiment? Educational Researcher, 8, 4-7.
28. Lilly, J. R. (1989). What about house arrest? Journal of State Government, 62, 89-91.
29. Lilly, J. R., & Ball, R. A. (1987). A brief history of house arrest and electronic monitoring. Northern Kentucky Law Review, 13, 343-374.
30. Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effect of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
31. Maineprize, S. (1992). Electronic monitoring in corrections and the potential for widening the net of social control. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 34, 161-180.
32. Maxfield, M. G., & Baumer, T. L. (1990). Home detention with electronic monitoring: Comparing pretrial and postconviction programs. Crime and Delinquency, 36, 521-536.
33. Oskamp, S. (1977). Attitudes and opinions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34. Payne, B., & King, T. (1995). The principles of science and the criminal justice student. LAE Journal of the American Criminal Justice Association, 56, 15-20.
35. Payne, B. K., & Gainey, R. R. (1998). A qualitative assessment of the pains experienced on electronic monitoring. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42, 149-163.
36. Payne, B. K., & Gainey, R. R. (1999a). Attitudes towards electronic monitoring: Perceptions of students versus perceptions of offenders experiencing the sanction. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 29, 195-208.
37. Payne, B. K., & Gainey, R. R. (1999b). How monitoring punishes. Journal of Offender Monitoring, 12, 23-25.
38. Paternoster, R., & Simpson, S. S. (1996). Sanction threats and appeals to morality: Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law and Society Review, 30, 549-583.
39. Peck, K. (1988). High-tech house arrest. Progressive, 52, 26-28.
40. Petersilia, J. (1997). Probation in the United States. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime andjustice: A review of research (pp. 149-200). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Piquero, A., & Paternoster, R. (1998). An application of Stafford and Warr's reconceptualization of deterrence to drinking and driving. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 3-39.
42. Renzema, M., & Skeleton, D. (1991). The scope of electronic monitoring today. Journal of Offender Monitoring, 4, 6-11.
43. Roberts, J. V. (1992). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 99-180). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Roberts, J. V. (1996). Rape reform in Canada: Public knowledge and opinions. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 133-148.
45. Roberts, J. V. (1997). Public opinion, crime and criminal justice. Boulder, CO: Westview.
46. Rose, D. R., & Clear, T. R. (1998). Incarceration, social capital, and crime: Implications for social disorganization theory. Criminology, 36, 441-480.
47. Selke, W. L. (1980). The impact of higher education on crime orientations. Journal of Criminal Justice, 8, 175-184.
48. Sykes, G. M. (1958). The society of captives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49. Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: Knopf.
50. Triandis, H. C. (1971). Attitude and attitude change. New York: John Wiley.
51. Vandiver, M., & Giacopassi, D. (1997). One million and counting: Students' estimates of the annual number of homicides in the U.S. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 8, 135-143.
52. Wilkins, D. (1996). Are we using the wrong teaching method in our criminal justice classes? Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 7, 23-34.