Toward the development of punishment equivalencies: Male and female inmates rate the severity of alternative sanctions compared to prison

Justice Quarterly

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 19-50

  Wood, Peter B ^a   Grasmick, Harold G ^b  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26444527041     PISSN: 07418825     EISSN: 17459109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07418829900094041     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Apospori, E. and G. Alpert. 1993. “Research Note: The Role of Differential Experience with the Criminal Justice System in Changes in Perception of Severity of Legal Sanctions over Time.” Crime and Delinquency 39:184-94
2. Benekos, P.J. 1992. “Public Policy and Sentencing Reform: The Politics of Correction.” Federal Probation (March):4-10.
3. Brody, Lisa and Robert Agnew, 1997. “Gender and Crime: A General Strain Theory Perspective.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinqmncy 34:275-306.
4. Byrne, J.M., A.J. Lurigio, and J. Petersilia, eds. 1992. Smart Sentencing; The Emergence of Intermediate Sanctions. Newbury Park, California. Sage.
5. Crouch, B.M. 1993. “Is Incarceration Really Worse? Analysis of Offenders’ Preferences for Prison over Probation.” Justice Quarterly 10:67-88.
6. Cullen, Francis T., John B. Cullen, and John F. Wozniak. 1988. “Is Rehabilitation Dead? The Myth of the Punitive Public.” Journal of Criminal Justice 16:303-17.
7. Datalinks, Inc. 1995. Oklahoma Judges and District Attorneys on Crime, Punishment, and Prisons. Oklahoma City: No publisher.
8. Dolescahl, Eugene. 1982. “The Dangers of Criminal Justice Reform.” Criminal Justice Abstracts (March): 133-152.
9. Duffee, David. 1986. Correctional Management: Change and Control in Correctional Organizations. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
10. Durham, Alexis M III. 1994. Crisis and Reform: Current Issues in American Punishment. Boston: Little, Brown.
11. Fleisher, M.S. 1995. Beggars and Thieves: Lives of Urban Street Criminals. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
12. Grasmick, Harold G. and Robert Bursik, Jr. 1990. “Conscience, Significant Others, and Rational Choice: Extending the Deterrence Model.” Law and Society Review 24:837-61.
13. Innes, Christopher A. 1993. “Recent Public Opinion in the United States toward Punishment and Corrections.” Prison Journal 73:220-36.
14. Keeney, R.L. and H. Raiffa. 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives, New York: Wiley.
15. Klein, A.R. 1988. Alternative Sentencing: A Practitioner’s Guide. Cincinnati: Anderson.
16. Klein, Malcolm. 1979. “Deinstitutionalization and Diversion of Juvenile Offenders: A Litany of Impediments.” In Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, edited by Normal Morris and Michael Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Lemert, Edwin. 1971. Instead of Court: Diversion in Juvenile Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18. McClelland, K.A. and G. Alpert. 1985. “Factor Analysis Applied to Magnitude Estimates of Punishment Seriousness: Patterns of Individual Differences.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 1:307-18.
19. Morris, N. and M. Tonry. 1990. Between Prison and Probation: Intermediate Punishments in a Rational Sentencing System. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. National Institute of Justice (NIJ). 1993. “Intermediate Sanctions.” Research in Brief. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21. National Institute of Justice (NIJ). 1995. National Assessment Program: 1994 Survey Result’s. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
22. O’Leary, V. and W. Raleigh. 1994. “Risk and Punishment in Intermediate Sanctions.” Pp. 3-16 in Community Corrections Report. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute Inc.
23. Petersilia, J. 1990. “When Probation Becomes More Dreaded Than Prison.” Federal Probation 54:23-27.
24. Petersilia, J. and E.P. Deschenes. 1994a, “What Punishes? Inmates Rank the Severity of Prison vs. Intermediate Sanctions.” Federal Probation 58:3-8.
25. Petersilia, J. and E.P. Deschenes. 1994b. “Perceptions of Punishment: Inmates and Staff Rank the Severity of Prison versus Intermediate Sanctions.” Prison Journal 74:306-28.
26. Potter, Joan. 1981. “The Pitfalls of Pretrial Detention.” corrections 7(1):5-7, 10-11, 36.
27. Public Agenda Foundation. 1991. Punishing Criminals: The People of Delaware Consider the Options. Philadelphia: Fell.
28. Public Agenda Foundation. 1993. Punishing Criminals; Pennsylvanians Consider the Options. Philadelphia: Fell.
29. Reichel, Philip L. 1997. Corrections. St. Paul: West.
30. Sehur, Edwin. 1973. Radical Non-Intervention: Rethinking the Delinquency Problem. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31. Spelman, William. 1995. “The Severity of Intermediate Sanctions,” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 32:107-35.
32. Ulmer, Jeffrey T. 1997. Social Worlds of Sentencing: Court Communities under Sentencing Guidelines. Albany: SUNY Press.
33. U.S. Dept, of Justice. 1990. A Survey of Intermediate Sanctions. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
34. von Hirseh, Andrew and Andrew Ashworth, eds. 1992. Principled Sentencing. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
35. Wicharaya, Tamasak. 1995. Simple Theory, Hard Reality: The Impact of Sentencing Reforms on Courts, Prisons, and Crime. Albany: SUNY Press.
36. Williams, Kirk and Richard Hawkins. 1986. “Perceptual Research on General deterrence: A Critical Review.” Law and Society Review 20:545-72.
37. Williams, Kirk and Richard Hawkins. 1989. “The Meaning of Arrest for Wife Assault.” Criminology 27:163-81.
38. Wood, Peter B., Walter R. Gove, James A. Wilson, and John K. Cochran. 1997. “Non-Social Reinforcement and Habitual Criminal Conduct: An Extension of Learning Theory.” Criminology 35:335-66.