메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 47-56

Counterfactual reasoning: Resolving inconsistency before your eyes

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 21344459252     PISSN: 00332879     EISSN: 2054670X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5334/pb-45-1-47     Document Type: Conference Paper
Times cited : (5)

References (12)
  • 1
    • 2442537274 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Contradictions and counterfactuals: Generating belief revisions in conditional inference
    • W. D. Gray & C. D. Schunn (Eds.)
    • Byrne, R. M. J. & Walsh, C. R. (2002). Contradictions and counterfactuals: Generating belief revisions in conditional inference. In W. D. Gray & C. D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 160-165.
    • (2002) Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , pp. 160-165
    • Byrne, R.M.J.1    Walsh, C.R.2
  • 3
    • 21344440751 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Suppression and belief revision: Two sides of the same coin?
    • Dieussaert, K., De Neys, W., & Schaeken, W. (2005). Suppression and belief revision: two sides of the same coin? Psychologica Belgica, 45 (1), 29-46.
    • (2005) Psychologica Belgica , vol.45 , Issue.1 , pp. 29-46
    • Dieussaert, K.1    De Neys, W.2    Schaeken, W.3
  • 4
    • 0031258875 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Belief change as prepositional update
    • Elio, R. & Pelletier, F. J. (1997). Belief change as prepositional update. Cognitive Science, 21, 419-460.
    • (1997) Cognitive Science , vol.21 , pp. 419-460
    • Elio, R.1    Pelletier, F.J.2
  • 5
    • 21344431857 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • On using human nonmonotonic reasoning to inform artificial systems
    • Ford, M. (2005). On using human nonmonotonic reasoning to inform artificial systems. Psychologica Belgica, 45 (1), 57-70.
    • (2005) Psychologica Belgica , vol.45 , Issue.1 , pp. 57-70
    • Ford, M.1
  • 6
    • 21344465860 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The evaluation of diagnostic explanations for inconsistencies
    • Legrenzi, P. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2005). The evaluation of diagnostic explanations for inconsistencies. Psychologica Belgica, 45 (1), 19-28.
    • (2005) Psychologica Belgica , vol.45 , Issue.1 , pp. 19-28
    • Legrenzi, P.1    Johnson-Laird, P.N.2
  • 9
    • 0035718938 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reasoning counterfactually: Combining and rending
    • Revlin, R., Gate, C. L., & Rouss, T. S. (2001). Reasoning counterfactually: Combining and rending. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1196-1208.
    • (2001) Memory & Cognition , vol.29 , pp. 1196-1208
    • Revlin, R.1    Gate, C.L.2    Rouss, T.S.3
  • 10
    • 0008478905 scopus 로고
    • The primacy of generalities in hypothetical reasoning
    • Revlis, R. & Hayes, J. R. M. (1972). The primacy of generalities in hypothetical reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 268-290.
    • (1972) Cognitive Psychology , vol.3 , pp. 268-290
    • Revlis, R.1    Hayes, J.R.M.2
  • 12
    • 0002025350 scopus 로고
    • The effect of changed material on ability to do formal syllogistic reasoning
    • Wilkins, M. C. (1928). The effect of changed material on ability to do formal syllogistic reasoning. Archives of Psychology, 102, 83.
    • (1928) Archives of Psychology , vol.102 , pp. 83
    • Wilkins, M.C.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.