Students' opinions about their preparation for clinical practice

Medical Education

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 704-712

  Prince, Katinka J A H ^a   Boshuizen, Henny P A ^b   Van Der Vleuten, Cees P M ^a   Scherpbier, Albert J J A ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attitude of health personnel; Clinical competence *standards; Education, medical, undergraduate *standards; Focus groups; Students, medical; Workload

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL EDUCATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPETENCE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SKILL; SOCIALIZATION; THEORY; TRAINING; WORKLOAD;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TEACHING; WORKLOAD;

EID: 21244490370     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02207.x     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Radcliffe C, Lester H. Perceived stress during undergraduate medical training: a qualitative study. Med Educ 2003;37:32-8.
2. Alexander DA, Haldane JD. Medical education: a student perspective. Med Educ 1979;13:336-41.
3. Walker LG, Haldane JD, Alexander DA. A medical curriculum: evaluation by final year students. Med Educ 1981;15:377-82.
4. Firth J. Levels and sources of stress in medical students. BMJ 1986;92:1177-80.
5. Moss F, McManus IC. The anxieties of new clinical students. Med Educ 1992;26:17-20.
6. Norman GR, Schmidt HG. The psychological basis of problem-based learning: a review of the evidence. Acad Med 1992;67:557-65.
7. Remmen R, Denekens J, Scherpbier A, Hermann I, van der Vleuten C, Van Royen P, Bossaert L. An evaluation study of the didactic quality of clerkships. Med Educ 2000;34:460-4.
8. Lubitz RM, Nguyen DD. Medical student abuse during third-year clerkships. JAMA 1996;275:414-6.
9. Prince KJAH, Van de Wiel MWJ, Scherpbier AJJA, van der Vleuten CPM, Boshuizen HPA. A qualitative analysis of the transition from theory to practice in undergraduate training in a PBL medical school. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2000;5:105-16.
10. Boshuizen HPA. The shock of practice: effects on clinical reasoning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York 1996.
11. Busari JO, Scherpbier AJJA, Boshuizen HPA. Comparative study of medical education as perceived by students at three Dutch universities. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 1997;1:141-51.
12. Scherpbier AJJA, Wolfhagen HAP, Essed GGM. [Het oordeel van co-assistenten over de voorbereiding op de co-assistentschappen in Maastricht.] Bull Med Onderwijs 1994;13:178-83.
13. Newble DI, Clarke RM. The approaches to learning of students in a traditional and in an innovative problem-based medical school. Med Educ 1986; 20:267-73.
14. Van Dalen J. Skillslab, Centre for Training of Skills. Maastricht: Maastricht University Press 2000.
15. Jongbloets MWM, Dolmans DHJM, Hoogenboom RJJ, Wolfhagen HAP. [Het ritme van de tijdsbesteding van de PGO student.] Tijdschr Voor Med Ondenaijs 2000;19:49-56.
16. Dolmans DH, Schmidt HG. What drives the student in problem-based learning. Med Educ 1994;28:372-80.
17. Woodward CA, Ferrier BM. The content of the medical curriculum at McMaster University: graduates' evaluation of their preparation for postgraduate training. Med Educ 1983;17:54-60.
18. Regehr G, Norman GR. Issues in cognitive psychology: implications for professional education. Acad Med 1996;71:988-1001.
19. van der Vleuten CPM, Verwijnen GM, Wijnen WHFW. Fifteen years of experience with progress testing in a problem-based learning curriculum. Med Teacher 1996, 2003;18:103-9.
20. Verhoeven B. Progress Testing. The Utility of an Assessment Concept. Thesis: University of Maastricht. Groningen: Stichting drukkerij C Regenboog 2003.
21. Van Berkel HJM, Nuy HJP, Geerligs T. The influence of progress tests and block tests on study behaviour. Instr Sci 1995;22:317-33.
22. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors. London: GMC 1993.
23. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors: Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Education. London: GMC 2003. http://www.gmc-uk.org/med_ed/ tomdoc.htm.