Intraparental gamete competition provides a selective advantage for the development of hybrid sterility via meiotic drive

Evolution

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1229-1236

  Adams, Curtis S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Hybrid sterility; Meiotic drive; Parent offspring conflict; Population genetics; Selection; Sperm competition

Indexed keywords

HYBRID; POPULATION GENETICS; SELECTION; SPERM COMPETITION; STERILITY;

EID: 21044434378     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01773.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Atlan, A., H. Merçot, C. Landre, and C. Montchamp-Moreau. 1997. The sex-ratio trait in Drosophila simulans: geographical distribution of distortion and resistance. Evolution 51:1886-1895.
2. Arnqvist, R., M. Edvardsson, U. Friberg, and T. Nilsson. 2000. Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:10460-10464.
3. Barton, N. H., and B. Charlesworth. 1984. Genetic revolutions, founder effects, and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15:133-164.
4. Brutnell, T. P., B. R. May, and S. L. Dellaporta. 1997. The Ac-st2 element of maize exhibits a positive dosage effect and epigenetic regulation. Genetics 147:823-834.
5. Buckler, E. S., IV, T. L. Phelps-Durr, C. S. Keith-Buckler, R. K. Dawe, J. F. Doebley, and T. P. Holtsford. 1999. Meiotic drive of chromosomal knobs reshaped the maize genome. Genetics 153:415-426.
6. Carvalho, A. B., and S. Casaccia-Vaz. 1999. Are Drosophila SR drive chromosomes always balanced? Heredity 83:221-228.
7. Charlesworth, B., and D. L. Hartl. 1978. Population dynamics of the segregation distorter polymorphism of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 89:171-192.
8. Coyne, J. A. 1986. Meiotic segregation and male recombination in interspecific hybrids of Drosophila. Genetics 89:171-192.
9. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1993. Further evidence against meiotic-drive models of hybrid sterility. Evolution 47:685-687.
10. _. 1997. "Patterns of speciation in Drosophila" revisited. Evolution 51:295-302.
11. Darwin, C. 1859. The origin of species. Mentor Press, New York.
12. Davis, A. W., and C.-I. Wu. 1996. The broom of the sorcerer's apprentice: the fine structure of a chromosomal region causing reproductive isolation between two sibling species of Drosophila. Genetics 143:1287-1298.
13. Davis, A. W., E. G. Noonburg, and C.-I. Wu. 1994. Evidence for complex genic interactions between conspecific chromosomes underlying hybrid female sterility in the Drosophila simulans clade. Genetics 137:191-194.
14. Dermitzakis, E. T., J. P. Masly, H. M. Waldrip, and A. G. Clark. 2000. Non-Mendelian segregation of sex chromosomes in heterospecific Drosophila males. Genetics 154:687-694.
15. Dobzhansky, T. 1941. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
16. Drapeau, M., and J. H. Werren. 1999. Differences in mating behavior and sex ratio between three sibling species of Nasonia. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1:223-224.
17. Faris, J. D., B. Laddomada, and B. S. Gill. 1998. Molecular mapping of segregation distortion loci in Aegilops tauschii. Genetics 149:319-327.
18. Fitzpatrick, B. M. 2004. Rates of evolution of hybrid inviabilitiy in birds and mammals. Evolution 58:1865-1870.
19. Fosella, J., S. A. Samani, L. M. Silver, S. M. King, K. T. Vaughan, P. Olds-Clarke, and S. H. Pilder. 2000. An axonemal dynein at the hybrid sterility 6 locus: implications for t haplotype-specific male sterility and the evolution of species barriers. Mammal 11:8-15.
20. Frank, S. A. 1989. The evolutionary dynamics of cytoplasmic male sterility. Am. Nat. 133:345-376.
21. _. 1991. Divergence of meiotic drive-suppression systems as an explanation for sex-biased hybrid sterility and inviability. Evolution 45:262-267.
22. _. 1995. Mutual policing and repression of competition in the evolution of cooperative groups. Nature 377:520-522.
23. Gavrilets, G. 2003. Perspective: models of speciation: What have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 57:2197-2215.
24. Hart, M. W., and R. K. Groseberg. 1999. Kin interactions in a colonial hydrozoan (Hydractina symbiolongicarpus): population structure on a mobile landscape. Evolution 53:793-805.
25. Hartig, R., R. L. Shoeman, A. Janetzko, G. Tolstonog, and P. Traub. 1998. DNA-mediated transport of the intermediate filament protein vimentin into the nucleus of cultured cells. J. Cell Sci. 111:3573-3584.
26. Hartl, D. L. 1975. Stochastic selection of gametes and zygotes. Pp. 233-242 in D. L. Mulcahy, ed. Gamete competition in plants and animals. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
27. Harushima, Y., N. Karata, M. Yano, Y. Nagamura, T. Sasaki, Y. Minobe, and M. Nakagahra. 1996. Detection of segregation distortions in an indica-japonica rice cross using a high-resolution molecular map. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92:145-150.
28. Hedrick, P. W. 1981. The establishment of chromosomal variants. Evolution 35:322-332.
29. Henikoff, S., K. Ahmad, and H. Malk. 2001. The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA. Science 293:1098-1102.
30. Houtchens, K., and T. W. Lyttle. 2003. Responder (Rsp) alleles in the segregation distorter (SD) system of meiotic drive in Drosophila may represent a complex family of satellite repeat sequences. Genetica 117:291-302.
31. Hsu, F. C., C. J. Wang, C. M. Chen, H. Y. Hu, and C. C. Chen. 2003. Molecular characterization of a family of tandemly repeated DNA sequences, TR-1, in heterochromatic knobs of maize and its relatives. Genetics 164:1087-1097.
32. Hurst, L. D., and A. Pomiankowski. 1991. Causes of sex ratio bias may account for unisexual sterility in hybrids: a new explantation of Haldane's rule and related phenomena. Genetics 128:841-858.
33. Johnson, N. A., and C.-I. Wu. 1992. An empirical test of the meiotic drive models of hybrid sterility: sex-ratio data from hybrids between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila sechellia. Genetics 130:507-511.
34. Kulathinal, R., and R. S. Singh. 1998. Cytological characterization of premeiotic versus postmeiotic defects producing hybrid male sterility among sibling species of the Drosophila melanogaster complex. Evolution 52:1067-1079.
35. Levy, F. 1991. A genetic analysis of reproductive barriers in Phacella dubia. Heredity 67:331-346.
36. Lewontin, R. C. 1967. Population genetics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1:37-70.
37. _. 1970. Levels of selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1:1-45.
38. Liou, L. W., and T. D. Price. 1994. Speciation by reinforcement of premating isolation. Evolution 48:1451-1459.
39. Lyttle, T. W. 1991. Segregation distorters. Annu. Rev. Genet. 25:511-557.
40. Maeueler, W., G. Bassili, C. Epplen, H.-G. Keyl, and J. U. Epplen. 1999. Protein binding to simple repetitive sequences depends on DNA secondary structures(s). Chrom. Res. 7:163-166.
41. Manabe, M., T. Ino, M. Kasaya, S. Takyumi, N. Mori, I. Ohtsuka, and C. Nakamura. 1999. Segregation distortion through female gametophytes in interspecific hybrids of tetraploid wheat as revealed by RAPD analysis. Hereditas 131:47-53.
42. Maruyama, T. 1970. On the fixation probability of mutant genes in a subdivided population. Genet. Res. 15:221-225.
43. Mitra, S., H. Landel, and S. Pruett-Jones. 1996. Species richness covaries with mating system in birds. Auk 113:544-551.
44. Mueller, L. D. 1997. Theoretical and empirical examination of density-dependent selection. Ann. Rev. Ecol Syst. 28:269-288.
45. Muller, H. J. 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution, and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6:71-125.
46. Muller, H. J., and F. Settles. 1927. The non-functioning of genes in spermatozoa. Zeit. Ind. Abst. Vererb. 43:285-312.
47. Narain, Y., and K. Fredga. 1998. Spermatogenesis in common shrews, Sorex araneus, from a hybrid zone with extensive Robertsonian polymorphism. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 80:158-164.
48. Nei, M., T. Maruyama, and C.-I. Wu. 1983. Models of evolution of reproductive isolation. Genetics 103:557-579.
49. Nurminsky, D. I., M. V. Nurminskaya, D. De Aguiar, and D. L. Hartl. 1998. Selective sweep of a newly evolved sperm-specific gene in Drosophila. Nature 396:572-575.
50. Orr, H. A. 1995. The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139:1805-1813.
51. Orr, H. A., and S. Irving. 2001. Complex epistasis and the genetic basis of hybrid sterility in the Drosophila pseudoobscura Bogota-USA hybridization. Genetics 158:1089-1100.
52. _. 2005. Segregation distortion in hybrids between the Bogota and USA subspecies of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 169:671-682.
53. Ortells, M. O., and G. E. Barrantes. 1994. A study of genetic distances and variability in several species of the genus Ctenomys (Rodentia: Octodontidae) with special reference to a probable causal role of chromosomes in speciation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 53:189-208.
54. Parker, G. A., and M. E. Begon. 1993. Sperm competition games: sperm size and number under gametic control. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 253:255-262.
55. Pilder, S. H., M. F. Hammer, and L. M. Silver. 1991. A novel mouse chromosome 17 hybrid sterility locus: implications for the origin of t haplotypes. Genetics 129:237-246.
56. Pons, J., and R. G. Gillespie. 2003. Common origin of the satellite DNAs of the Hawaiian spiders of the genus Tetragnatha: evolutionary constraints on the length and nucleotide composition of the repeats. Gene 313:169-177.
57. Prescott, D. M. 2000. Genome gymnastics: unique modes of DNA evolution and processing in ciliates. Nat. Rev. Genet. 1:191-198.
58. Presgraves, D. C. 2002. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in Lepidoptera. Evolution 56:1168-1183.
59. 1 post-zygotic incompatibilities in birds. Evolution 56:2083-2089.
60. Radwan, J. 1996. Intraspecific variation in sperm competition success in the bulb mite: a role for sperm size. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263:855-859.
61. Rice, W. R., and A. K. Chippindale. 2002. The evolution of hybrid infertility: perpetual coevolution between gender-specific and sexually antagonistic genes. Genetica 116:176-188.
62. Sandler, L., and E. Novitsky. 1957. Meiotic drive as an evolutionary force. Am. Nat. 91:105-110.
63. Sasa, M. M., P. T. Chippindale, and N. A. Johnson. 1998. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in frogs. Evolution 52:1811-1820.
64. Schmidt, A., G. Palumbo, M. P. Bozzetti, P. Tritto, S. Pimpinelli, and U. Schaefer. 1999. Genetic and molecular characterization of sting, a gene involved in crystal formation and meiotic drive in the male germ line of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 151:749-760.
65. Tao, Y., and D. L. Hartl. 2003. Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritatiana. 111. Heterogenous accumulation of hybrid incompatibilities, degree of dominance, and implications for Haldane's rule. Evolution 57:2580-2598.
66. Tao, Y., D. L. Hartl, and C. C. Laurie. 2001. Sex-ratio distortion associated with reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:13183-13188.
67. Templeton, A. R. 1991. Mechanisms of speciation: a population genetic approach. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12:23-48.
68. Vershinin, A. V., E. G. Alkhimova, and J. S. Heslop-Harrison. 1996. Molecular diversification of tandemly organized DNA sequences and heterochromatic chromosome regions in some Triticeae species. Chrom. Res. 4:517-525.
69. White, M. J. D. 1978. Modes of speciation. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, CA.
70. Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97-159.
71. Wu, C.-I., and A. W. Davis. 1993. Evolution of postmating reproductive isolation: the composite nature of Haldane's rule and its genetic bases. Am. Nat. 142:187-212.
72. Zangerl, A. R., and J. K. Nitao. 1998. Optimal defence, kin conflict and the distribution of furanocuomarins among offspring of wild parsnip. Evol. Ecol. 12:443-457.