The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performance

Academic Radiology

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 585-595

  Cole, Elodia B ^a   Pisano, Etta D ^a   Zeng, Donglin ^b   Muller, Keith ^b   Aylward, Stephen R ^a   Park, Sungwook ^c   Kuzmiak, Cherie ^a   Koomen, Marcia ^a   Pavic, Dag ^a   Walsh, Ruth ^d   Baker, Jay ^d   Gimenez, Edgardo I ^d   Freimanis, Rita ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^c SAMSUNG Electronics   (South Korea)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital mammography; Image processing; ROC curve

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE EXACERBATION; FEMALE; GRAY SCALE ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; LASER; MACHINE; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TUMOR CALCINOSIS; X RAY FILM;

EID: 20944440174     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.01.017     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. A.J. Shah, J. Wang, T. Yamada Digital mammography a review of technical development and clinical applications Clin Breast Cancer 4 2003 63 70
2. E.D. Pisano, E.B. Cole, B.M. Hemminger Image processing algorithms for digital mammography a pictorial essay Radiographics 20 2000 1479 1491
3. E.D. Pisano, E.B. Cole, S. Major The International Digital Mammography Development Group Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display Radiology 216 2000 820 830
4. A.H. Baydush, C.E. Floyd Jr Improved image quality in digital mammography with image processing Med Phys 27 2000 1503 1508
5. K. Chakrabarti, J.A. Thomas, R.V. Kaczmarek Optimization of viewing conditions and phantom image quality evaluations on GE DMR and full-field digital mammography system J Digit Imaging 13 Suppl 1 2000 226 227
6. W. Qian, L. Li, L. Clarke Digital mammography comparison of adaptive and nonadaptive CAD methods for mass detection Acad Radiol 6 1999 471 480
7. S. Nawano, K. Murakami, N. Moriyama Computer-aided diagnosis in full digital mammography Invest Radiol 34 1999 310 316
8. E.B. Cole, E.D. Pisano, E.O. Kistner Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography effects of image processing and lesion type Radiology 226 2003 153 160
9. B.M. Hemminger Soft copy display requirements for digital mammography J Digit Imaging 16 2003 292 305
10. H.P. Chan, C.J. Vyborny, H. MacMahon Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications Invest Radiol 22 1987 581 589
11. M. De Maeseneer, P. Beeckman, M. Osteaux Detecting clustered microcalcifications in the female breast secondary digitized images versus mammograms J Belge Radiol 75 1992 173 178
12. N. Karssemeijer, J.T. Frieling, J.H. Hendriks Spatial resolution in digital mammography Invest Radiol 28 1993 413 419
13. S.A. Feig, M.J. Yaffe Digital mammography Radiographics 18 1998 893 901
14. W.E. Barlow, C.D. Lehman, Y. Zheng Performance of diagnostic mammography for women with signs or symptoms of breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 94 2002 1151 1159
15. C.M. Kuzmiak, G.A. Millnamow, B. Qaqish Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to diagnostic accuracy of lesion characterization in breast tissue biopsy specimens Acad Radiol 9 2002 1378 1382
16. J.M. Lewin, R.E. Hendrick, C.J. D'Orsi Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection results of 4,945 paired examinations Radiology 218 2001 873 880