High-throughput proteomics using Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry

Expert Review of Proteomics

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 87-95

  Qian, Wei Jun ^a   Camp II, David G ^a   Smith, Richard D ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accurate mass and time tag; FTICR; High throughput; Liquid chromatography; Mass spectrometry; Proteomics; Stable isotope labeling

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; ION CYCLOTRON RESONANCE MASS SPECTROMETRY; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; INSTRUMENTATION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; TIME;

PROTEOME;

ANIMALS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; HUMANS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 20544459308     PISSN: 14789450     EISSN: 17448387     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/14789450.1.1.87     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Aebersold R, Goodlett DR. Mass spectrometiy in proteomics. Chem. Rev. 101, 269-295 (2001). Comprehensive review of mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics.
2. Ferguson PL, Smith RD. Proteome analysis by mass spectrometry. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 32, 399-424 (2003).
3. Godovac-Zimmerman J, Brown LR. Perspectives for mass spectrometry and functional proteomics. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 20, 1-57 (2001).
4. Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422, 198-207 (2003) Recent advances and perspectives in MS-based proteomics.
5. Shevchenko A, Jeasen ON, Podtelejnikov AV et al. Linking genome and proteome by mass spectrometry: large-scale identification of yeast proteins from two dimensional gels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 14440-14445 (1996).
6. Gygi SP, Corthals GL, Zhang Y, Rochon Y, Aebersold R. Evaluation of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis-based proteome analysis technology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 9390-9395 (2000).
7. Shen Y, Moore RJ, Zhao R et al. High-efficiency on-line solid-phase extraction coupling to 15-150-microm-i.d. column liquid chromatography for proteomic analysis. Anal. Chm. 75, 3264-3273 (2003). Delineation and demonstration of the importance of high-efficiency liquid chromatography (LC) separations of complex peptide matures for proteome analyses.
8. Shen Y, Tolic N, Masselon C et al. Ultrasensitive proteomics using high-efficiency on-line micro-SPE-nano LC-nanoESI MS and MS/MS. Anal. Chem. 76, 144-154 (2004).
9. Wolters DA, Washburn MP, Yates JR. An automated multidimensional protein identification technology for shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem. 73, 5683-5690 (2001).
10. Peng J, Elias JE, Thoreen CC, Licklider LJ, Gygi SP. Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome. J. Proteome Res. 2, 43-50 (2003).
11. Washburn MP, Wolters D, Yates JR. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nature Biotechnol. 19, 242-247 (2001). First report using 2D LC and tandem MS for large-scale proteomics.
12. Koller A, Washburn MP, Lange BM et al. Proteomic survey of metabolic pathways in rice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 11969-11974 (2002).
13. Florens L, Washburn MP, Raine JD et al. A proteomic view of the Plasmodium falciparum life cycle. Nature 419, 520-526 (2002).
14. Mawuenyega KG, Kaji H, Yamuchi Y et al. Large-scale identification of Caenorhabditis elegans proteins by multidimensional liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 2, 23-35 (2003).
15. Kislinger T, Rahman K, Radulovic D et al. PRISM, a generic large scale proteomic investigation strategy for mammals. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2, 96-106 (2003).
16. Jacobs JM, Mottaz HM, Yu LR et al. Multidimensional proteome analysis of human mammary epithelial cells. J. Proteome Res. 3, 68-75 (2004).
17. Marshall AG, Hendrickson CL, Jackson GS. Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry: a primer. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 17, 1-35 (1998).
18. Belov ME, Gorshkov MV, Udseth HR et al. Initial implementation of an electrodynamic ion funnel with FTICR mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 11, 19-23 (2000).
19. Bruce JE, Anderson GA, Wen J, Harkewicz R, Smith RD. High mass measurement accuracy for 100% sequence coverage of enzymatically digested bovine serum albumin from an ESI-FTICR mass spectrum. Anal. Chem. 71, 2595-2599 (1999).
20. Marshall AG. Milestones in fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry technique development. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 200, 331-356 (2000).
21. Pasa-Tolic L, Harkewicz R, Anderson GA et al. Increased proteome coverage based upon high performance separations and DREAMS FTICR mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 13, 954-963 (2002).
22. Zubarev RA, Kelleher NL, McLafferty FW. Electron capture dissociation of multiply charged protein cations. A nonergodic process. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 3265-3266 (1998).
23. Belov ME, Anderson GA, Wingerd MA et al. An automated high performance capillary liquid chromatography-Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer for high-throughput proteomics. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 15, 212-232 (2004).
24. Shen Y, Tolic N, Zhao R et al. High-throughput proteomics using high efficiency multiple-capillary liquid chromatography with on-line high performance ESI-FTICR mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 73, 3011-3021 (2001).
25. Tabb DL, MacCoss MJ, Wu CC, Anderson SD, Yates JR. Similarity among tandem mass spectra from proteomic experiments: detection, significance and utility. Anal. Chem. 75, 2470-2477 (2003).
26. Smith RD, Anderson GA, Lipton MS et al. An accurate mass tag strategy for quantitative and high throughput proteome measurements. Proteomics 2, 513-523 (2002). Description of the accurate mass tag strategy and its potential for high-throughput and quantitative proteomics.
27. Petritis K, Kangas LJ, Ferguson PL et al. Use of artificial neural networks for the prediction of peptide liquid chromatography elution times in proteome analyses. Anal. Chem. 75, 1039-1048 (2003).
28. Lipton MS, Pasa-Tolic L, Anderson GA et al. Global analysis of the Deinococcus radiodurans R1 proteome by using accurate mass tags. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 11049-11054 (2002). First demonstration of applying the accurate mass and time (AMT) tag strategy for large-scale proteomics.
29. Strittmatter EF, Ferguson PL, Tang K, Smith RD. Proteome analyses using accurate mass and elution time peptide tags with capillary LC time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 14, 980-991 (2003).
30. Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA et al. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nature Biotechnol. 17, 994-999 (1999). First report of a chemical reaction-based stable-isotope labeling technique for quantitative proteome analysis.
31. Oda Y, Huang K, Cross FR, Cowburn D, Chait BT. Accurate quantitation of protein expression and site-specific phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 6591-6596 (1999).
32. Pasa-Tolic L, Jensen PK, Anderson GA et al. High throughput proteome-wide precision measurements of protein expression using mass spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 7949-7950 (1999).
33. Yao X, Freas A, Ramirez J, Demirev P, Fenselau C. Protelytic 180 labeling for comparative proteomics: model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus. Anal. Chem. 73, 2836-2842 (2001).
34. Veenstra TD, Martinovic S, Anderson GA, Pasa-Tolic L, Smith RD. Proteome analysis using selective incorporation of isotopically labeled amino acids. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 11, 78-82 (2000).
35. Chen X, Smith LM, Bradbury EM. Site-specific mass tagging with stable isotopes in proteins for accurate and efficient protein identification. Anal. Chem. 72, 1134-1143 (2000).
36. Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 376-386 (2002).
37. Berger SJ, Lee SW, Anderson GA et al. High throughput global peptide proteomic analysis by combining stable isotope amino acid labeling and data-dependent multiplexed-MS/MS. Anal. Chem. 74, 4994-5000 (2002).
38. Smith RD, Anderson GA, Lipton MS et al. The use of accurate mass tags for high throughput microbial proteomics. OMICS 6, 61-90 (2002).
39. Zhang R, Regnier FE. Minimizing resolution of isotopically coded peptides in comparative proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 1, 139-147 (2002).
40. Borisov OV, Goshe MB, Conrads TP et al. Low energy collision-induced dissociation fragmentation analysis of cysteinyl-modified peptides. Anal. Chem. 74, 2284-2292 (2002).
41. Yu LR, Conrads TP, Uo T et al. Evaluation of the acid-cleavable isotope-coded affinity tag reagents: application to camptothecin-treated cortical neurons. J. Proteome Res. (In Press).
42. Zhou HL, Ranish JA, Watts JD, Aebersold R. Quantitative proteome analysis by solid-phase isotope tagging and mass spectrometry. Nature Biotechnol. 19, 512-515 (2002).
43. Qiu Y, Sousa EA, Hewick RM, Wang JH. Acid-labile isotope-coded extractants: a class of reagents for quantitative mass spectrometric analysis of complex protein mixtures. Anal. Chem. 74, 4969-4979 (2002).
44. Chakraborty A, Regnier FE. Global internal standard technology for comparative proteomics. J. Chromatogr. A 949, 173-184 (2002).
45. Zhou H, Watts JD, Aebersold R. A systematic approach to the analysis of protein phosphorylation. Nature Biotechnol. 19, 375-378 (2001).
46. Qian WJ, Goshe MB, Camp DG et al. Phosphoprotein isotope-coded solid-phase tag approach for enrichment and quantitative analysis of phosphopeptides from complex mixtures. Anal. Chem. 75, 5441-5450 (2003).
47. Zhang H, Li XJ, Martin DB, Aerbersold R. Identification and quantification of N-linked glycoproteins using hydrazide chemistry, stable isotope labeling and mass spectrometry. Nature Biotechnol. 21, 660-665 (2003).
48. Wells L, Vosseller K, Cole RN et al. Mapping sites of O-GlcNAc modification using affinity tags for serine and threonine post-translational modifications. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 791-804 (2002).
49. 18O- labeling for comparative proteomics: Model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus. Anal. Chem. 73, 2836-2842 (2001).
50. 18O labeling: a tool for proteomics. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 15, 2456-2465 (2001).
51. 18O exchange of truncated peptide substrates. J. Proteome Res. 2, 147-152 (2003).
52. 18O exchange for comparative proteomics: tandem mass spectrometry comparison using MALDI-TOF, ESI-QTOF and ESI-ion trap mass spectrometers. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 14, 704-718 (2003). Demonstrated the efficiency of trypsin-catalyzed oxygen exchange reaction for global labeling of tryptic peptides and the potential use in comparative proteomics.
53. 18O labeling and the accurate mass and time tag approach. (2004) (In Press).
54. Anderson NL, Anderson NG. The human plasma proteome: history, character and diagnostic prospects. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 1, 845-867 (2002).
55. Smith RD, Shen Y, Tang K. Ultrasensitive and quantitative analyses from combined separations-mass spectrometry for the characterization of proteomes. Acc. Chem. Res. (In Press).
56. Stoeckli M, Chaurand P, Hallahan DE, Caprioli RM. Imaging mass spectrometry: a new technology for the analysis of protein expression in mammalian tissues. Nature Med. 7493-7496, 493-496 (2001).
57. Lee SW, Berger S, Martinovic S et al. Direct mass spectrometric analysis of intact proteins of the yeast large ribosomal subunit using capillary LC/FTICR. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5942-5947 (2002).
58. Meng FY, Cargile BJ, Patrie SM et al. Processing complex mixtures of intact proteins for direct analysis by mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 74, 2923-2929 (2002).
59. Kelleher NL, Lin HY, Valaskovic GA et al. Top down versus bottom up protein characterization by tandem high-resolution mass spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 806-812 (1999).
60. Ge Y, Lawhorn BG, ElNaggar M et al. Top down characterization of larger proteins (45 kDa) by electron capture dissociation mass spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 672-678 (2002).