Assessing genetic variation to predict the breeding value of winter triticale cultivars and lines

Journal of Applied Genetics

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 125-131

  Góral, Halina ^a   Tyrka, Mirosław ^b   Spiss, Ludwik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE IN KRAKOW   (Poland)

^b Akademia Polonijna w Czestochowie   (Poland)

Author keywords

AFLP; Genetic diversity; Heterosis; Phenotypic diversity; Triticale

Indexed keywords

AGRONOMIC TRAIT; AGRONOMY; AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CROSS BREEDING; CULTIVAR; GENETIC LINE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC SIMILARITY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GRAIN; HETEROSIS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GENETICS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TRITICALE; WEIGHT;

AGRICULTURE; BREEDING; CEREALS; FORECASTING; GENETIC MARKERS; HYBRID VIGOR; NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TECHNIQUES; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION (GENETICS); VARIATION (GENETICS);

TRITICOSECALE;

EID: 20544447318     PISSN: 12341983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barbosa-Neto JF, Sorrells ME, Cisar G, 1996. Prediction of heterosis in wheat using coefficient of parentage and RFLP-based estimates of genetic relationship. Genome 39: 1142-1149.
2. Bernardo R, 1992. Relationship between single cross performance and molecular marker heterozygosity. Theor Appl Genet 83: 628-634.
3. Bernardo R, 1994. Prediction of maize single-cross performance using RFLPs and information from related hybrids. Crop Sci 34: 20-25.
4. Bohn M, Uzt HF, Melchinger AE, 1999. Genetic similarities among winter wheat cultivars determined on the basis of RFLPs, AFLPs, and SSRs and their use for predicting progeny variance. Crop Sci 39: 228-237.
5. Boppenmaier J, Melchinger AE, Seitz G, Geiger HH, Herrmann RG, 1993. Genetic diversity for RFLP in European maize inbreeds: III. Performance of crosses within versus between heterotic groups for grain traits. Plant Breeding 111: 217-226.
6. Charcosset A, Lefort-Buson M, Gallais A, 1991. Relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci: a theoretical computation. Theor Appl Genet 81: 571-575.
7. 2 heterosis in winter wheat crosses. Theor Appl Genet 79: 241-250.
8. Diers BW, McVetty PBE, Osborn TC, 1996. Relationship between heterosis and genetic distance based on RFLP markers in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Crop Sci 36: 79-83.
9. Fabrizius MA, Busch RH, Khan K, Huckle L, 1998. Genetic diversity and heterosis of spring wheat crosses. Crop Sci 38: 1108-1112.
10. Góral H, 2002. Biologiczno-hodowlane aspekty wykorzystania heterozji upszenżyta (x Triticosecale Wittmack). [Biological-breeding aspects of utilization of heterosis in triticale (x Triticosecale Wittmack)] Zesz Nauk Akademii Rolniczej w Krakowie 283: 1-116.
11. Góral H, Wȩgrzyn S, Spiss L, 1999. Heterosis and combining ability in spring triticale (x Triticosecale Wittm.). Plant Breed Seed Sci 43: 25-34.
12. Liu Z-Q, Pei Y, Pu Z-J, 1999. Relationship between hybrid performance and genetic diversity based on RAPD markers in wheat, Triticum aestivum L. Plant Breed 118: 119-123.
13. Martin JM, Talbert LE, Lanning KR, Blake NK, 1995. Hybrid performance in wheat as related to parental diversity. Crop Sci 35: 104-108.
14. Milligan BG, 1992. Plant DNA isolation. In: Hoelzel AR, ed. Molecular analysis of populations: a practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford, UK: 59-88.
15. Nei M, Li WH, 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76: 5269-5273.
16. 2 hybrids. Plant Breeding 120: 351-353.
17. Oettler G, Burger H, Melchinger AE, 2003. Heterosis and combining ability for grain yield and other agronomic traits in winter triticale. Plant Breeding 122: 318-321.
18. Rohlf FJ, 2001. NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.10q, Exeter Publishing Ltd., Setauket, N.Y.
19. Samsuddin AKM, 1985. Genetic diversity in relation to heterosis and combining ability in spring wheat. Theor Appl Genet 70: 306-308.
20. 1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis, and RFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 80: 833-840.
21. Stuber CW, Lincoln SE, Wolff DW, Helentjaris T, Lande ES, 1992. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132: 823-839.
22. Subudhi PK, Nandi S, Casal C, Virmani SS, Huang N, 1998. Classification of rice germplasm: III. High-resolution fingerprinting of cytoplasmic genetic male-sterile (CMS) lines with AFLP. Theor Appl Genet 96: 941-949.
23. Tyrka M, Dziadczyk P, Hortyński J, 2002. Simplified AFLP procedure as a tool for identification of strawberry cultivars and advanced breeding lines. Euphytica 125: 273-280.
24. Tyrka M, Mikulski W, 2003. Porównanie zmienności fenotypowej i genotypowej odmian i rodów pszenicy zwyczajnej. [Comparison of phenotypic and genotypic variation of bread wheat cultivars and lines.] II Ogólnopolska Konferencja. Zasoby genowe roślin w ochronie róznorodności biologicznej. [2nd Polish Conference: Genetic resources of plants in biodiversity conservation.] 22-23 Oct 2003, Skierniewice: 75.