Genetic diversity and heterosis of spring wheat crosses

Crop Science

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 1108-1112

  Fabrizius, Martin A ^a   Busch, Robert H ^b   Khan, Khalil ^c   Huckle, Linda ^c  

^a Pioneer Hi Bred International Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENETIC DIVERSITY; HETEROSIS; PHENOTYPE; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GENETICS; POPULATION GENETICS;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 0031821562     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800040036x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bushuk, W., and R.R. Zillman. 1978. Wheat cultivar identification by gliadin electrophoregrams. I. Apparatus, method and nomenclature. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58:505-515.
2. Barbosa-Neto, J.F., M.E. Sorrells, and G. Cisar. 1996. Prediction of heterosis in wheat using coefficient of parentage and RFLP-based estimates of genetic relationship. Genome 39:1142-1149.
3. Chan, J.K., R. Cutshaw, K.V. Kotchou, and K.J. Lafredo. 1994. Molecular analyst. Version 2.0 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Richmond CA.
4. Cowen, N.M., and K.J. Frey. 1987a, Relationship between genealogical distance and breeding behavior in oats (Avena sativa L.). Euphytica 36:413-424.
5. Cowen, N.M., and K.J. Frey. 1987b. Relationships between three measures of genetic distance and breeding behavior in oats (Avena sativa L.). Genome 29:97-106.
6. Cox, T.S., G.L. Lookhart, D.E. Walker, L.G. Harrell, L.D. Albers, and D.M. Rodgers. 1985. Genetic relationships among hard red winter wheat cultivars as evaluated by pedigree analysis and gliadin polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic patterns. Crop Sci. 25:529-532.
7. 2 heterosis in winter wheat crosses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 79: 241-250.
8. Genstat 5 Committee. 1993. p. 539-583. In Genstat 5 release 3 reference manual. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England,
9. Khan, K., R. Frohberg, T. Olson, and L. Huckle. 1989. Inheritance of gluten protein components of high-protein hard red spring wheat lines derived from Triticum turgidum var. dicoccoides. Cereal Chem. 66:397-401.
10. Martin, J.M., L.E. Talbert, S.P. Lanning, and N.K. Blake. 1995. Hybrid performance in wheat as related to parental diversity. Crop Sci. 35:104-108.
11. McIntosh, R.A., G.E. Hart, K.M. Devos, and M.D. Gale. 1997. Catalog of gene symbols for wheat. Annu. Wheat Newsl. 43:380-404.
12. Nei, M., and W.H. Li. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 76:5269-5273.
13. Patterson, H.D., and R. Thompson. 1971. Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58:545-554.
14. Picard, B., G. Branlard, F.X. Oury, P. Berard, and M. Rousset. 1992. A study of genetic diversity in wheat. II. Application to the prediction of heterosis. Agronomie 12:683-690.
15. Rohlf, F.J. 1990. NTSYS-pc; manual. Exeter Software, Setquket, NY.
16. Shamsuddin, A.K.M. 1985. Genetíc díversity ín relation to heterosis and combining ability in spring wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 70: 306-308.
17. Sneath, P.H.A., and R.R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco.
18. Sorrells, M.E., M.M. Nachit, J. Barbosa, E. Autrizue, and H. Ketata. 1994. Relationships among 81 durum genotypes based on RFLPs, gliadins, parentage, and quality traits. In N. Fonzo et al. (ed.) Proc. Seminar on Durum Wheat Quality in the Mediterranean Region, Zaragosa, Spain. 17-19 Nov. 1993. Instituto Agronomico Mediterraneo de Zaragosa, Zaragosa, Spain.
19. van Beuningen, L.T., and R.H. Busch. 1997a. Genetic diversity among North American spring wheat cultivars: I. Analysis of the coefficient of parentage matrix. Crop Sci. 37:570-579.
20. van Beuningen, L.T., and R.H. Busch. 1997b. Genetic diversity among North American spring wheat cultivars: III. Cluster analysis based on quantitative morphological traits. Crop Sci. 37:981-988.