Closed laboratories with embedded instructional research design for CS1

Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 297-301

  Soh, Leen Kiat ^a   Samal, Ashok ^a   Person, Suzette ^b   Nugent, Gwen ^b   Lang, Jeff ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Closed Laboratories; Cooperative Learning; Instructional Design

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SCIENCE; CURRICULA; LEARNING SYSTEMS; RESEARCH LABORATORIES;

CLOSED LABORATORIES; COMPUTER ENGINEERING; COOPERATING LEARNING; INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN;

EMBEDDED SYSTEMS;

EID: 20444500998     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1047344.1047448     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. R. McCauley, W. Parrs, G. Pothering, and C. Starr (2003). A Proposal to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Closed Laboratories in the Computer Science Curriculum, J. Computing Sciences in Colleges, 19(3):191-198.
2. ACM/IEEE Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula Staff, Computing Curricula 2001: Computer Science, IEEE Press, 2002.
3. P.J. Denning, D. E. Comer, D. Gries, M. C. Mulder, A. Tucker, A. J. Turner, and P. R. Young (1989). Computing as a Discipline, CACM, 32(1):9-23.
4. A. Tucker, A., et al., (1991). Computing Curricula 1991: Report of the ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum Task Force", ACM Press.
5. B.C. Parker, and J. D. McGregor (1995). A Goal-Oriented Approach to Laboratory Development and Implementation, SIGSCE'95, Nashville, TN, pp. 92-96.
6. M.V. Doran and D. D. Langan (1995) A Cognitive-Based Approach to Introductory Computer Science Courses: Lessons Learned", SIGCSE'95, Nashville, TN, pp. 218-222.
7. B.S. Bloom, B. B. Mesia, and D. R. Krathwohl (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (two vols: The Affective Domain & The Cognitive Domain), David McKay, New York.
8. A.N. Kumar (2003). The Effects of Closed Labs in Computer Science I: An Assessment, J. Computing Sciences in Colleges, 18(5):40-48.
9. M. Thweatt (1994). CS1 Closed Lab vs. Open Lab Experiment, SIGCSE'94, Phoenix, AZ, pp. 80-82.
10. R. Lischner (2001). Explorations: Structured labs for First-Time Programmers", SIGCSE'2001, Charlotte, NC, pp. 154-158.
11. J. Parker, R. Cupper, C. Kelemen, D. Molnar, and G. Scragg (1990). Laboratories in the Computer Science Curriculum, Computer Science Education, 1(3):205-221.
12. S. R. Oliver, and J. Dalbey (1994). A Software Development Process Laboratory for CS1 and CS2, SIGCSE'94, Phoenix, AZ, pp. 169-173.
13. A. Joseph and M. Payne (2003). Group Dynamics and Collaborative Group Performance", SIGCSE'2003, Reno, NV, pp. 368-371.
14. T. Gatfield (1999). Examining Student Satisfaction with Group Projects and Peer Assessment, Assessment and Evolution in Higher Education, 24(4):365-377.
15. M. Malinger (1998). Collaborative Learning Across Borders: Dealing with Student Resistance, J. Excellence in College Teaching, 9(1):53-68.
16. Z. Qin, D. Johnson, and R. Johnson (1995). Cooperative versus Competitive Efforts and Problem Solving, Review of Educational Research, 65(2):129-143.
17. K. A. Yerion and J. A. Rinehart (1995). Guidelines for Collaborative Learning in Computer Science, SIGCSE Bulletin, 27(4):29-34.
18. J. C. Prey (1995). Cooperative Learning in an Undergraduate Computer Science Curriculum, FIE'95 Conference.
19. rd ed.), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
20. M. Jensen, D. W. Johnson and R. T. Johnson (2002). Impact of Positive Interdependence during Electronic Quizzes on Discourse and Achievement, J. Educational Research, 95:161-166, 2002.
21. P. R. Pintrich and E. V. DeGroot (1990). Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance, J. of Educational Psychology, 82(1):33-40.