Relationships among non-native plants, diversity of plants and butterflies, and adequacy of spatial sampling

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 157-166

  Fleishman, Erica ^a   Mac Nally, Ralph ^b   Murphy, Dennis D ^c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive management; Biotic homogenization; Ecosystem function; Hierarchical partitioning; Invasive species; Monitoring; Restoration; Salt cedar (Tamarix ramosissima); Sampling effects; Species richness

Indexed keywords

BIOINDICATOR; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; BUTTERFLY; MONITORING; PLANT COMMUNITY; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SAMPLING;

MUDDY RIVER; NEVADA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

PAPILIONOIDEA; TAMARIX RAMOSISSIMA;

EID: 20444398511     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00479.x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Arms K, Feeney P, Lederhouse RC. 1974. Sodium: stimulus for puddling behavior by tiger swallowtail butterflies. Science 185: 372-374.
2. Ashley MV, Willson MF, Pergams ORW, O'Dowd DJ, Gende SM, Brown JS. 2003. Evolutionarily enlightened management. Biological Conservation 111: 115-123.
3. Blair RB. 1999. Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity. Ecological Applications 9: 164-170.
4. Boggs CL. 1997. Dynamics of reproductive allocation from juvenile and adult feeding: radiotracer studies. Ecology 78: 192-202.
5. Boggs CL, Jackson LA. 1991. Mud puddling by butterflies is not a simple matter. Ecological Entomology 16: 123-127.
6. Boggs CL, Ross CL. 1993. The effect of adult food limitation on life history traits in Speyeria mormonia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Ecology 74: 433-441.
7. Boughton DA. 1999. Empirical evidence for complex source-sink dynamics with alternative states in a butterfly metapopulation. Ecology 80: 2727-2739.
8. Carroll SS, Pearson DL. 1998. Spatial modeling of butterfly species richness using tiger beetles (Cicindelidae) as a bioindicator taxon. Ecological Applications 8: 531-543.
9. Casgrain P, Legendre P. 2001. The R package for multivariate and spatial analysis, Version 4.0. D5. Université de Montréal. http://www.fas.umontreal.ca/BIOL/legendre/
10. Chevan A, Sutherland M. 1991. Hierarchical partitioning. The American Statistician 45: 90-96.
11. Cleverly JR, Smith SD, Sala A, Devitt DA. 1997. Invasive capacity of Tamarix ramosissima in a Mojave Desert floodplain: the role of drought. Oecologia 111: 12-18.
12. Covington WW, Fulé PZ, Moore MM, Hart SC, Kolb TE, Mast JN, Sackett SS, Wagner MR. 1997. Restoring ecosystem health in ponderosa pine forests of the southwest. Journal of Forestry 95: 23-29.
13. Cremer K. 1999. Willow management for Australian rivers. Natural Resources Management Special Issue: 1-22.
14. Douglas ME, Endler JA. 1982. Quantitative matrix comparisons in ecological and evolutionary investigations. Journal of Theoretical Biology 99: 777-795.
15. Eby LA, Fagan WF, Minckley WL. 2003. Variability and dynamics of a desert stream community. Ecological Applications 13: 1566-1579.
16. Ehrlich PR, Raven PH. 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586-608.
17. Fleishman E, Austin GT, Brussard PF, Murphy DD. 1999. A comparison of butterfly communities in native and agricultural riparian habitats in the Great Basin. Biological Conservation 89: 209-218.
18. Fleishman E, McDonal N, Mac Nally R, Murphy DD, Walters J, Floyd T. 2003. Effects of floristics, physiognomy, and non-native vegetation on riparian bird communities in a Mojave Desert watershed. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 484-490.
19. Fleishman E, Ray C, Sjögren-Gulve P, Boggs CL, Murphy DD. 2002. Assessing the relative roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics. Conservation Biology 16: 706-716.
20. Fulé PZ, Covington WW. 1999. Fire regime changes in La Michilía Biosphere Reserve, Durango, Mexico. Conservation Biology 13: 640-652.
21. Futuyma DJ, Slatkin M, eds. 1983. Coevolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
22. Gabbe AP, Robinson SK, Brawn JD. 2002. Tree-species preferences of foraging insectivorous birds: implications for floodplain restoration. Conservation Biology 16: 462-470.
23. Gilbert LE, Singer MC. 1973. Dispersal and gene flow in a butterfly species. The American Naturalist 107: 58-72.
24. Hawkins BA, Porter EE. 2003. Does herbivore diversity depend on plant diversity? The case of California butterflies. The American Naturalist 161: 40-49.
25. Higgins SI, Richardson DM, Cowling RM, Trinder-Smith TH. 1999. Predicting the landscape-scale distribution of alien plants and their threat to plant diversity. Conservation Biology 13: 303-313.
26. Holl KD. 1995. Nectar resources and their influence on butterfly communities on reclaimed coal surface mines. Restoration Ecology 3: 76-85.
27. Holl KD. 1996. The effect of coal surface mine reclamation on diurnal lepidopteran conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 225-236.
28. Janzen DH. 1973. Sweep samples of tropical foliage insects: effects of season, vegetation types, elevation, time of day, and insularity. Ecology 54: 687-708.
29. Jenkins KM, Boulton AJ. 2003. Connectivity in a dryland river: short-term aquatic microinvertebrate recruitment following floodplain inundation. Ecology 84: 2708-2723.
30. Kinzig AP, Pacala SW, Tilman D, eds. 2001. The functional consequences of biodiversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31. Kremen C, Colwell RK, Erwin TL, Murphy DD, Noss RF, Sanjayan MA. 1993. Terrestrial arthropod assemblages: their use in conservation planning. Conservation Biology 7: 796-808.
32. Kuussaari M, Nieminen M, Hanski I. 1996. An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia. Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 791-801.
33. Lake PS. 1995. Of floods and droughts: river and stream ecosystems of Australia. In: Cushing CE, Cummins KW, Minshall GW, eds. River and stream ecosystems 22. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 659-690.
34. Lake PS. 2001. On the maturing of restoration: linking ecological research and restoration. Ecological Management and Restoration 2: 110-115.
35. Levine JM. 2000. Relating local process to community pattern. Science 288: 852-854.
36. Lockwood JL, McKinney ML, eds. 2001. Biotic homogenization. The loss of diversity through invasion and extinction. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
37. Lytle DA, Poff NL. 2004. Adaptation to natural flow regimes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 94-100.
38. Mac Nally R. 2000. Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography, and ecology: the distinction between - and reconciliation of - 'predictive' and 'explanatory' models. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 655-671.
39. Mac Nally R, Walsh C. 2004. Hierarchical partitioning public-domain software. Biodiversity and Conservation 13: 659-660.
40. Mantel N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27: 209-220.
41. McCoy ED. 1990. The distribution of insects along elevational gradients. Oikos 58: 313-322.
42. McKinney ML. 2002. Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52: 883-890.
43. Meretsky VJ, Wegner DL, Stevens LE. 2000. Balancing endangered species and ecosystems: a case study of adaptive management in Grand Canyon. Environmental Management 25: 579-586.
44. Mills LS, Soulé ME, Doak DF. 1993. The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation. Bioscience 43: 219-224.
45. Minckley WL, Meffe GK. 1987. In: Heins DC, Matthews WJ, eds. Evolutionary and community ecology of North American stream fishes. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 93-104.
46. Moilanen A, Hanski I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79: 2503-2515.
47. Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ. 2000. Invasive species in a changing world. Washington DC: Island Press.
48. Moritz C. 2002. Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Systematic Biology 51: 238-254.
49. Murphy DD. 1983. Nectar sources as constraints on the distribution of egg masses by the checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas chalcedona (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Environmental Entomology 12: 463-466.
50. Murphy DD, Menninger MS, Ehrlich PR. 1984. Nectar source distribution as a determinant of oviposition host species in Euphydryas chalcedona. Oecologia 62: 269-271.
51. Murphy DD, Wilcox BA. 1986. Butterfly diversity in natural habitat fragments: a test of the validity of vertebrate-based management. In: Verner J, Morrison ML, Ralph CJ, eds. Wildlife 2000: modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 287-292.
52. New TR, Pyle RM, Thomas JA, Thomas CD, Hammond PC. 1995. Butterfly conservation management. Annual Review of Entomology 40: 57-83.
53. Olden JD, Poff NL. 2003. Toward a mechanistic understanding and prediction of biotic homogenization. The American Naturalist 162: 442-460.
54. Olden JD, Poff NL, Douglas MR, Douglas ME, Fausch KD. 2004. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 18-24.
55. Palumbi SR. 2001. Humans as the world's greatest evolutionary force. Science 293: 1786-1790.
56. Parmesan C. 1996. Climate effects on species range. Nature 382: 765-766.
57. Parmesan C, Ryrholm N, Stefanescu C, Hill JK, Thomas CD, Descimon H, Huntley B, Kaila L, Kulberg J, Tammaru T, Tennett WJ, Thomas JA, Warren M. 1999. Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399: 579-583.
58. Peterson MA. 1997. Host plant phenology and butterfly dispersal: causes and consequences of uphill movement. Ecology 78: 167-180.
59. Rejmanek M. 2000. Invasive plants: approaches and predictions. Austral Ecology 25: 497-506.
60. Richter BD, Richter HE. 2000. Prescribing flood regimes to sustain riparian ecosystems along meandering rivers. Conservation Biology 14: 1467-1478.
61. Rodrigues JP, Pearson DL, Barrera R. 1998. A test for the adequacy of bioindicator taxa: are tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) appropriate indicators for monitoring the degradation of tropical forests in Venezuela? Biological Conservation 83: 69-76.
62. Rood SB, Gourley CR, Ammon EM, Heki LG, Klotz JR, Morrison ML, Mosley D, Scoppettone GG, Swanson S, Wagner PL. 2003. Flows for floodplain forests: a successful riparian restoration. Bioscience 53: 647-656.
63. Sax DF, Gaines SD, Brown JH. 2002. Species invasions exceed extinctions on islands worldwide: a comparative study of plants and birds. The American Naturalist 160: 766-783.
64. Scott JA. 1986. The butterflies of North America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
65. Sher AA, Marshall DL, Gilbert SA. 2000. Competition between native Populus deltoides and invasive Tamarix ramosissima and the implications for reestablishing flooding disturbance. Conservation Biology 14: 1744-1754.
66. Simberloff D. 1981. Community effects of introduced species. In: Nitecki MH, ed. Biotic crises in ecological and evolutionary time. Chicago, IL: Academic Press, 53-81.
67. Smith DI. 1998. Water in Australia: resources and management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68. Smith T, Starr B. 1999. Willows - friend or foe? An historical perspective. In: Rutherford I, Bartley R, eds. The challenge of rehabilitating Australia's streams. Monash University, Adelaide, Australia: Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, 573-577.
69. Soulé ME, Estes JA, Berger J, Martinez del Rio C. 2003. Ecological effectiveness: conservation goals for interactive species. Conservation Biology 17: 1238-1250.
70. Stockwell CA, Hendry AP, Kinnison MT. 2003. Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 94-101.
71. Swengel AB. 1998. Effects of management on butterfly abundance in tallgrass prairie and pine barrens. Biological Conservation 83: 77-89.
72. Swengel AB. 2001. A literature review of insect responses to fire, compared to other conservation managements of open habitat. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 1141-1169.
73. Walters C, Korman J, Stevens LE, Gold B. 2000. Ecosystem modeling for evaluation of adaptive management policies in the Grand Canyon. Conservation Ecology 4 (2): http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss2/art1
74. Williams JA, West CJ. 2000. Environmental weeds in Australia and New Zealand: issues and approaches to management. Austral Ecology 25: 425-444.
75. Zavaleta ES, Hobbs RJ, Mooney HA. 2001. Viewing invasive species removal in a whole-ecosystem context. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 454-459.