Managing neurologic complications in cervical spine surgery

Current Opinion in Orthopaedics

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 169-177

  Freedman, Brett A ^a   Potter, Benjamin K ^a   Kuklo, Timothy R ^a,b  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical spine surgery; Intraoperative; Neuromonitoring; Secondary injury; Spinal cord injury

Indexed keywords

GANGLIOSIDE GM1; LIDOCAINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; METHYLPREDNISOLONE; NALOXONE; OPIATE ANTAGONIST; STEROID; TIRILAZAD;

ALGORITHM; ARTERY INJURY; BRADYCARDIA; CERVICAL SPINE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EDEMA; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MORTALITY; NERVE ROOT INJURY; NEUROGENIC SHOCK; NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATION; NEUROPROTECTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT MONITORING; PATIENT POSITIONING; PATIENT SELECTION; PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENT LARYNGEAL NERVE PALSY; REVIEW; SHOCK; SPINAL ARTERY; SPINAL CORD BLOOD FLOW; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; SPINAL CORD INJURY; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE SURGERY; SURGICAL APPROACH; VERTEBRAL ARTERY;

EID: 20344365589     PISSN: 10419918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.bco.0000161722.07761.ff     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Houten JK, Cooper PR. Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Neurosurgery 2003; 52:1081-1088.
2. Bhardwaj A, Long DM, Ducker TB, Toung TJK. Neurologic deficits after cervical laminectomy in the prone position. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2001; 13:314-319.
3. Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, et al. Neurologic complications of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine 1991; 16:1277-1282.
4. Lundy DW, Murray HH. Neurological deterioration after posterior wiring on the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79:948-951.
5. Fessler RG, Steck JC, Giovanini MA. Anterior cervical corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurgery 1998; 43:257-265.
6. O'Toole JE, Olson TJ, Kaiser MG. Surgical management of dissociated motor loss following complex cervical spine reconstruction. Spine 2004; 29:E56-E60. The authors provide a case example and an excellent review of this specific and not too rare neurologic complication following multisegment decompression for cervical myelopathy from either an anterior or posterior approach. Previously, non-operative management had been strictly advocated, resulting in partial or complete resolution of symptoms in weeks to months. These authors performed foraminotomies successfully to treat their patient who developed bilateral C5 and C6 dissociated motor radiculopathy following anterior/posterior decompression and fusion.
7. Saunders RL. On the pathogenesis of the radiculopathy complication multi-level corpectomy. Neurosurgery 1995; 37:408-423.
8. Weisberg NK, Spengler DM, Netterville JL Stretch-induced nerve injury as a cause of paralysis secondary to the anterior cervical approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 116:317-326.
9. Netterville JL, Koriwchak MJ, Winkle M, et al. Vocal fold paralysis following the anterior approach to the cervical spine. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996; 105:85-91.
10. Brislin BT, Hilibrand AS. Avoidance of complications in anterior cervical revision surgery. Curr Opin Orthop 2001; 12:257-264.
11. Curylo LJ, Mason HC, Bohlman HH. Tortuous course of the vertebral artery and anterior cervical decompression: a cadaveric and clinical case study. Spine 2000; 25:2860-2864.
12. Pait TG, Killefer JA, Arnautovic KI. Surgical anatomy of the anterior cervical spine: the disc space, vertebral artery, and associated bony structures. Neurosurgery 1996; 39:769-776.
13. Golfinos JG, Dickman CA, Zabramski JM, et al. Repair of vertebral arery injury during anterior cervical decompression. Spine 1994; 19:2552-2556.
14. Taniura S, Watanebe T. A ruptured dissecting aneurysm of the anterior radiculomedullary artery caused by vertebral angiography. Neuroradiology 2000; 42:539-542.
15. Bergqvist CA, Goldberg HI, Thorarensen O, Bird SJ. Posterior cervical spinal cord infarction following vertebral artery dissection. Neurology 1997; 48:1112-1115.
16. Russell SM, Benjamin V. The anterior surgical approach to the cervical spine for intervertebral disc disease. Neurosurgery 2004; 54:1144-1149. This article provides an excellent and detailed review of the anatomy and technique of the anterior cervical approach. Particularly helpful was the authors' description of the bilayer nature of the PLL - a thick, stout anterior layer and a thin, membranous posterior layer.
17. Villavicencio AT, Dimitrov DF, McGirt MJ, Turner DA. Management of acute cervical spinal cord injury. Neurologist 2001; 7:287-294.
18. Gunnarsson T, Fehlings MG. Acute neurosurgical management of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. Curr Opin Neurol 2003; 16:717-723.
19. Dumont RJ, Verma S, Okonkwo DO, et al. Acute spinal cord injury, part II: contemporary pharmacotherapy. Clin Neuropharmacol 2001; 24:265-279.
20. Dutton RP. Anesthetic management of spinal cord injury: clinical practice and future initiatives, Int Anesthesiol Clin 2002; 40:103-120.
21. Lu J, Ashwell KWS, Waite P. Advances in secondary spinal cord injury: role of apoptosis. Spine 2000; 25:1859-1866.
22. Vale FL, Burns J, Jackson AB. Combined medical and surgical treatment after acute spinal cord injury: results of a prospective pilot study to assess the merits of aggressive medical resuscitation and blood pressure management. J Neurosurg 1997; 87:239-246.
23. Levi L, Wolf A, Belzberg H. Hemodynamic parameters in patients with acute cervical cord trauma: description, intervention and prediction of outcome. Neurosurgery 1993; 33:1007-1016.
24. Management of acute spinal cord injuries in an intensive care unit or other monitored setting. Neurosurgery 2002; 50(suppl 3):S51-S57.
25. Hilibrand AS, Schwartz DM, Sethuraman V, et al. Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86:1248-1253. Excellent clinical study demonstrating the superior efficacy of MEP neuromonitoring over SSEPs. The authors report a series of 427 patients treated with decompression for either spondylotic myelopathy or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Two patients developed postoperative neurologic deficits (0.47%). In one patient, SSEP signals remained normal throughout the case, and in the other, the SSEP change lagged the MEP change by 33 minutes. MEP was 100% sensitive and specific.
26. Geck MJ, Eismont FJ. Surgical options for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Orthop Clin North Am 2002; 33:329-348.
27. Cornefjord M, Alemany M, Lerud C. Posterior fixation of subaxial cervical spine fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 2004 e-publication. The authors present their experience with the Olerud cervical fixation system in patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated for cervical trauma. This article provides a good discussion about ankylosing spondylitis and its effect on cervical spine surgery. Specifically, long posterior constructs are needed. Nine percent of patients developed a new neurologic deficit following surgery.
28. Wu CT, Lee ST. Spinal epidural hematoma and ankylosing spondylitis: case report and review of the literature. J Trauma 1998; 44:558-561.
29. Broom MJ, Raycroft JF. Complications of fractures of the cervical spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Spine 1988; 13:763-766.
30. Deen HG, Birch BD, Wharen RE, Reimer R. Lateral mass screw-rod fixation of the cervical spine: a prospective clinical series with 1-year follow-up. Spine J 2003; 6:489-495.
31. Ludwig SC, Kowalski JM, Edwards CC 2nd, Heller JG. Cervical pedicle screws: comparative accuracy of two insertion techniques. Spine 2000; 25:2675-2681.
32. Smith CE, Pinchak AB, Sidhu TS, et al. Evaluation of tracheal intubation difficulty in patients with cervical spine immobilization: fiberoptic (WuScope) versus conventional laryngoscopy. Anesthesiology 1999; 91:1253-1259.
33. Fuchs G, Schwarz G, Baumgartner A, et al. Fiberoptic intubation in 327 neurosurgical patients with lesions of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 1999; 11:11-16.
34. Apfelbaum RI, Kriskovich MD, Haller JR. On the incidence, cause, and prevention of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsies during anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine 2000; 25:2906-2912.
35. Perez-Cruet MJ, Fessier RG, Perin NI. Review: complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery. Neurosurgery 2002; 51(suppl 2):S26-S36.
36. Wilson-Holden TJ, VaSickle D, Lenke LG. The benefits of neurogenic mixed evoked potentials for intra-operative spinal cord monitoring during correction of severe scoliosis: a case study. Spine 2002; 27:E-258-E-265.
37. Nuwer MR. Spinal cord monitoring with somatosensory techniques. J Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 15:183-193.
38. Carlson GD, Gorden CD, Nakazoma S, et al. Perfusion-limited recovery of evoked potential function after spinal cord injury. Spine 2000; 25:1218-1226.
39. Cronin AJ. Spinal cord monitoring. Curr Opin Orthop 2002; 13:188-192.
40. Padberg AM, Wilson-Holden TJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH. Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery: an accepted standard of care. Spine 1998; 23:1392-1400.
41. Minahan RE. Intraoperative neuromonitoring. Neurologist 2002; 8:209-226.
42. Tsirikos AI, Aderinto J, Tucker SK, Noordeen HH. Spinal cord monitoring using intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials for spinal trauma. J Spinal Disord 2004; 17:385-394. This clinical study provides support for increasing the SSEP threshold amplitude from 50% to 60%, because this improved specificity for detecting neurologic injury from 60% to 81%. Additionally, if signals return to within 20% of baseline by the end of the case, the patient's neurologic prognosis was good.
43. Jou IM, Chern TC, Chen TY, Tsai YC. Effects of desflurane on spinal somatosensory-evoked potentials and conductive spinal cord evoked potentials. Spine 2003; 28:1845-1850.
44. Jou IM. Effects of core body temperature on changes in spinal somatosensory-evoked potential in acute spinal cord compression injury. Spine 2000; 25:1878-1885.
45. Hays SR, Schwengel DA. Transient hypotension as a complication of monitoring transcervical motor evoked potentials. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:314-317.
46. Weiss DS. Spinal cord and nerve root monitoring during surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis. Clin Orthop 2001; 384:82-100.
47. Classman SD, Dimar JR, Puno RM. A prospective analysis of intraoperative electromyographic monitoring of pedicle screw placement with computed tomography scan confirmation. Spine 1998; 13:27-32.
48. Shi YB, Binette M, Martin WH, et al. Electrical stimulation for intraoperative evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement. Spine 2003; 28:595-601.
49. Papadopoulos SM, Seiden NR, Quint DJ, et al. Immediate spinal cord decompression for cervical spinal cord injury: feasibility and outcome. J Trauma 2002; 52:323-332.
50. Stevens RD, Bhardwaj A, Kirsch J, Mirski MA. Critical care and perioperative management in traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2003; 15:215-229.
51. Vauzelle C, Stagnara P, Jouvinroux P. Functional monitoring of spinal cord activity during spinal surgery. Clin Orthop 1973; 93:173-178.
52. Nuwer MR. Spinal cord monitoring with somatosensory techniques. J Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 15:183-193.
53. Giesler FH, Dorsey FC, Coleman WP. Recovery of motor function after spinal-cord injury - a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with GM-1 ganglioside. N Engl J Med 1991; 324:1829-1838.
54. Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Holford TR, et al. Administration of methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 hours or tirilazad mesylate for 48 hours in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury: results of the Third National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Randomized Controlled Trial. National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. JAMA 1997; 277:1597-1604.
55. Klemme WR, Burkhalter W, Polly DW Jr, et al. Reversible ischemic myelopathy during scoliosis surgery: a possible role for intravenous lidocaine. J Pediatr Orthop 1999; 19:763-765.
56. Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Collins WF, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury: results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. N Engl J Med 1990; 322:1405-1411.