The light-hyperresponsive high pigment-2dg mutation of tomato: Alterations in the fruit metabolome

New Phytologist

Volumn 166, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 427-438

  Bino, Raoul J ^a,b   De Vos, C H Ric ^a   Lieberman, Michal ^c   Hall, Robert D ^a   Bovy, Arnaud ^a   Jonker, Harry H ^a   Tikunov, Yury ^a   Lommen, Arjen ^a   Moco, Sofia ^a   Levin, Ilan ^c  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b CENTRE FOR BIOSYSTEMS GENOMICS   (Netherlands)

^c VOLCANI CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Flavonoids; High pigment; Isoprenoids; Light stress; Lycopene; Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato); Metabolomics

Indexed keywords

ASCORBIC ACID; PIGMENT; TERPENE;

ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; LIGHT; PIGMENT;

ARTICLE; BIOSYNTHESIS; FRUIT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; LIGHT; METABOLISM; MUTATION; RADIATION EXPOSURE; TOMATO;

ASCORBIC ACID; FRUIT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; LIGHT; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MUTATION; PIGMENTS, BIOLOGICAL; TERPENES;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 20244383169     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01362.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adams-Phillips L, Barry C, Giovannoni JJ. 2004. Signal transduction systems regulating fruit ripening. Trends in Plant Science 9: 331-338.
2. Baker LR, Tomes ML. 1964. Carotenoids and chlorophylls in two tomato mutants and their hybrids. Proceedings of the American Society of Horticultural Science 85: 507-513.
3. Baldwin EA, Scott JW, Shewmaker CK, Schuch W. 2000. Flavor trivia and tomato aroma: biochemistry and possible mechanisms for control of important aroma components. Horticultural Science 35: 1013-1022.
4. Barr J, White WS, Chen L, Bae H, Rodermel S. 2004. The GHOST terminal oxidase regulates developmental programming in tomato fruit. Plant, Cell & Environment 27: 840-852.
5. Benvenuto G, Formiggini F, Laflamme P, Malakhov M, Bowler C. 2002. The photomorphogenesis regulator DET1 binds the amino-terminal tail of histone H2B in a nucleosome context. Current Biology 12: 1529-1534.
6. Bino RJ, Hall RD, Fiehn O, Kopka J, Saito K, Draper J, Nikolau B, Mendes P, Roessner-Tunali U, Beale M, Trethewey RN, Lange BM, Wurtele ES, Sumner LW. 2004. Potential of metabolomics as a functional genomics tool. Trends Plant Science 9: 418-424.
7. Bovy A, de Vos CHR, Kemper M, Schijlen E, Pertejo MA, Muir S, Collins G, Robinson S, Verhoeyen M, Hughes S, Santos-Buelga C, van Tunen AJ. 2002. High-flavonol tomatoes resulting from heterologous expression of the maize transcription factor genes LC1 and C1. Plant Cell 14: 2509-2526.
8. Cookson PJ, Kiano JW, Shipton CA, Fraser PD, Romer S, Schuch W, Bramley PM, Pyke KA. 2003. Increases in cell elongation, plastid compartment size and phytoene synthase activity underlie the phenotype of the high pigment-1 mutant of tomato. Planta 217: 896-903.
9. Fernie AR. 2003. Metabolome characterization in plant system analysis. Functional Plant Biology 30: 111-120.
10. Fiehn O. 2002. Metabolomics - the link between genotypes and phenotypes. Plant Molecular Biology 48: 155-171.
11. Fraser PD, Pinto MES, Holloway DE, Bramley PM. 2000. Application of high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection to the metabolic profiling of plant isoprenoids. Plant Journal 24: 551-558.
12. Friedman M. 2002. Tomato glycoalkaloids: role in the plant and in the diet. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50: 5751-5780.
13. van Grondelle R. 1994. Energy transfer and trapping in photosynthesis. Biochimica Biophysica Acta 895: 63-79.
14. Hall R, Beale M, Fiehn O, Hardy N, Sumner LW, Bino RJ. 2002. Plant metabolomics: the missing link in functional genomics strategies. Plant Cell 14: 1437-1440.
15. Helsper JPFG, de Vos CHR, Maas FM, Jonker HH, van den Broeck HC, Jordi W, Pot CS, Keizer LCP, Schapendonk AHCM. 2003. Response of selected antioxidants and pigments in tissues of Rosa hybrida and Fuchsia hybrida to supplemental UV-A exposure. Physiologia Plantarum 117: 171-187.
16. Horton P, Ruban AV, Wentworth M. 2000. Allosteric regulation of the light-harvesting system of photosystem II. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences 355: 1361-1370.
17. Hu JP, Aguirre M, Peto C, Echer J, Chory J. 2002. A role for peroxisomes in photomorphogenesis and development of Arabidopsis. Science 297: 405-409.
18. Jones CM, Mes P, Myers JR. 2003. Characterization and inheritance of the Anthocyanin fruit (Aft) tomato. Journal of Heredity 94: 449-456.
19. Kerckhoffs LHJ, de Groot NAMA, van Tuinen A, Schreuder MEL, Nagatani A, Koornneef M, Kendrick RE. 1997. Physiological characterization of exaggerated-photoresponse mutants of tomato. Plant Physiology 150: 578-587.
20. Konsler TR. 1973. Three mutants appearing in 'Manapal' tomato. Horticultural Science 8: 331-333.
21. Kopka J, Fernie AR, Weckwerth W, Gibon Y, Stitt M. 2004. Metabolite profiling in plant biology: platforms and destinations. Genome Biology 5: 1-9.
22. Kramer CY. 1956. Extension of multiple range tests to group 447 means with unequal number of replications. Biometrics 12: 309-310.
23. Krumbein A, Peters P, Bruckner B. 2004. Flavour compounds and a quantitative descriptive analysis of tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) of different cultivars in short-term storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology 32: 15-28.
24. Levin I, Frankel P, Gilboa N, Tanny S, Lalazar A. 2003. The tomato dark green mutation is a novel allele of the tomato homolog of the DEETIOLATED1 gene. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 454-460.
25. Levin I, Lalazar A, Bar M, Schaffer AA. 2004. Non-GMO fruit factories: strategies for modulating metabolic pathways in the tomato fruit. Industrial Crops and Products 20: 29-36.
26. Lieberman M, Segev O, Gilboa N, Lalazar A, Levin I. 2004. The tomato homolog of the gene encoding UV DAMAGED DNA BINDING protein 1 (DDB1) underlined as the gene that causes the high pigment-1 mutant phenotype. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 1574-1581.
27. Liu YS, Gur A, Ronen G, Causse M, Damidaux R, Buret M, Hirschberg J, Zamir D. 2003. There is more to tomato fruit color than candidate carotenoid genes. Plant Biotechnology Journal 1: 195-207.
28. Liu YS, Roof S, Ye ZB, Barry C, van Tuinen A, Vrebalov J, Bowler C, Giovannoni J. 2004. Manipulation of light signal transduction as a means of modifying fruit nutritional quality in tomato. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 9897-9902.
29. Miller EC, Hadley CW, Schwartz SJ, Erdman JW, Boileau TWM, Clinton SK. 2002. Lycopene, tomato products, and prostate cancer prevention. Have we established causality? Pure and Applied Chemistry 74: 1435-1441.
30. Mochizuki T, Kamimura S. 1984. Inheritance of vitamin C content and its relation to other characters in crosses between hp and og varieties of tomatoes. In: 9th Meeting of the EUCARPIA Tomato Workshop. Wageningen, the Netherlands: EUCARPIA Tomato Working Group, 8-13.
31. Muir S, Collins GJ, Robinson S, Hughes S, Bovy A, de Vos CHR, van Tunen AJ, Verhoeyen ME. 2001. Overexpression of petunia chalcone isomerase in tomato results in fruit containing increased levels of flavonols. Nature Biotechnology 19: 470-474.
32. Mustilli AC, Fenzi F, Ciliento R, Alfano F, Bowler C. 1999. Phenotype of the tomato high pigment-2 mutant is caused by a mutation in the tomato homolog of DEETIOLATED1. Plant Cell 14: 145-157.
33. Peters JL, van Tuinen A, Adamse P, Kendrick RE, Koornneef M. 1989. High pigment mutants of tomato exhibit high sensitivity for phytochrome action. Plant Physiology 134: 661-666.
34. Peters JL, Schreuder MEL, Verduin SJW, Kendrick RE. 1992. Physiological characterization of a high pigment mutation of tomato. Photochemistry and Photobiology 56: 75-82.
35. Robert B, Horton P, Pascal AA, Ruban AV. 2004. Insights into the molecular dynamics of plant light-harvesting proteins in vivo. Trends in Plant Science 9: 385-390.
36. von Roepenack-Lahaye E, Degenkol T, Zerjeski M, Franz M, Roth U, Wessjohann L, Schmidt J, Scheel D, Clemens S. 2004. Profiling of Arabidopsis secondary metabolites by capillary liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Plant Physiology 134: 548-559.
37. Ruban AV, Lee PJ, Wentworth M, Young AJ, Horton P. 1999. Determination of the stoichiometry and strength of binding of xanthophylls to the photosystem II light harvesting complexes. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274: 10458-10465.
38. Schroeder DF, Gahrtz M, Maxwell BB, Cook RK, Kan JM, Alonso JM, Ecker JR, Chory J. 2002. De-Etiolated 1 and Damaged DNA Binding Protein 1 interact to regulate Arabidopsis photomorphogenesis. Current Biology 12: 1462-1472.
39. Soressi GP. 1975. New spontaneous or chemically-induced fruit-ripening tomato mutants. Tomato Genetics Cooperative Report 25: 21-22.
40. Stevens MA, Rick CM. 1986. Genetics and Breeding. New York, USA: Chapman & Hall.
41. Tolstikov W, Lommen A, Nakanishi K, Tanaka N, Fiehn O. 2003. Monolithic silica-based capillary reversed-phase liquid chromatography/electrospray mass spectrometry for plant metabolomics. Analytical Chemistry 75: 6737-6740.
42. van Tuinen A, de Vos CHR, Hall RD, van der Plas LHW, Bowler C, Bino RJ. 2005. Use of metabolomics for development of tomato mutants with enhanced nutritional value by exploiting natural non-GMO light-hyperresponsive mutants. In: Jaiwal P, ed. Plant Genetic Engineering: Improvement of the Nutritional and the Therapeutic Qualities of Plants. Shrub Oak, NY, USA: Agritech Publications/Agricell Report. (In press.)
43. Verhoeven HA, Beuerle T, Schwab W. 1997. Solid-phase microextraction: artifact formation and its avoidance. Chromatographia 46: 63-66.
44. Wagner C, Sefkow M, Kopka J. 2003. Construction and application of a mass spectral and retention time index database generated from plant GC/El-TOF-MS metabolite profiles. Phytochemistry 62: 887-900.
45. Wann EV. 1997. Tomato germplasm lines T4065, T4099, T5019 and T5020 with unique genotypes that enhance fruit quality. Horticultural Science 32: 747-748.
46. c on tomato fruit quality. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 110: 212-215.
47. Wertz IE, O'Rourke KM, Zhang Z, Dornan D, Arnott D, Deshaies RJ, Dixit VM. 2004. Human de-etiolated-1 regulates c-Jun by assembling a CUL4A ubiquitin ligase. Science 27: 1371-1374.
48. Willcox JK, Catignani GL, Lazarus S. 2003. Tomatoes and cardiovascular health. Critical Review of Food Science and Nutrition 43: 1-18.
49. Wittschieben BO, Wood RD. 2003. DDB complexities. DNA Repair 2: 1065-1069.
50. Wolff JC, Eckers C, Sage AB, Giles K, Bateman R. 2001. Accurate mass liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry on quadrupole orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight mass analyzers using switching between separate sample and reference sprays. 2. Applications using the dual-electrospray ion source. Analytical Chemistry 73: 2605-2612.
51. Yahagawa Y, Sullivan JA, Komatsu S, Gusmaroli G, Suzuki G, Yin J, Ishibashi T, Saijo Y, Rubio V, Kimura S, Wang J, Deng XW. 2004. Arabidopsis COP10 forms a complex with DDB1 and DET1 in vivo and enhances the activity of ubiquitin conjugating enzymes. Genes and Development 18: 2172-2181.
52. Yen HC, Shelton BA, Howard LR, Lee S, Vrebalov J, Giovannoni JJ. 1997. The tomato high-pigment (hp) locus maps to chromosome 2 and influences plastome copy number and fruit quality. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95: 1069-1079.