Lex Americana? A response to Levi-Faur

International Organization

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 463-472

  Kelemen, R Daniel ^a   Sibbitt, Eric C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 20044376710     PISSN: 00208183     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0020818305050174     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Ajani, Gianmaria. 1995. By Chance and Prestige: Legal Transplants in Russia and Eastern Europe. American Journal of Comparative Law 43 (1):93-117.
2. Coppedge, Michael. 1999. Thickening Thin Concepts and Theories: Combining Large N and Small in Comparative Politics. Comparative Politics 31 (4):465-76.
3. DeLisle, Jacques. 1999. Lex Americana?. United States Legal Assistance, American Legal Models and Legal Change in the Post-Communist World and Beyond. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law. 20 (2):179-308.
4. Dezalay, Yves, and Bryant Garth. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Epp, Charles. 2003. The Judge over Your Shoulder: Is Adversarial Legalism Exceptionally American? Law and Social Inquiry 28 (3):743-70.
6. Eyestone, Robert. 1977. Confusion, Diffusion and Innovation. American Political Science Review 71 (2):441-53.
7. Ewald, William. 1995. Comparative Jurisprudence (II): The Logic of Legal Transplants. The American Journal of Comparative Law 43 (4):489-510.
8. Ferejohn, John. 2002a. Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law. Law and Contemporary Problems 65 (3):41-68.
9. _. 2002b. Constitutional Review in the Global Context. New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy 6:49-59.
10. Ferejohn, John, and Pasquale Pasquino. 2004. Constitutional Adjudication: Lessons from Europe. Texas Law Review 82 (7):1671-704.
11. Friedman Goldstein, Leslie. 2004. From Democracy to Juristocracy. Law and Society Review. 38 (3):611-29.
12. Ginsburg, Tom. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Michael D. Ward. 2003. Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization. Paper presented at the Weatherhead Center of International Affairs Conference on International Diffusion of Political and Economic Liberalization, October 3-4, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. Available at: 〈http://www.wcfia.harvard.edu/conferences/ internationaldiffusion/Papers%20Revised/DiffusionGleditsch%20.pdf〉. Accessed 28 January 2004.
14. Guarnieri, Carlo, and Patrizia Pederzoli. 2002. The Power of Judges: A Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Hirschl, Ran. 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
16. Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
17. Kagan, Robert. 1997. Should Europe Worry about Adversarial Legalism? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 17 (2): 165-84.
18. _. 2001. Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
19. Keck, Margaret, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
20. Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Eric C. Sibbitt. 2004. The Globalization of American Law. International Organization 58 (1):103-36.
21. Langer, Maximo. 2004. From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Procedure. Harvard International Law Journal 45 (1):1-64.
22. Lester, Anthony. 1988. The Overseas Trade in the American Bill of Rights. Columbia Law Review 88 (3):537-61.
23. Lubman, Stanley. 1999. Bird in a Cage: Legal Reform in China After Mao. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
24. Mattei, Ugo. 1994. Why the Wind Changed: Intellectual Leadership in Western Law. American Journal of Comparative Law 42 (1):195-218.
25. Peerenboom, Randall. 2001. Globalization, Path Dependency and the Limits of Law: Administrative Law Reform and the Rule of Law in the People's Republic of China. Berkeley Journal of International Law 19 (2):61-264.
26. Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1995. Controlling Environmental Policy: The Limits of Public Law in Germany and the United States. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
27. Sarat, Austin, and Stuart Scheingold, eds. 2001. Cause Lawyering and the State in the Global Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. Concept Misinformation in Comparative Politics. American Political Science Review 64 (4):1033-53.
29. Shaffer, Gregory C. 2003. Defending Interests: Public-Private Partnerships in WTO Litigation. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
30. Shapiro, Martin. 1981. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. _. 1993. The Globalization of Law. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 1 (1):37-64.
32. _. 1998. Globalization of the Freedom of Contract. In The State and the Freedom of Contract, edited by Harry Scheiber, 269-300. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
33. Shapiro, Martin, and Alec Stone. 1994. Introduction: The New Constitutional Politics. Comparative Political Studies 26 (4):397-420.
34. Simmons, Beth, and Zachary Elkins. 2004. The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy. American Political Science Review 98 (1):171-89.
35. Simmons, Beth, Frank Dobbin, and Geoffrey Garrett. 2004. The International Diffusion of Liberalism. Unpublished manuscript, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University. Available at: 〈http://www.wcfia.harvard.edu/conferences/internationaldiffusion/ Papers%20Revised/Introduction.pdf〉. Accessed 9 November 2004.
36. Slaughter, Anne Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
37. Stone Sweet, Alec. 2000. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Tate, C. Neal, and Torbjörn Vallinder, eds. 1995. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press.
39. Teubner, Gunther. 2001. Legal Irritants: How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergencies. In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, edited by Peter Hall and David Soskice, 417-41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
41. Watson, Alan. 1978. Comparative Law and Legal Change. Cambridge Law Journal 37 (2):313-36.
42. _. 1993. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. 2d ed. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
43. Wiegand, Wolfgang. 1991. The Reception of American Law in Europe. The American Journal of Comparative Law 39 (2):229-48.