Evaluation of internal adaptation in ceramic and composite resin inlays by silicon replica technique

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 448-453

  Karakaya, S ^a   Sengun, A ^a   Ozer F ^a  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Inlay; Internal adaptation; Silicon replica technique

Indexed keywords

RESIN; SILICON; SILOXANE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; DATA ANALYSIS; GINGIVA; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL LEAKAGE; HUMANS; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); REPLICA TECHNIQUES;

EID: 20044372010     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01443.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Puy MCL, Navarro LF, Llacer LJF, Ferrandez A. Composite resin inlays: A study of marginal adaptation. Quintessence Int. 1993;24:429-433.
2. Robinson PB, Moore BK, Swartz ML. Comparison of microleakage in direct and indirect composite resin restorations in vitro. Oper Dent. 1987;12:113-116.
3. Peutzfeld A, Asmussen E. A comparsion of accuracy in seating and gap formation for three inlay/onlay techniques. Oper Dent. 1990;15:129-135.
4. Kreulen CM, VanAmerongen WE, Gruythuysen RJM, et al. Prevalence of postoperative sensitivity with indirect class II resin composite inlayss. J Dent Child. 1993;60:95-98.
5. Reid JS, Saunders WP, Baidas KM. Marginal fit and microleakage of indirect inlay systems. Am J Dent. 1993;6:81-84.
6. Hasanreisoglu U, Sonmez H, Uctasli S, Wilson HJ. Microleakage of direct and indirect inlay/onlay systems. J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23:66-71.
7. Wassell RW, Wals AWG, Mc Cabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5 year follw up. J Dent. 2000;28:375-382.
8. Shortal AC, Baylis RL, Baylis MA, Grundy JR. Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays. Int J Prosth. 1989;2:217-223.
9. Crispin BJ, Hewlett ER, Jo YH, Hobo S, Hornbrook DS. Contemporary Esthetic Dentistry: Practice Fundamentals. Chicago (IL) Quintessence Publishing Co, Ltd; 1994; p. 205-240.
10. Iada K, Inokoshi S, Kurosaki N. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites. Oper Dent. 2003;28:445-452.
11. Qualtrough AJE, Piddock V, Kypreou V. A comparison of two in vitro methods for assessing the fitting accuracy of composite inlays. Br Dent J. 1993;174:450-454.
12. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: Direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. Oper Dent. 1999;24:147-155.
13. Addi S, Hedayati-Khams A, Poya A, Sjogren G. Interface gap size of manually and CAD/CAM-manufactured ceramic inlays/onlays in vitro. J Dent. 2002;30:53-58.
14. Gemalmaz D, Sertgoz A, Ozcan M, Yoruc AB, Alkumru HN. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of marginal integrity in ceramic inlays. J Marmara Univ Dent Fac. 1996;2:465-469.
15. Schmalz G, Federlin M, Reich E. Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a class II ceramic inlay. J Prosth Dent. 1995;73:392-399.
16. Dietschi D, Maeder M, Holz J. In vitro evaluation of marginal fit and morphology of fired ceramec inlays. Quintessence Int. 1992;23:271-278.
17. Sorensen JA. Improved seating of ceramic inlays with a silicone fit-checking medium. J Prosth Dent. 1991;65:646-649.
18. Mclean JW, Von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971;131:107-111.
19. Campagni WV. The final touch in the delivery of a fixed prosthesis. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1984;12:21-29.
20. Freijlich S, Dirckx JJJ, Swartz M, Andres CJ. Moiré topography for measuring the dimensional accuracy of resin complete denture bases. Int J Prosth. 1989;2:272-279.
21. Qvist J. Resin-bonded enamel-dentin inlays. J Dent Res. 1989;68:977(Abstr 881).
22. Karakaya S, Ozer F. The comparison of marginal adaptation values of amalgam, porcelain and composite inlays. J Selcuk Univ Dent Fac. 2002;12:1-5.
23. Karakaya S, Ozer F. The comparison of microleakage values of amalgam, porcelain, and composite inlays. J Selcuk Univ Dent Fac. 1999;9:74-78.
24. Dietschi D, Moor L. Evaluation of the marginal and internal adaptation of different ceramic and composite inlay systems after an in vitro fatigue test. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1:41-56.