Comparative informativeness for linkage of multiple SNPs and single microsatellites

Human Heredity

Volumn 58, Issue 3-4, 2004, Pages 164-170

  Lindholm, Eva ^a   Hodge, Susan E ^a,b   Greenberg, David A ^a,b  

^a Mailman School of Public Health   (United States)

^b NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Linkage analysis; Microsatellite markers; Multipoint linkage SNPs

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALLELE; CALCULATION; CHILD; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAMILY HISTORY; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; HAPLOTYPE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LINKAGE ANALYSIS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; PARENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SIBLING; SIMULATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALLELES; FAMILY HEALTH; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; HAPLOTYPES; HETEROZYGOTE; HUMANS; LINKAGE (GENETICS); LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; LOD SCORE; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; STATISTICS;

EID: 19944392560     PISSN: 00015652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000083543     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Hodge SE, Boehnke M, Spence MA: Loss of information due to ambiguous haplotyping of SNPs. Nat Genet 1999;21:360-361.
2. Lindholm E, Zhang J, Hodge SE, Greenberg DA: The reliability of haplotyping inference in nuclear families: Misassignment rates of SNPs and microsatellites. Hum Hered 2004;57:117-127.
3. Kruglyak L, Daly MJ, Reeve-Daly MP, Lander El: Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: A unified multipoint approach. Am J Hum Genet 1996;58:1346-1363.
4. Sobel E, Lange K: Descent graphs in pedigree analysis: Applications to haplotyping, location scores, and marker sharing statistics. Am J Hum Genet 1997;58:1323-1337.
5. Kruglyak L: The use of a genetic map of biallelic markers in linkage studies. Nat Genet 1997;17:21-24.
6. Wilson AF, Sorant AJ: Equivalence of single-and multilocus markers: power to detect linkage with composite markers derived from biallelic loci. Am J Hum Genet 2000;66:1610-1615.
7. John S, Shephard N, Liu G, Zeggini E, Cao M, Chen W, Vasavda N, Mills T, Barton A, Hinks A, Eyre S, Jones KW, Oilier W, Silman A, Gibson N, Worthington J, Kennedy GC: Whole-genome scan, in a complex disease, using 11,245 single-nucleotide polymorphisms: Comparison with microsatellites. Am J Hum Genet 2004;75:54-64.
8. Evans DM, Cardon LR: Guidelines for genotyping in genomewise linkage studies: Single-nucleotide-polymorphism maps versus microstatellite maps. Am J Hum Genet 2004;75:687-692.
9. Greenberg DA, MacCluer JW, Spence MA, Falk CT, Hodge SE: Simulated data for a complex genetic trait (Problem 2 for GAW 11): How the model was developed, and why; in Goldin L, Amos CI, Chase GA, Goldstein AM, Jarvik GP, Martinez MM, Suarez BK, Weeks DE, Wijsman EM, MacCluer JW (eds): Genetic Analysis Workshop 11: Analysis of Genetic and Environmental Factors in Common Diseases. Genet Epidemiol 1999;17:S449-S459.
10. Thompson MW, McInnes RR, Willard HF: Thompson & Thompson, Genetics in Medicine, ed 5. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1991, pp 474-475.
11. Hodge SE: Exact ELODA and exact power for affected sib pairs analyzed for linkage under simple right and wrong models. Am J Med Genet (Neuropsychiatr Genet) 1998;81:66-72.
12. Ott J: Analysis of Human Genetic Linkage, ed 3. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins, 1999, Ch 5.
13. Gordon D, Heath SC, Ott J: True pedigree errors more frequent than apparent errors for single nucleotide polymorphisms. Hum Hered 1999;49:65-70.
14. Terwilliger JD, Göring HHH: Gene mapping in the 20th and 21st centuries: Statistical methods, data analysis, and experimental design. Hum Biol 2000;72:63-132.