Pseudogap and spin fluctuations in the normal state of the electron-doped cuprates

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 93, Issue 14, 2004, Pages

  Kyung, B ^a   Hankevych, V ^a,b   Dare A M ^c   Tremblay, A M S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^b TERNOPIL IVAN PULUJ NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Ukraine)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIFERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; CORRELATION METHODS; DOPING (ADDITIVES); ELECTRONS; HIGH TEMPERATURE EFFECTS; NEUTRON SCATTERING; PHOTOEMISSION; SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSIS;

ANGLE-RESOLVED PHOTOEMISSION SPECTROSCOPY (ARPES); ELECTRON-DOPED CUPRATES; HUBBARD MODEL; PLANAR LATTICE;

OXIDE SUPERCONDUCTORS;

EID: 19644401259     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.147004     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. A. Damascelli et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 473 (2003).
2. C. Kusko et al., Phys. Rev. B 66, 140513 (2002).
3. B. Kyung et al., Phys. Rev. B 68, 174502 (2003).
4. R. S. Markiewicz, cond-mat/0312594 [Phys. Rev. B (to be published)].
5. D. Sénéchal et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 126401 (2004).
6. N. P. Armitage et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 147003 (2001).
7. N. P. Armitage et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 257001 (2002).
8. P. K. Mang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 027002 (2004).
9. M. Matsuda et al., Phys. Rev. B 45, 12548 (1992).
10. T. Tohyama et al., Phys. Rev. B 64, 212505 (2001).
11. H. Kusunose et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 186407 (2003).
12. G. Blumberg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 107002 (2002).
13. Y. Onose et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 217001 (2001).
14. Y. Dagan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 167001 (2004).
15. Y. M. Vilk et al., Phys. Rev. B 49, 13267 (1994).
16. Y. M. Vilk et al., J. Phys. I (France) 7, 1309 (1997).
17. S. Moukouri et al., Phys. Rev. B 61, 7887 (2000).
18. S. Allen et al., in Theoretical Methods for Strongly Correlated Electrons, edited by D. Sénéchal et al. (Springer, New York, 2003).
19. A. F. Veilleux et al., Phys. Rev. B 52, 16255 (1995).
20. B. Kyung et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 099702 (2003).
21. We do not claim three digit accuracy in our choice of parameters. We generally tried several values separated by 0.025t. The two sets of band parameters quoted correspond to local "best choices."
22. C. Kim et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4245 (1998).
23. A. Kaminski et al., Phys. Rev. B 69, 212509 (2004).
24. Spectral peaks at ω = 0 near (0, π) become sharper in qualitative agreement with recent experiments by Y. Onose et al. Phys. Rev. B 69, 024504 (2004).
25. One would need an unrealistic 20% change in hopping t to keep U identical at n = 1.1 and n = 1.15.
26. S. Uchida et al., Physica (Amsterdam) 162C, 1677 (1989).
27. Y. M. Vilk, Phys. Rev. B 55, 3870 (1997).
28. When this occurs, additional superconducting precursor effects may contribute to the pseudogap.
29. V. Hankevych et al., cond-mat/0407085.
30. Y. M. Vilk et al., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 56, 1769 (1995); Europhys. Lett. 33, 159 (1996).
31. Y. M. Vilk et al., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 56, 1769 (1995); Europhys. Lett. 33, 159 (1996).