Many-body theory versus simulations for the pseudogap in the Hubbard model

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 61, Issue 12, 2000, Pages 7887-7892

  Moukouri, S ^a   Allen, S ^a   Lemay, F ^a   Kyung, B ^a   Poulin, D ^a   Vilk, Y ^a   Tremblay, A M S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001332909     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.7887     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. J. E. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. B 31, 4403 (1985).
2. S. R. White, D. J. Scalapino, R. L. Sugar, E. Y. Loh, Jr., J. E. Gubernatis, and R. T. Scalettar, Phys. Rev. B 40, 506 (1989).
3. N. E. Bickers and D. J. Scalapino, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 193, 206 (1989).
4. N. E. Bickers, D. J. Scalapino, and S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 961 (1989).
5. J. J. Deisz, D. W. Hess, and J. W. Serene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1312 (1996).
6. Y. M. Vilk, Liang Chen, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Phys. Rev. B 49, 13 267 (1994).
7. Y. M. Vilk and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Europhys. Lett. 33, 159 (1996).
8. Y. M. Vilk and A.-M. S. Tremblay, J. Phys. I 7, 1309 (1997).
9. S. Allen, H. Touchette, S. Moukouri, Y. M. Vilk, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4128 (1999).
10. M. Vekic and S. R. White, Phys. Rev. B 47, 1160 (1993).
11. C. E. Creffield, E. G. Klepfish, E. R. Pike, and Sarben Sarkar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 517 (1995).
12. M. Jarrell and J. E. Gubernatis, Phys. Rep. 269, 133 (1996).
13. R. K. Bryan, Eur. Biophys. J. 18, 165 (1990).
14. N. Bulut, D. J. Scalapino, and S. R. White, Phys. Rev. B 47, 2742 (1993).
15. N. F. Berk and J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 433 (1966).
16. Gordon Baym, Phys. Rev. 127, 1391 (1962).
17. S. Marcelja, Phys. Rev. B 1, 2351 (1970).
18. S. Allen, B. Kyung, and A.-M. S. Tremblay (unpublished).
19. Y. M. Vilk, S. Allen, H. Touchette, S. Moukouri, L. Chen, and A.-M.S. Tremblay, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 59, 1873 (1998).
20. The spin-density-wave ground-state gap in (Formula presented) is often refered to as a charge gap. It is a single-particle excitation gap. The spectral weight for the spin-spin correlation function has no gap because of the Goldstone modes. The spectral weight for the charge-charge correlation function is more complicated. When the spin order is collinear, there is a gap to charge excitations, but when the order is spiral there can be no gap in the charge excitations (even though the system is an insulator for dc current and there is a gap to single-particle excitations). In fact, in this case, for any wave vector other than zero the collective modes are a mixture of spin and charge excitations. See R. Côté and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Europhys. Lett. 29, 37 (1995).
21. Antoine Georges, Gabriel Kotliar, Werner Krauth, and Marcelo J. Rozenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996).
22. Stéphane Pairault, David Sénéchal, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5389 (1998).
23. C. Huscroft, M. Jarrell, Th. Maier, S. Moukouri, A. N. Tahvildarzadeh, cond-mat/9910226 (unpublished). This work confirms our contention since by adding the effect of finite dimension through a cluster approach to dynamical mean-field theory, a pseudogap appears.
24. G. Preosti, Y. M. Vilk, and M. R. Norman, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1474 (1999).
25. D. Poulin (unpublished).
26. J. Corson, R. Mallozzi, J. Orenstein, J. N. Eckstein, and I. Bozovic, Nature (London) 398, 221 (1999).
27. J. CorsonR. MallozziJ. OrensteinJ. N. EcksteinI. Bozoviccond-mat/9908368(unpublished).
28. A. V. Fedorov, T. Valla, P. D. Johnson, Q. Li, G. D. Gu, and N. Koshizuka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2179 (1999).