Non-perturbative many-body approach to the hubbard model and single-particle pseudogap

Journal de Physique II

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 1997, Pages 1309-1368

  Vilk, Y M ^a   Tremblay, A M S ^b  

^a ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIFERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; BAND STRUCTURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENERGY GAP; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; FERMI LEVEL; MAGNETIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PHASE DIAGRAMS; PHASE TRANSITIONS;

ELECTRON GAS; FERMI GAS; HUBBARD MODEL; LATTICE FERMION MODELS; MERMIN WAGNER THEOREM; NONPERTURBATIVE MANY BODY METHODS; PAULI PRINCIPLE; SINGLE PARTICLE PSEUDOGAP;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0031275979     PISSN: 11554312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (133)

1. Hubbard J., Proc. Roy. Soc. A276 (1963) 238;
2. Gutzwiller M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 10 (1963) 159.
3. Kanamori J., Prog. Theor. Phys. 30 (1963) 275.
4. For a recent arid complete review of electrons interacting in one-dimension see Voit J., Rep. Prog. Phys. 58 (1995) 977.
5. Haldane F.D.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 (1980) 1358;
6. J. Phys. C14 (1981) 2585;
7. Phys. Lett. 81A (1981) 153;
8. Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 (1981) 1840.
9. Dzyaloshinski I.E. and Larkin A.I., Sov. Phys. JETP 38 (1974) 202.
10. Emery V.J., in Highly Conducting One-Dimensional Solids, J.T. Devreese, R.P. Evrard and V.E. van Doren, Eds. (Plenum 1979) p. 247.
11. Bourbonnais C. and Caron L.G., Physica B143 (1986) 451;
12. Europhys. Lett. 5 (1988) 209;
13. C.Bourbonnais C., Ph.D thesis, Université de Sherbrooke (1985) unpublished.
14. For reviews, see Solyom J., Adv. Phys. 28 (1979) 201;
15. Voit J., Rep. Prog. Phys. 58 (1995) 977; and [47].
16. Frahm H. and Korepin V.E., Phys. Rev. B 42 (1990) 10553;
17. Frahm H. and Korepin V.E., Phys. Rev. B 43 (1991) 5653.
18. For an introduction to conformai methods, see Conformai Field Theory, P. DiFrancesco, P. Mathieu and D. Sénéchal, Eds. (Springer Verlag, New York, 1996).
19. Georges A., Kotliar G., Krauth W. and Rozenberg M.J., Rev. Mod. Phys. 68 (1996) 13.
20. For reviews of slave-boson approaches applied to the Hubbard model, see for example, Kotliar G., in Correlated Electrons Systems, Jerusalem Winter School for Theoretical Physics, Vol. 9, V.J. Emery, Ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993) p. 118
21. c Superconductivity, Les Houches, Session LVI, 1991, B. Douçot and J. Zinn-Justin, Eds. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995) p. 197.
22. Yoshioka D., J. Phys. Soc. Japan 58 (1989) 32;
23. J. Phys. Soc. Japan ibid. (1989) 1516;
24. Jayaprakash C., Krishnamurthy H.R. and Barker S., Phys. Rev. B 40 (1989) 2610.
25. Bickers N.B., Rev. Mod. Phys. 59 (1987) 845.
26. Boies D., Jackson F. and Tremblay A.-M.S., Int. J. Mod. Phys. 9 (1995) 1001.
27. Boies D., Bourbonnais C. and Tremblay A.-M.S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 968.
28. Dagotto E., Rev. Mod. Phys. 66 (1994) 763.
29. Chakravarty S., Halperin B.I. and Nelson D.R., Phys. Rev. B 39 (1989) 2344.
30. Sachdev S., Chubukov A.V. and Sokol A., Phys. Rev. B 51 (1995) 14874.
31. Chubukov A.V., Sachdev S. and Ye J., Phys. Rev. B 49 (1994) 11919.
32. Hertz J.A., Phys. Rev. B 14 (1976) 1165.
33. Millis A.J., Phys. Rev. B 48 (1993) 7183.
34. For a review, see Moriya T., Spin Fluctuations in Itinerant Electron Magnetism (Springer-Verlag, 1985).
35. Bickers N.B. and Scalapino D.J., Annals of Physics 193 (1989) 206.
36. Bickers N.B., Int. J. of Mod. Phys. B 5 (1991) 253.
37. Baym G., Phys. Rev. B 127 (1962) 1391.
38. Kadanoff L.P. and Baym G., Quantum Statistical Mechanics (Benjamin, Menlo Park, 1962).
39. Luttinger J.M. and Ward J.C., Phys. Rev. 118 (1960) 1417;
40. Luttinger J.M., Phys. Rev. 119 (1960) 1153.
41. Vilk Y.M., Chen L. and Tremblay A.-M.S., Phys. Rev. B 49 (1994) 13267;
42. Vilk Y.M., Chen L. and Tremblay A.-M.S., Physica C 235-240 (1994) 2235.
43. Vilk Y.M. and Tremblay A.-M.S., Europhys. Lett. 33 (1996) 159;
44. Vilk Y.M. and Tremblay A.-M.S., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 56 (1995) 1769.
45. For a review, see Singwi K.S. and Tosi M.P., in Solid State Physics, H. Ehrenreich, F. Seitz and D. Turnbull, Eds. (Academic, New York, 1981) p. 177;
46. Ichimaru S., Rev. Mod. Phys. 54 (1982) 1017.
47. For a review of paragnon theories, see Enz O.P., A Course on Many-Body Theory Applied to Solid-State Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992).
48. Dare A.-M., Vilk Y.M. and Tremblay A.-M.S., Phys. Rev. B 53 (1996) 14236.
49. Veilleux A., Dare A.-M., Chen L., Vilk Y.M. and Tremblay A.-M.S., Phys. Rev. B 52 (1995) 16255.
50. Kampf A.P. and Schrieffer J.R., Phys. Rev. B 41 (1990) 6399;
51. Phys. Rev. B 42 (1990) 7967.
52. Vilk Y.M., Phys. Rev. B 55 (1997) 3870.
53. Langer M., Schmalian J., Grabowski S. and Bennemann K.H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 4508.
54. Deisz J.J., Hess D.W. and Serene J.W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996) 1312.
55. Marshall D.S. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996) 4841;
56. Loeser A.G. et al., Science 273 (1996) 325.
57. Ding H. et al., Nature 382 (1996) 51.
58. Chubukov A.V., Phys. Rev. B 52 (1995) R3847.
59. Martin P.C. and Schwinger J., Phys. Rev. 115 (1959) 1342.
60. +). Note that at equilibrium, this initial guess for the self-energy has a Hartree-Fock from but with U replaced by f/ch, clearly only a low-frequency approximation to the self-energy.
61. Chen L., Bourbonnais C., Li T. and Tremblay A.-M.S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 369.
62. Dare A.-M., Chen L. and Tremblay A.-M.S., Phys. Rev. B 49 (1994) 4106.
63. Stamp P.C.E., J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 15 (1985) 1829.
64. Bourbonnais C. and Caron L.G., Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 5 (1991) 1033;
65. Bourbonnais C. and Caron L.G., Europhys. Lett. 5 (1988) 209;
66. Physica B 143 (1986) 451;
67. c Superconductivity, Les Houches, Session LVI, 1991, B. Douçot and J. Zinn-Justin, Eds. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995) p. 307.
68. Independent estimates of the size of contact vertex corrections by Sharifzadeh Amin M.H. ' and Stamp P.C.E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3017 give the same order of magnitude as those we find.
69. Menge B. and Müller-Hartmann E., Z. Phys. B. Cond. Matt. 82 (1991) 237.
70. Macedo C.A. and Coutino-Filho M.D., Phys. Rev. B 43 (1991) 13515.
71. Hotta T. and Fujimoto S., Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) 5381, have checked within perturbation theory that this decrease of charge fluctuations as one approaches half-filling at fixed temperature can indeed be explained only if vertex corrections are included.
72. Bulut N., Scalapino D.J and White S.R., Phys. Rev. B 47 (1993) 2742.
73. Bickers N.B. and White S.R., Phys. Rev. B 43 (1991) 8044.
74. Galân J., Vergés J.A. and Martin-Rodero A., Phys. Rev. B 48 (1993) 13654.
75. White S.R., Phys. Rev. B 46 (1992) 5679;
76. M. Vekic and White S.R., Phys. Rev. B 46 (1992) 5679;
77. Vekic M. and White S.R., Phys. Rev. B 47 (1993) 1160.
78. White S.R., Scalapino D.J., Sugar R.L., Loh Jr. E.Y., Gubernatis J.E. and Scalettar R.T., Phys. Rev. B 40 (1989) 506.
79. Moreo A., Scalapino D.J., Sugar R.L., White S.R. and Bickers N.B., Phys. Rev. B 41 (1990) 2313.
80. A similar analysis of Monte Carlo data has been used earlier for the negative U Hubbard model by Randeria M., Trivedi N., Moreo A. and Scalettar R.T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 2001.
81. Tasaki H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1996) 4678.
82. Müller-Hartmann E., Int. J. Mod. Phys. 12 (1989) 2169.
83. Amadon J.C. and Hirsch J.E., Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) 6364.
84. Frésard R. and Wölfle R, J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. 4 (1992) 3625;
85. Möller B., Doll K. and Fresard R., J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. 5 (1993) 4847.
86. For the phase diagram predicted by the Gutzwiller variational approach, see Dzierzawa M. and Frésard R., Z. Phys. B: Cond. Matt. 91 (1993) 245.
87. Freericks K. and Jarrell M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 186;
88. Tahvildar-Zadeh A.N., Freericks J.K. and Jarrell M., Phys. Rev. B 55 (1997) 942.
89. Furukawa N. and Imada M., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 61 (1992) 3331.
90. Creffield C.E., Klepfish E.G., Pike E.R. and Sarkar S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 517.
91. Chakravarty S., Halperin B.I. and Nelson D.R., Phys. Rev. B 39 (1989) 2344.
92. Prudnikov A.P., Brichkov Yu.A. and Marichev O.I., Integrals and Sums (Science, Moscow, 1981) (In russian).
93. Preuss R., Hanke W. and von der Linden W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 1344.
94. Schmalian J., Langer M., Grabowski S. and Bennemann K.H., Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) 4336.
95. Matsumoto H. and Mancini F., Phys. Rev. B 55 (1997) 2095. In this work, the crossover to the renormalized classical regime is not clearly identified with the appearance of antiferromagnetic precursor bands. Nevertheless, the new features that appear at low temperature, in addition to Hubbard bands, are associated with antiferromagnetic correlations. We thank H. Matsumoto for correspondance on this subject.
96. Nozières P. and Schmitt-Rink S., J. Low Temp. Phys. 59 (1985) 195.
97. Sa de Mélo C.A.R., Randeria M. and Engelbrecht J.R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3202.
98. Trivedi N. and Randeria M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 312.
99. Tarenko R., Tarenko E. and Malek J., J. Phys. F 18 (1988) L87;
100. Müller-Hartmann E., Z. Phys. B 76 (1989) 211;
101. Schweitzer H. and Czycholl G., Z. Phys. B 83 (1991) 93.
102. McKenzie R.H. and Scarratt D., Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) R12709.
103. Schrieffer J.R., J. Low Temp. Phys. 99 (1995) 397.
104. X is similar to the one encountered in hot three-dimensional quantum electrodynamic plasmas. There, the photons play the role of fluctuations at their critical point. The divergences are logarithmic in frequency. Furthermore, since the photons can be taken into account order by order in a systematic manner, an infinite resummation is possible. In our case, the spin propagator is not really a different physical entity and, as we saw, it is not clear how to implement a systematic diagrammatic approach. For more details,
105. see Blaizot J.-P. and lancu E., Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 973.
106. Moreo A., Haas S., Sandvik A.W. and Dagotto E., Phys. Rev. B 51 (1995) 12045.
107. 4 suggest a pseudogap both above and below optimal doping, Startseva T., Timusk T., Puchkov A.V., Basov D.N., Mook H.A., Kimura T. and Kishio K., cond-mat/9706145.
108. Emery V.J. and Kivelson S.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 3253.
109. We thank D. Sénéchal and S. Pairault for discussion on this point.
110. Kalashnikov O.K. and Fradkin E.S., Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 59 (1972) 9;
111. Nolting W., Z. Phys. 255 (1972) 25;
112. White S.R., Phys. Rev. B 44 (1991) 4670.
113. Abrikosov A.A., Gorkov L.P. and Dzyaloshinski I.E., Methods of quantum field theory in statistical physics (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1963) Sect. 19.4.
114. Chitov G.Y. and Sénéchal D., cond-mat/9705037, Phys. Rev. B (in press).
115. Abrikosov A.A., Gorkov L.P. and Dzyaloshinski I.E., Methods of quantum field theory in statistical physics (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1963) Eq. (21.26).
116. Millis A.J., Phys. Rev. B 45 (1992) 13047.
117. Once the expression for the self-energy has been written in the form equation (68), it can be interpreted as the leading self-energy of an electron interacting with a bosonic excitation. Numerous studies of this kind of problem have appeared, including some where the bosonic excitation is softening. For a recent example, see Crisan M. and Tataru L., J. Superconductivity 8 (1995) 341;
118. Crisan M. and Tataru L., Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) 3597.
119. Baym G. and Pethick C., Landau Fermi Liquid Theory, Concepts and Applications (Wiley, New York, 1991).
120. For a microscopic calculation, see: Amit D.J., Kane J.W. and Wagner H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967) 425
121. and Phys. Rev. 175 (1968) 313.
122. Stamp P.C.E., J. Phys. I France 3 (1993) 625 Appendix A.
123. Hodges C., Smith H. and Wilkins J.W., Phys. Rev. 4 (1971) 302.
124. Ruvalds J. and Virosztek A., Phys. Rev. B 42 (1991) 4064.
125. Berk N.F. and Schrieffer J.R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 17 (1966) 433.
126. Stamp P.C.E., DPhil Thesis, University of Sussex (1983).
127. Bickers N.E., private communication.
128. de Dominicis C. and Martin P.C., J. Math. Phys. 5 (1964) 14.
129. Roulet B., Gavoret F. and Nozières P., Phys Rev. 178 (1969) 1072.
130. Bickers N.B. and Scalapino D.J., Phys. Rev. B 46 (1992) 8050. The proof that parquet equations are equivalent to the leading order of the l/N expansion is valid when there is a mode diverging in a single channel [94]. It is known that in one dimension parquet equations are much more general than the I/AT expansion because they contain interference terms between channels that are absent in the classical l/N expansion. These interference terms are the cause of the vanishing of the transition temperature in one dimension.
131. Engelbrecht J.R. and Bedell K.S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 4265.
132. Bulut N., Scalapino D.J. and White S.R., Phys. Rev. B 50 (1994) 9623.
133. Jackson F., MSc thesis, Université de Sherbrooke (unpublished).