Tragic choices in health care: Lessons from the child B case

British Medical Journal

Volumn 319, Issue 7219, 1999, Pages 1258-1261

  Ham, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE GRANULOCYTIC LEUKEMIA; CASE REPORT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE NEED; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; NONHODGKIN LYMPHOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SCHOOL CHILD; SHORT SURVEY;

EID: 0033530478     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7219.1258     Document Type: Short Survey

References (8)

1. 1 Ham C, Pickard S. Tragic choices in health care: the case of Child B. London: King's Fund, 1998.
2. 2 Hadorn D. Setting health care priorities in Oregon. Cost effectiveness meets the rule of rescue. JAMA 1991;265:2218-25.
3. 3 Draper H, Tunna K. Ethics and values for commissioners. Leeds: Nuffield Institute Health, 1996:44.
4. 4 Daniels N, Sabin J. Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation and the legitimacy problem for insurers. Philosoph Public Affairs 1997;26:303-50.
5. 5 Daniels N, Sabin J. The ethics of accountability in managed care reform. Health Affairs 1998;17:50-64.
6. 6 Daniels N, Sabin J. The ethics of accountability in managed care reform. Health Affairs 1998;17:57.
7. 7 Daniels N, Sabin J. Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation and the legitimacy problem for insurers. Philosoph Public Affairs 1997;26:327-8.
8. 8 Hadorn D. Emerging parallels in the American health care and legal-judicial systems. Am J Law Med 1992;18:73-96.