Nature conservation efforts by forest owners - Intentions and practice in a Swedish case study

Silva Fennica

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 459-475

  Uliczka, Helen ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Biodiversity assessment; Boreal forest; Forest conservation; Forest policy; Indicators; Policy implementation

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; DEFORESTATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FORECASTING; LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

FOREST OPERATIONS; FORESTRY ACT;

FORESTRY;

BOREAL FOREST; CONSERVATION PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FOREST MANAGEMENT; NATURE CONSERVATION;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

EID: 1942536208     PISSN: 00375330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14214/sf.485     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Angelstam, P. 1998. Maintaining and restoring biodiversity in European boreal forests by developing natural disturbance regimes. Journal of Vegetation Science 9(4): 593-602.
2. _ & Mikusinski, G. 1994. Woodpecker assemblages in natural and managed boreal and hemiboreal forest - a review. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31(1): 157-172.
3. Appelstrand, M. 2002. Participation and societal values: the challenge for lawmakers and policy practitioners. Forest Policy and Economics 4(4): 281-290.
4. Ask, P. 2002. Biodiversity and deciduous forest in landscape management. Studies in southern Sweden. Dissertation Silvestria 248. Swedish Univiversity of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp.
5. Berg, Å., Ehnström, B., Gustafsson, L., Hallingbäck, T., Jonsell, M. & Weslien, J. 1994. Threatened plant, animal and fungus species in Swedish forests: distribution and habitat associations. Conservation Biology 8(3): 718-731.
6. Björse, G. & Bradshaw, R. 1998. 2000 years of forest dynamics in southern Sweden: suggestions for forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 104(1-3): 15-26.
7. Bossuyt, B., Hermy, M. & Deckers, J. 1999. Migration of herbaceous plant species across ancient-recent forest ecotones in central Belgium. Journal of Ecology 87(4): 628-638.
8. Brunet, J. & Oheimb, G. von. 1998. Migration of vascular plants to secondary woodlands in southern Sweden. Journal of Ecology 86(3): 429-438.
9. Carlson, A. 2000. The effect of habitat loss on a deciduous forest specialist species: The White-backed Woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos). Forest Ecology and Management 131(1-3): 215-221.
10. Dettki, H. 1998. Dispersal of fragments of two pendulous lichen species. Sauteria 9: 123-132.
11. _ & Esseen, P.A. 2003. Modelling long-term effects of forest management on epiphytic lichens in northern Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management 175(1-3): 223-238.
12. Dykstra, D.P. & Heinrich, R. (eds.). 1996. Forest codes of practice: contributing to environmentally sound forest operations. FAO Forestry Paper 133. ISBN 92-5-103923-2.
13. Eckerberg, K. 1988. Clearfelling and environmental protection - results from an investigation in Swedish forests. Journal of Environmental Management 27(3): 237-256.
14. Egan, A., Gibson, D. & Whipkey, R. 2001. Evaluating the effectiveness of the forest stewardship program in West Virginia. Journal of Forestry 99: 31-36.
15. Ekelund, H. & Dahlin, C.-G. 1997. The Swedish case. Development of the Swedish forests and forest policy during the last 100 years. National Board of Forestry, Jönköping.
16. Elkie, P.C. & Rempel, R.S. 2001. Detecting scales of pattern in boreal forest landscapes. Forest Ecology and Management 147(2-3): 253-261.
17. Elliott, C. & Schlaepfer, R. 2001. The advocacy coalition framework: application to the policy process for the development of forest certification in Sweden. Journal of European Public Policy 8(4): 642-661.
18. Enoksson, B., Angelstam, P. & Larsson, K. 1995. Deciduous forest and resident birds: the problem of fragmentation within a coniferous forest landscape. Landscape Ecology 10(5): 267-275.
19. Esseen, P.-A., Renhorn, K.-E. & Pettersson, R.B. 1996. Epiphytic lichen biomass in managed and old-growth boreal forests: effect of branch quality. Ecological Applications 6(1): 228-238.
20. Ferlin, F., Pogacnik, N., Kutner, L. & Cater, M. 1999. Forest biological diversity in recent international and national legal documents. Zbornik gozdarstva in lesarstva 60: 237-279. (In Slovenian).
21. Forest Stewardship Council. 2000. Svensk FSC-standard för certifiering av skogsbruk. Andra upplagan 2000. Forest Stewardship Council A. C. (In Swedish).
22. Fridman, J., & Walheim, M. 2000. Amount, structure, and dynamics of dead wood on managed forestland in Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management 131(1-3): 23-36.
23. Gärdenfors, U. (ed.). 2000. Rödlistade arter i Sverige - the 2000 red list of Swedish species. ArtDatabanken, SLU Uppsala.
24. Gilg, A.W. & Kelly, M.P. 1997. The delivery of planning policy in Great Britain: explaining the implementation gap. New evidence from a case study in rural England. Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy 15(1): 19-36.
25. Götmark, F., Söderlund, H. & Thorell, M. 2000. Buffer zones for forest reserves: opinions of land owners and conservation value of their forest around nature reserves in southern Sweden. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1377-1390.
26. Green, P., & Peterken, G.F. 1997. Variation in the amount of dead wood in the woodlands of the Lower Wye Valley, UK in relation to the intensity of management. Forest Ecology and Management 98(3): 229-238.
27. Hågvar, S., Hågvar, G. & Mönnes, E. 1990. Nest site selection in Norwegian woodpeckers. Holarctic Ecology 13(2): 156-165.
28. Hammar, G. 1999. Naturvård i skogsbruk nära tätorter. Rapport 4992, Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm. ISBN 91-620-4992-5. (In Swedish).
29. Heywood, V.H. 1995. Global biodiversity assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
30. Hogl, K. 2002. Patterns of multi-level co-ordination for NFP-processes: learning from problems and success stories of European policy-making. Forest Policy and Economics 4(4): 301-312.
31. Hunter, M.L. 1999. Biological diversity. In: Hunter, M.L. (ed.). Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. p. 3-21.
32. Innes, J.L. 1993. 'New perspectives in forestry': a basis for a future forest management policy in Great Britain. Forestry 66(4): 395-421.
33. Johnston, B.E. 1993. Forests and UNCED '92: a foundation for the future. Forestry Chronicles 69(5): 539-544.
34. Jonsell, M., Weslien, J. & Ehnström, B. 1998. Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodiversity and Conservation 7(6): 749-764.
35. Kangas, J. & Niemelainen, P. 1996. Opinion of forest owners and the public on forests and their use in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 11: 269-280.
36. Kirby, K.J., Webster, S.D. & Antczak, A. 1991. Effects of forest management on stand structure and the quantity of fallen dead wood: some British and Polish examples. Forest Ecology and Management 43(1-2): 167-174.
37. Krosnick, J.A. 1990. Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology 50: 537-567.
38. Kuuluvainen, J., Karppinen, H. & Ovaskainen, V. 1996. Landowner objectives and nonindustrial private timber supply. Forest Science 42(3): 300-309.
39. Kuusinen, M. 1995. Cyanobacterial macrolichens on Populus tremula as indicators of forest continuity in Finland. Biological Conservation 75(1): 43-49.
40. _, 1996. Epiphyte flora and diversity of basal trunks of six old-growth forest tree species in southern and middle boreal Finland. Lichenologist 28: 443-463.
41. Lacaze, J.F. 2000. Forest management for recreation and conservation: new challenges. Forestry 73(2): 137-141.
42. Michaels, K. & Bornemissza, G. 1999. Effects of clearfell harvesting on lucanid beetles (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) in wet and dry sclerophyll forests in Tasmania. Journal of Insect Conservation 3(2): 85-95.
43. Mikusinski, G., Gromadzki, M. & Chylarecki, P. 2001. Woodpeckers as indicators of forest bird diversity. Conservation Biology 15(1): 208-217.
44. Naturvårdsverket. 1997. Framtidens skogsbruk. Rapport 4784. Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm. ISBN 91-620-4784-1. (In Swedish).
45. Nilsson, S., Niklasson, M., Hedin, J,. Aronsson, G., Gutowski, J.M., Linder, P., Ljungberg, H., Mikusinski, G. & Ranius, T. 2002. Densities of large living and dead trees in old-growth temperate and boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management 161(1-3): 189-204.
46. Reunanen, P., Mönkkönen, M. & Nikula, A. 2000. Managing boreal forest landscapes for flying squirrels. Conservation Biology 14(1): 218-226.
47. Riksrevisionsverket. 1999. Skogsvårdsorganisationens arbete för att jämställa miljömålet med produktionsmå let, RRV: 31. Riksrevisionsverket, Stockholm. (In Swedish).
48. Rose, F. 1992. Temperate forest management: its effect on bryophyte and lichen floras and habitats. In: Bates, J. & Farmer, A.M. (eds.). Bryophytes and lichens in a changing environment. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford.
49. Samuelsson, J., Gustafsson, L. & Ingelög, T. 1994. Dying and dead trees, a review of their importance for biodiversity. Swedish Threatened Species Unit, Uppsala.
50. Sandström, U. 1992. Cavities in trees: their occurrence, formation and importance for hole-nesting birds in relation to silvicultural practice. Licentiate dissertation. Institute of Wildlife Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
51. Schanz, H. 2002 National forest programmes as discursive institutions. Forest Policy and Economics 4(4): 269-279.
52. Skogsstyrelsen. 1990. Rikare skog. Skogsstyrelsens Förlag, Jönköping, Sweden. ISBN 91-85748-87-0. (In Swedish).
53. _ 1991. Tagen hänsyn vid slutavverkningar 1989-91. Meddelande 1991:4. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping. (In Swedish).
54. _ 1993. Skogsstyrelsens föreskrifter och allmänna råd (SKSFS 1993:2) till skogsvårdslagen (1979: 429). Skogsstyrelsens författningssamling. ISSN 0347-5212. (In Swedish).
55. _ 1994. Signalarter i projekt nyckelbiotoper. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping. (In Swedish).
56. _ 1997. Naturskydd och naturhänsyn i skogen. Meddelande 1997:1. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping. ISSN 0283-4413. (In Swedish).
57. _ 1999. Greener forests. National Board of Forestry, Skogsvå rdsorganisationens förlag, Jönköping, Sweden. ISBN 91-88462-38-2.
58. _ 2000. Skogsstatistisk årsbok. Skogsvårdsorganisationens förlag, Jönköping. (In Swedish).
59. _ 2002. Skog för naturvårdsändamål - uppföljning av frivilliga avsättningar, områdesskydd samt miljöhänsyn vid föryngringsavverkning. Meddelande 2002:02. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping. ISSN 1100-0295 (In Swedish).
60. _ & Naturvårdsverket. 1998. Den nya skogspolitikens effekter på biologisk mångfald. Rapport 4844. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping, and Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm. (In Swedish).
61. SOF. 1990. Sveriges fåglar. 2:a upplagan. Stockholm. (In Swedish).
62. Storaunet, K.O., Rolstad, J. & Groven, R. 2000. Reconstructing 100-150 years of logging history in coastal spruce forest (Picea abies) with special conservation values in central Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 15(6): 591-604.
63. Swedish Forestry Act. 1948. With complementary regulation from 1975; SFS 1948:237 and 1974: 1026. (In Swedish).
64. Swedish Forestry Act. 1948. With complementary regulation from 1975; SFS 1948:237 and 1974: 1026. (In Swedish).
65. Swedish Forestry Act. 1979. With complementary regulation from 1993; SFS 1979:429 and 1993: 553. (In Swedish).
66. Swedish Forestry Act. 1979. With complementary regulation from 1993; SFS 1979:429 and 1993: 553. (In Swedish).
67. Swenson, J. & Angelstam, P. 1993. Habitat separation by sympatric forest grouse in Fennoscandia in relation to boreal forest succession. Canadian Journal of Zoology 71(7): 1303-1310.
68. Tarrant, M.A. & Cordell, H.K. 1997. The effect of respondent characteristics on general attitude-behavior correspondence. Environment and Behavior 29: 618-637.
69. Uliczka, H. & Angelstam, P. 1999. Occurrence of epiphytic macrolichens in relation to tree species and tree age in managed boreal forest. Ecography 22(4): 395-404.
70. _ & Angelstam, P. 2000. Assessing conservation values of forest stands based on specialised lichens and birds. Biological Conservation 95(3): 343-351.
71. Villard, M.A. & Taylor, P.D. 1994. Tolerance to habitat fragmentation influences the colonization of new habitat by forest birds. Oecologia 98(2-3): 393-401.
72. Wieslander, G. 1936. The shortage of forest in Sweden during the 17th and 18th centuries. Sveriges Skogsvårdsförbunds tidskrift 34: 593-633. (In Swedish).