Occurrence of epiphytic macrolichens in relation to tree species and age in managed boreal forest

Ecography

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 396-405

  Uliczka, Helen ^a   Angelstam, Per ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIOINDICATOR; BOREAL FOREST; LICHEN;

SWEDEN;

BETULA; PICEA ABIES; PINUS SYLVESTRIS; POPULUS TREMULA;

EID: 0032876077     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00576.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Angelstam, P. 1998. Towards a logic for assessing biodiversity in boreal forest. In: Bachmann, P., Köhl, M. and Päivinen, R. (eds), Assessment of biodiversity for improved forest planning. Kluwer, pp. 301-313.
2. Anon. 1994. Signalarter i projekt nyckelbiotoper. Skogsstyrelsen Jönköping.
3. Attman, A. 1986. Svenskt järn och stål 1808-1914. - Jernkontorets bergshistoriska skriftserie 21.
4. Berg, Å. et al. 1994. Threatened plant, animal and fungus species in Swedish forests distribution and habitat associations. - Conserv. Biol. 8: 718-731.
5. Björkhem, U. and Lundmark, J.-E. 1975. Markkartering av Grimsös viltforskningsområde. - Skogshönskolan Rapport 23, Stockholm.
6. Bredesen, B. et al. 1994. Vurdering av indikatorarter for kontinuitet. granskog i Øst-Norge. - Siste Sjanse, Naturvernforbundet i Oslo and Akershus, Oslo.
7. Bruteig, I. E. 1993. Large-scale survey of the distribution and ecology of common epiphytic lichens on Pinus sylvestris in Norway. - Ann. Bot. Fennici 30: 161-179.
8. Degelius, G. 1954. The lichen genus Collema in Europe: morphology, taxonomy, ecology. - Inst. of Botany, Univ. of Uppsala, Sweden.
9. Dettki, H. 1998. Dispersal of fragments of two pendulous lichen species. - Sauteria 9: 123-132.
10. Esseen, P.-A., Renhorn, K.-E. and Pettersson, R. B. 1996. Epiphytic lichen biomass in managed and old-growth boreal forests: effect of branch quality. - Ecol. Appl. 6: 228-238.
11. Esseen, P.-A. et al. 1997. Boreal forests. - Ecol. Bull. 46: 16-47.
12. Hallingbäck, T. 1994. Ekologisk katalog över lavar. - ArtDatabanken, Swedish Univ. of Agricult. Sci., Uppsala.
13. Hallingbäck, T. 1995. Ekologisk katalog över mossor. ArtDatabanken, Swedish Univ. of Agricult. Sci., Uppsala.
14. Hallingbäck, T. 1996. Ekologisk katalog över svampar. -ArtDatabanken, Swedish Univ. of Agricult. Sci., Uppsala.
15. Hallingbäck, T. and Ingelög, T 1989. Åtgärder för att bevara luftföroreningshotade lavar och mossor. - Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Report 3679, Solna.
16. Hansson, L., Söderström, L. and Solbreck, C. 1992. The ecology of dispersal in relation to conservation. - In: Hansson, L. (ed.), Ecological principles of nature conservation. Elsevier, pp. 169-200.
17. Hermansson, J.-O., Lundquist, R. and Hallingbäck, T. 1993. Signalarter för Dalarna. - Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping.
18. Hultengren, S., Martinsson, P.-O. and Stenström, J. 1991. Lavar och luftföroreningar. Känslighetsklassning och indexberäkning av epifytiska lavar. - Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Report 3967, Solna.
19. Karström, M. 1992. The project One step ahead - a presentation. - Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 86: 103-114 (in Swedish with English summary).
20. Karström, M. 1993. Indikatorarter som biologisk inventeringsmetod. - In: Olsson, G. (ed.), Indikatorarter för identifiering av naturskogar i Norrbotten. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Report 4276, Solna, pp. 19-96.
21. Kruys, N. and Jonsson, B. G. 1997. Insular patterns of calicioid lichens in a boreal old-growth forest wetland mosaic. - Ecography 20: 605-613.
22. Kuusinen, M. 1994. Epiphytic lichen flora and diversity on Populus tremula in old-growth and managed forests of southern and middle boreal Finland. - Ann. Bot. Fennici 31: 245-260.
23. Kuusinen, M. 1996a. Cyanobacterial macrolichens on Populus tremula as indicators of forest continuity in Finland. -Biol. Conserv. 75: 43-49.
24. Kuusinen, M. 1996b. Epiphyte flora and diversity of basal trunks of six old-growth forest tree species in southern and middle boreal Finland. - Lichenologist 28: 443-463.
25. Kuusinen, M. et al. 1995. Threatened lichens in Finland. -Crypt. Bot. 5: 247-251.
26. Majewski, P. et al. 1995. Differences in the structure of the pine forest on deep sediment in pristine and managed taiga. - In: Angelstam, P., Mikusinski, G. and Travina, S. (eds), Research in eastern Europe to solve nature conservation problems in the Nordic countries. Swedish Univ. of Agricult. Sci., Dept of Wildlife Ecol., Rep. 28, Uppsala.
27. McCune, B. 1990. Rapid estimation of abundance of epiphytes on branches. - The Bryologist 93: 39-43.
28. Moberg, R. and Holmåsen, I. 1990. Lavar, en fälthandbok. -Interpublishing Stockholm.
29. Neitlich, P. N. and McCune, B. 1997. Hotspots of epiphytic diversity in two young managed forests. Conserv. Biol. 11: 172-182.
30. Nilsson, S. G. and Baranowski, R. 1994. Indikatorer på jätteträdskontinuitet - svenska förekomster av knäppare som är beroende av grova, levande träd. - Entomol. Tidskr. 115: 81-97 (in Swedish with English summary).
31. Nitare, J. and Norén, M. 1992. Nyckelbiotoper kartläggs i nytt projekt vid Skogsstyrelsen. - Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 86: 219-226 (in Swedish with English summary).
32. Rose, F. 1992. Temperate forest management: its effect on bryophyte and lichen floras and habitats. In: Bates, J. and Farmer A. M. (eds), Bryophytes and lichens in a changing environment. Oxford Sci. Publ., Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 211-233.
33. Rose, F. 1996. Lichenological indicators of age and environmental continuity in woodlands. - In: Brown, D. H., Hawksworth, D. L. and Bailey, R. H. (eds), Lichenology: progress and problems. Academic Press, pp. 279-307.
34. Santesson, R. 1993. The lichens and lichenicolos fungi of Sweden and Norway. SBT-förlaget, Lund.
35. Tibell, L. 1992. Crustose lichens as indicators of forest continuity in boreal coniferous forests. Nord. J. Bot. 12: 427-450.
36. Volkov, A. D., Gromtsev, A. N. and Sakovets, V. I. 1997. Climax forests in the north-western taiga zone of Russia: natural characteristics, present state and conservation problems. Karelian Research Centre, Pedrozavodsk.