A Functional Protein Chip for Pathway Optimization and in Vitro Metabolic Engineering

Science

Volumn 304, Issue 5669, 2004, Pages 428-431

  Jung, Gyoo Yeol ^a   Stephanopoulos, Gregory ^a  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATALYSIS; DNA; ENZYMES; GENES; METABOLITES; OPTIMIZATION; RNA;

LUCIFERASE; NUCLEOSIDE DIPHOSPHATE KINASE; PATHWAY OPTIMIZATION; TREHALOSE SYNTHESIS;

METABOLISM;

ENZYME; LUCIFERASE; MESSENGER RNA; NUCLEOSIDE DIPHOSPHATE KINASE; RNA; TREHALOSE;

BIOLOGY;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CHIMERA; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME IMMOBILIZATION; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN MICROARRAY; RNA HYBRIDIZATION; SYNTHESIS;

CATALYSIS; DNA; ENZYMES, IMMOBILIZED; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GLUCOSE; GLUCOSYLTRANSFERASES; HEXOKINASE; KINETICS; LUCIFERASES; METABOLISM; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; NUCLEOSIDE-DIPHOSPHATE KINASE; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PHOSPHOGLUCOMUTASE; PHOSPHORIC MONOESTER HYDROLASES; PROTEIN ARRAY ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; RNA, MESSENGER; TREHALOSE; UTP-GLUCOSE-1-PHOSPHATE URIDYLYLTRANSFERASE;

EID: 1942520229     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1096920     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. G. Stephanopoulos, J. J. Vallino, Science 252, 1675 (1991).
2. W. R. Farmer, J. C. Liao, Nature Biotechnol. 18, 533 (2000).
3. W. J. Pitts et al., J. Med. Chem. 43, 27 (2000).
4. R. A. Mehl et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 935 (2003).
5. J. Hugenholtz et al., Antonie Leeuwenhoek 82, 217 (2002).
6. D. E. Stafford et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 1801 (2002).
7. M. I. Klapa, J. C. Aon, G. Stephanopoulos, Eur. J. Biochem. 270, 3525 (2003).
8. M. Koffas, G. Y. Jung, G. Stephanopoulos, Metab. Eng. 5, 32 (2003).
9. G. Stephanopoulos, A. Aristidou, J. Nielsen, Metabolic Engineering (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1998).
10. R. W. Roberts, J. W. Szostak, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94, 12297 (2097).
11. S. Weng et al., Proteomics 2, 48 (2002).
12. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
13. S. Karamohamed, T. Nordstrom, P. Nyren, Biotechniques 26, 728 (2099).
14. C. Schiraldi, I. Di Lernia, M. De Rosa, Trends Biotechnol. 20, 420 (2002).
15. H. Jorgensen, L. Olsson, B. Ronnow, E. A. Palmqvist, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 59, 310 (2002).
16. Z. Chi, J. Liu, J. Ji, Z. Meng, J. Biotechnol. 102, 135 (2003).
17. We did not actually measure the activities of the five enzymes; their actual amounts and activities were controlled by the amount of the corresponding homologous capture DNA that was spotted on the well of the 96-well microplate.
18. Capture DNA molecules for each enzyme used in this study are as follows: udpgp, 5′-GCGCTGCT-CAAGGAGTGATT-3′; hxk1, 5′ -CAACTTTTC-GATATCGGAAA-3′; pgm, 5′-CGTCTTTATCAAG-GTGCATA-3′; otsA, 5′-CAAGAACGCCCGGATTG-GCT-3′; otsB, 5′ -TCACCTTTACTGGTACCTCT-3′. Trehalose synthesis was carried out in the buffer containing 50 mM tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 10 mM magnesium chloride, 110 mM glucose, 55 mM adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP), 16.7 mM uridine 5′-triphosphate, and 16.7 μg of glucose-1,6-bisphosphate per milliliter of solution for 3 hours at 30°C. Synthesized trehalose was measured using the method for acid trehalase (23).
19. M. A. Blázques, R. Lagunas, C. Gancedo, J. M. Gancedo, FEBS Lett. 329, 51 (1993).
20. J. M. Thevelein, S. Hohmann, Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 3 (1995).
21. B. Teusink, M. C. Walsh, K. van Dam, H. V. Westerhoff, Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 162 (1998).
22. H. Kacser, L. Acerenza, Eur. J. Biochem. 216, 361 (1993).
23. I. Kienle, M. Burgert, H. Holzer, Yeast 9, 907 (1993).
24. We acknowledge support from the DuPont-MIT Alliance and the Singapore MIT Alliance.