The evaluation of low dose hyper-radiosensitivity in normal human skin

Radiotherapy and Oncology

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 319-329

  Harney, Jackie ^a   Shah, Nihal ^a   Short, Susan ^b   Daley, Francis ^b   Groom, Nicki ^a   Wilson, George D ^c   Joiner, Michael C ^c   Saunders, Michele I ^a  

^a MOUNT VERNON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b Gray Cancer Institute   (United Kingdom)

^c WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Basal cell density; Hyper radiosensitivity; Low dose hyper radiosensitivity; Radiation; Skin

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BASAL CELL; CELL DENSITY; CELL PROLIFERATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE TIME EFFECT RELATION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYPERSENSITIVITY; LOW DOSE HYPERRADIOSENSITIVITY; MALE; MODEL; NONLINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PATIENT; PELVIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION RESPONSE; RADIOSENSITIVITY; SKIN; SKIN BIOPSY; TISSUE;

ANTIGENS, CD30; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CELL COUNT; CELL DIVISION; DOSE FRACTIONATION; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIOTHERAPY DOSAGE; SKIN; SKIN NEOPLASMS; UTERINE NEOPLASMS;

EID: 1942471059     PISSN: 01678140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.01.015     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Archambeau J.O., Bennet G.W. Quantification of morphologic, cytologic and kinetic parameters of unirradiated swine skin: a histologic model. Radiat Res. 98:1984;254-273.
2. Archambeau J.W., Hauser D., Shymko R.M. Swine basal cell proliferation during a course of daily irradiation, 5 days a week for 6 weeks. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 15:1988;1383-1388.
3. Archambeau J.O., Pezner R., Wasserman T. Pathophysiology of irradiated skin and breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 31:(5):1995;1171-1185.
4. Bauer F.W., Crombag N.H., Grood R.M., et al. Flow cytometry as a tool for the study of cell kinetics in epidermis. Br J Dermatol. 102:1980;629-639.
5. Boezeman J.B.M., Bauer F.W., de Grood R.M. Flow cytometric analysis of the recruitment of G0 cells in human epidermis in vivo following tape stripping. Cell Tissue Kinet. 20:1987;90-107.
6. Castelijns F.A.C.M., Ezendam J., Latijnhouwers M.A.H.E., et al. Epidermal cell kinetics by combining in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry. Histochem J. 30:1998;869-877.
7. Desdouets C, Sobczak-Thepot J, Murphy M, et al. Cyclin A: Function and expression during cell proliferation. Progress in Cell Cycle Research, 1995; Vol. 1, 115-1213.
8. Dorner D., Eicheler W., Dorfler A., Beaumann M. HRS effects of ultrafractionation on the basal cell layer in mouse skin. Radiother Oncol. 64:2002;S57.
9. Fowler J.F. The linear quadratic formula and progression in fractionated radiotherapy. Br J Radiol. 62:1989;679-694.
10. Gerdes J., Lemke H., Baish H., et al. Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J Immunol. 133:1984;1710-1715.
11. Glade C.P., Seegers B.A., Meulin E.F.J., et al. Multiparametric flow cytometric characterisation of epidermal cell suspensions prepared from normal and hyperproliferative human skin using an optimised thermolysin-trypsin protocol. Arch Dermatol Res. 288:1996;203-210.
12. Hamilton C.S., Denham J.W., O'Brien M. Underprediction of human skin erythema at low doses per fraction by the linear quadratic model. Radiother Oncol. 40:(1):1996;23-30.
13. Heenan M., Thiriar S., Noel J.C., Galand P. Ki-67 immunostaining of normal human epidermis: comparison with 3H-thymidine labelling and PCNA immunostaining. Dermatology. 197:1998;123-126.
14. Hopewell J.W. The skin: it's structure and response to ionising radiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 57:1990;751-773.
15. Joiner M.C., Denekamp J., Maughan R.L. The use of top-up experiments to investigate the effect of very small doses per fraction in mouse skin. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys, Chem Med. 49:1986;565-580.
16. Joiner M.C., Johns H. Renal damage in the mouse: the response to very small doses per fraction. Radiat Res. 114:1988;385-398.
17. Joiner M.C., Marples B., Johns H. The response of tissues to very low doses per fraction: a reflection of induced repair? Recent Results Cancer Res. 130:1993;27-40.
18. Joiner M.C., Marples B., Lambin P., et al. Low dose hypersensitivity: current status and possible mechanisms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 49:2001;379-389.
19. Landberg G., Roos G. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Ki-67 antigen expression in human haematopoetic cells during growth stimulation and differentiation. Cell Prolif. 26:(5):1993;427-437.
20. de Mare S., van Erp P.E.J., Ramaekers F.C.S., et al. Flow cytometric quantification of human epidermal cells expressing keratin 16 in vivo after standardised trauma. Arch Dermatol. 282:1990;126-130.
21. Morris M., Hamlet R., Hopewell J.W. The cell kinetics of the epidermis and follicular epithelium of the rat: variations with age and body site. Cell Tissue Kinet. 22:1989;213-222.
22. Morris G.M., Hopewell J.W. Pig epidermis: a cell kinetic study. Cell Tissue Kinet. 18:1985;407-415.
23. Nyman J., Turesson I. Basal cell density in human skin for various fractionation schedules in radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 33:1994;117-124.
24. Nyman J., Turesson I. Changes in the basal cell density in pig skin after single radiation doses with different dose rates. Acta Oncol. 30:(6):1991;753-759.
25. Onuma H., Mastui C., Morohashi M. Quantitative analysis of the proliferation of epidermal cells using a human skin organ culture system and the effect of DBcAMP using markers of proliferation (BrdU, Ki-67, PCNA). Arch Dermatol Res. 293:2001;133-138.
26. Parkins C.F., Fowler J. The linear quadratic fit for lung function after irradiation with X-rays at smaller doses per fraction than 2 Gy. Br J Cancer Suppl. 7:1986;320-323.
27. Penneys N.S., Fulton J.E., Weinstein G.S., et al. Location of proliferating cells in human epidermis. Arch Dermatol. 101:1970;323-329.
28. Philips A., Huet X., Piet A., et al. Cyclin A: a good marker for the study of cell cycle control and tumour progression. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 192:(2):1998;223-230.
29. Pinkus H. Examination of the epidermis by the strip method. II. Biometric data on regeneration of the human epidermis. J Invest Dermatol. 19:1952;431-447.
30. Potten C. Radiation and skin. 1985;Taylor and Francis, London. p. 182-192.
31. Scott R.J., Hall P.A., Haldane J., et al. A comparison of immunohistochemical markers of cell proliferation with experimentally determined growth fraction. J Pathol. 165:(2):1991;173-178.
32. Thames H.D., Bentzen S.M., Turesson I., et al. Fractionation parameters for human tissues and tumours. Int J Radiat Biol. 56:1994;457-464.
33. Turesson I., Bernefors R., Book M., et al. Normal tissue response to low doses of radiotherapy assessed by molecular markers: a study of skin in patients treated for prostate cancer. Acta Oncol. 8:2001;941-951.
34. Tzaphlidou M., Kounadi E., Leontiou I., et al. Influence of low doses of gamma-irradiation on mouse skin collagen fibrils. Int J Radiat Biol. 71:1997;109-115.
35. Van der Aardweg G.J.M., Mooi W.J. Determination of colony numbers in pig epidermis as an estimate for radiosensitivity. A rapid assay based on in vitro BrdU-labelling. Br J Radiol. 72:1999;1104-1109.
36. Van der Aardweg G.J.M., Morris G.M., Bywaters A., et al. Changes in epidermal radiosensitivity with time associated with increased colony numbers. Br J Radiol. 74:2001;434-444.
37. Van Erp P.E.J., Groenendal H., Bauer F.W., et al. Growth fraction in epidermal skin disorders determined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J Invest Dermatol. 89:1987;312.
38. Van Erp P.E.J., Rijzewijk J.J., Boezeman J.B.M., et al. Flow cytometric analysis of epidermal subpopulations from normal and psoriatic skin using monoclonal antibodies against intermediate filaments. Am J Pathol. 135:1989;865-870.
39. Wong C.S., Minkin S., Hill R.P. Linear quadratic model underestimates sparing effect of small doses per fraction in rat spinal cord. Radiother Oncol. 23:1992;176-184.
40. Wouters B.G., Skarsgard L.D. Low-dose radiation sensitivity and induced radioresistance to cell killing in HT-29 cells is distinct from the adaptive response and cannot be explained by a subpopulation of sensitive cells. Radiat Res. 148:1997;435-442.