Can't hedgehogs be foxes too? Reply to Clarence N. Stone

Journal of Urban Affairs

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 27-33

  Davies, Jonathan S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1942466408     PISSN: 07352166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0735-2166.2004.00003.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bache, I. (2003). Governing through governance: Education policy control under New Labour. Political Studies, 51(2), 300-314.
2. Beck, J. (1999). Makeover or takeover? The Strange death of educational autonomy in neo-liberal England. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 223-238.
3. Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital. A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago, Chicago University Press.
4. Butler, D., Adonis, A., & Travers, T. (1994). Failure in British government: The politics of the poll tax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Callinicos, A. T. (1989). Against pots-modernism: A Marxist critique. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6. Cammack, P. (in press). Giddens' way with words. In L. Martell, S. Hale, & W. Leggett, (Eds.), The third way and beyond: Criticisms, futures and alternatives. Manchester, Manchester University Press.
7. Coates, D., & Hay, C. (2001). The internal and external face of New Labour's political economy. Government and opposition, 36(4), 447-471
8. Daland, R. T. (1969). Comparative urban research: The administration and politics of cities. London: Sage.
9. Davies, J. S. (2001). Partnerships and regimes: The politics of urban regeneration in the UK. Aldershot: Ashgate.
10. Davies, J. S. (2002a). Urban regime theory: A normative-empirical critique. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(1), 1-17.
11. Davies, J. S. (2002b). The governance of urban regeneration: A critique of the governing without government thesis. Public Administration, 80(2), 301-322.
12. Davies, J. S. (2003). Partnerships versus regimes: Why regime theory cannot explain urban coalitions in the UK. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(3), 253-269.
13. Elkin, S. L. (1979). Castells, Marxism and the new urban politics. Comparative Urban Research, 7(2), 22-33
14. Elkin, S. L. (1987). City and regime in the American republic. University of Chicago Press.
15. Elkin, S. L. (1994). Business-state relations in the commercial republic. Journal of Political Philosophy, 22, 115-139.
16. Fullerton, T. M. (2001). Educational attainment and border economic performance. Economic and Financial Review. Third Quarter. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
17. Hay, C., & Wincott, D. (1998). Structure, agency and historical institutionalism. Political Studies, XLVI, 951-957.
18. Imbroscio, D. L. (2003). Overcoming the neglect of economics in urban regime theory. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(3), 271-284.
19. Lloyd, C., & Payne, J. (2002). On the political economy of skills: assessing the possibilities for a viable high skills project in the UK. New Political Economy, 7(3), 367-395.
20. Lowndes, V., & Wilson, D. (2003). Balancing revisability and robustness? A new institutionalist perspective on local government modernisation. Public Administration, 81(2), 275-298.
21. Marquand, D. (1998, May 20). What lies at the heart of the people's project? The Guardian.
22. Mason, G. (2002). High skills utilisation under mass higher education: Graduate employment in service industries in Britain. Journal of Education and Work, 15(4), 427-456
23. Meadway, J. (2003). Life after capitalism. International Socialism, 100, 113-130.
24. Mossberger, K., & Stoker, G. (2001). The evolution of urban regime theory: The challenge of conceptualization. Urban Affairs Review, 36(6), 810-835.
25. Stoker, G. (1995). Regime theory and urban politics. In D. Judge, G. Stoker, & H. Wolman (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (pp. 54-71). London: Sage.
26. Stone, C. N. (1980). Systemic power in community decision making: A restatement of stratification theory. American Political Science Review, 74, 978-990.
27. Stone, C. N. (1991). The hedgehog, the fox and the new urban politics: Rejoinder to Kevin R. Cox. Journal of Urban Affairs, 13(3), 289-297.
28. Stone, C. N. (1993). Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15(1), 1-28.
29. Stone, C. N. (2001). The Atlanta experience re-examined: The link between agenda and regime change. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(1), 20-34.
30. Stone, C. N. (2002). Building urban coalitions around social-regeneration agendas: Putting Humpty Dumpty together. Paper presented at the Norwegian Research Council Seminar on Urban Development Challenges for Planning, Politics and Research, Bergen, Norway.
31. Stone, C. N. (2003). Civic cooperation in El Paso: Case studies in community partnerships No. 1. A National Taskforce for the Future of Urban Districts. School Communities that Work: An Initiative of the Annenberg Institute for School Reform. Available: http://www.schoolcommunities.org/Portfolio/ElPaso.html [November 2003].
32. Stone, C. N. (2004). It's more than the economy after all: Continuing the debate about urban regimes. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26, 1-19.
33. Stone, C. N., Henig, J. R., Jones, B. D., & Pierannunzi, C. (2001). Building civic capacity. The politics of reforming urban schools. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
34. Wainwright, H. (2003). Reclaim the state. Experiments in popular democracy. London: Verso.