Partnership versus regimes: Why regime theory cannot explain urban coalitions in the UK

Journal of Urban Affairs

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 253-270

  Davies, Jonathan S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON; PARTNERSHIP APPROACH; RENEWAL POLICY; URBAN RENEWAL;

UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0142009979     PISSN: 07352166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9906.00164     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Althusser, L. (1979). For Marx. London: Verso.
2. Atkinson, R. (1995). Post war urban policy in Britain. Policy Studies, 16(4), 6-17.
3. Austen, J., & McCaffrey, A. (2002). Business leadership coalitions and public-private partnerships in American cities: A business perspective on regime theory. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(1), 35-54.
4. Bennett, C. J. (1991a). How states utilise foreign evidence. Journal of Public Policy, 11(1), 31-54.
5. Bennett, C. J. (1991b). Review article: What is policy convergence and what causes it? British Journal of Political Science, 21, 215-233.
6. Berger, R., & Foster, R. S. (1982, November). Public private partnership: The British experience. Council for International Urban Liaison.
7. Boddy, M., & Fudge, C. (Eds.). (1984). Local socialism. London: Macmillan.
8. Boyle, R. (Ed.). (1985). Leveraging urban development: A comparison of urban policy directions and programme impact in the United States and Britain. Policy and Politics, 13(2), 175-210.
9. Cox, K. R. (1995). Globalisation, competition and the politics of local economic development. Urban Studies, 32(2), 213-224.
10. Davies, J. S. (2001). Partnerships and regimes: The politics of regeneration partnerships in the UK. Aldershot: Ashgate.
11. Davies, J. S. (2002a). Urban regime theory: A normative-empirical critique. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(1), 1-17.
12. Davies, J. S. (2002b). The governance of urban regeneration: A critique of the governing without government thesis. Public Administration, 80(2), 301-322.
13. Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions. (DTLR). (2001). Strong local leadership, quality local services.
14. DiGaetano, A., & Klemanski, J. S. (1993). Urban regimes in comparative perspective: The politics of urban development in Britain. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 29(1), 54-83.
15. Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44, 343-357.
16. Elkin, S. L. (1985). Economic and political rationality. The Journal of the Northeastern Political Science Association, XVIII(2), 253-271.
17. Elkin, S. L. (1987). City and regime in the American republic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Elkin, S. L. (1994). Business-state relations in the commercial republic. Journal of Political Philosophy, 2(2), 115-139.
19. Evans, M. G., & Davies, J. S. (1999). Understanding policy transfer: A multi-level, multi-disciplinary perspective. Public Administration, 77(2), 361-385.
20. Hall, T., & Hubbard, P. (1996). The entrepreneurial city: New urban politics, new urban geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 20(2), 153-174.
21. Harding, A. (1994). Urban regimes and growth machines: Toward a cross national research agenda. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 29(3), 356-383.
22. Harding, A. (1996). Is there a new community power and why should we need one? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 20(4), 637-655.
23. Harding, A. (1997). Urban regimes in a Europe of the cities. European Urban and Regional Studies, 4(4), 291-314.
24. Harding, A. (2000). Regime formation in Manchester and Edinburgh. In G. Stoker (Ed.). The new politics of British local governance (pp. 54-71). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
25. Harding, A., & Le Gales, P. (1997). Globalization, urban change and urban policies in Britain and France. In A. Scott (Ed.), The limits of globalization (pp. 181-201). New York: Routledge.
26. John, P. (1997). Local governance. In P. Dunleavy, A. Gamble, I. Holliday, & G. Peele (Eds.), Developments in British politics 5 (pp. 253-276). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
27. Lauria, M. (Ed.). (1997). Reconstructing urban regime theory: Regulation urban politics in a global economy. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
28. Lawless, P. (1994). Partnership in urban regeneration in the UK: The Sheffield central area study. Urban Studies, 31(8), 1303-1324.
29. Offe, C. (1985). Disorganised capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30. Osler, D. (2002). Labour Party PLC: New Labour as a Party of Business. Mainstream Publishing.
31. Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (1995). Business goes local: Dissecting the Business Agenda in Manchester. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 19(1), 55-78.
32. Peterson, P. (1981). City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government, Political Studies, XLIV, 652-667.
34. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
35. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1999). Foreword: Governance and networks. In G. Stoker (Ed.), The new management of British local governance (pp. xii-xxvi). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
36. Rhodes, R. A. W., & Marsh, D. (1992). New directions in the study of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21, 181-205.
37. Sassen, S. (1991). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
38. Social Exclusion Unit. (SEU). (2001). A new commitment to neighbourhood renewal: National strategy action plan. London: HMSO.
39. Stoker, G. (1990). Regulation theory, local government and the transition from Fordism. In D. S. King & J. Pierre (Eds.), Challenges to local government. London: Sage.
40. Stoker, G. (1995). Regime theory and urban politics. In D. Judge, G. Stoker, & H. Wolman (Eds.), Theories of Urban Politics (pp. 54-71). London: Sage.
41. Stoker, G., & Mossberger, K. (1994). Urban regime theory in comparative perspective. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 12, 195-212.
42. Stone, C. N. (1980). Systemic power in community decision making: A restatement of stratification theory. American Political Science Review, 74, 978-990.
43. Stone, C. N. (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
44. Stone, C. N. (1993). Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15, 1-28.
45. Stone, C. N. (Ed.). (1998). Changing urban education. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
46. Stone, C. N. (2001). The Atlanta experience re-examined: The link between agenda and regime change. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(1), 20-34.
47. Ward, K. (1996). Rereading urban regime theory: A sympathetic critique. Geoforum, 27(4), 427-438.
48. Ward, K. G. (1997). Coalitions in urban regeneration: A regime approach. Environment and Planning A, 29(8), 1493-1506.
49. Wolman, H. (1992). Understanding cross national policy transfers: The case of Britain and the US. Governance, 5(10), 27-45.
50. Wood, A. (1996). Analysing the politics of local economic development: Making sense of cross-national convergence. Urban Studies, 33(8), 1281-1295.