Identification and assessment of gifted students with learning disabilities

Theory into Practice

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 115-124

  Ruban, Lilia M ^a   Reis, Sally M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18944392594     PISSN: 00405841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4402_6     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Baum, S., & Owen, S. V. (1988). High ability/learning disabled students: How are they different? Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 321-326.
2. Baum, S. M. (2004). Introduction. In T. M. Newman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Students with both gifts and learning disabilities (pp. 1-15). New York: Kluwer.
3. Baum, S. M., Cooper, C. R., & Neu, T. W. (2001). Dual differentiation: An approach for meeting the curricular needs of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 477-490.
4. Baum, S. M., & Owen, S. V. (2004). To be gifted and learning disabled: Strategies for helping bright students with LD, ADHD, and more. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
5. Baum, S. M., Owen, S. V., & Dixon, J. (1991). To be gifted and learning disabled: From identification to practical identification strategies. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
6. Boodoo, G. M., Bradley, C. L., Frontera, R. L., Pitts, J. R., & Wright, L. B. (1989) A survey of procedures used for identifying gifted learning disabled children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 110-114.
7. Bradley, R., Danielson, L., & Hallahan, D. P. (Eds.). (2002). Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. Brody, L., & Mills, C. (1997). Gifted children with learning disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities, 30, 282-296.
9. Brody, L., & Mills, C. (2004). Linking assessment and diagnosis to intervention for gifted students with learning disabilities. In T. M. Newman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Students with both gifts and learning disabilities (pp. 73-94). New York: Kluwer.
10. Davis, G., & Rimm, S. (2002). Education of gifted and talented students. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., & Fernstrom, P. (1993). A conservative approach to special education reform: Mainstreaming through transenvironmental programming and curriculum-based measurement. American Education Research Journal, 30, 149-178.
12. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
13. Gresham, F. M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 467-519). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14. Hishinuma, E., & Tadaki, S. (1996). Addressing diversity of the gifted/at risk: Characteristics for identification. Gifted Child Today, 19, 20-25, 28-29, 45, 50.
15. Individuals with Disabilities Act Amendments (IDEA) of 1997. (1997). Public Law 105-17.
16. Lupart, J. L. (2004). Unraveling the mysteries of GLD: Toward the application of cognitive theory to assessment. In T. M. Newman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Students with both gifts and learning disabilities (pp. 49-72). New York: Kluwer.
17. Lyon, G. A., Gray, D. B., Kavanagh, J. F., & Krasnegor, N. A. (Eds.). (1993). Better understanding learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policies. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
18. MacMillan, D. L., Gresham, F. M., Siperstein, G. N., & Bocian, K. M. (1996). The labyrinth of I.D.E.A.: School decisions on referred students with subaverage general intelligence. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, 161-174.
19. MacMillan, D. L., & Siperstein, G. N. (2002). Learning disabilities as operationally defined by schools. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 287-333). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
20. Maker, C. J. (1977). Providing programs for the handicapped gifted. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
21. Mauser, A. J. (1981). Programming strategies for pupils with disabilities who are gifted. Rehabilitation Literature, 42, 270-275.
22. McCoach, D. B., Kehle, T. J., Bray, M. A., & Siegle, D. (2004). The identification of gifted students with learning disabilities: Challenging, controversies, and promising practices. In T. M. Newman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Students with both gifts and learning disabilities (pp. 31-48). New York: Kluwer.
23. Newman, T. M. (2004). Interventions work, but we need more! In T. M. Newman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Students with both gifts and learning disabilities (pp. 235-246). New York: Kluwer.
24. Nielsen, E., Higgins, D. H., & Hammond, A. (1995). Twice exceptional learners: Gifted students with disabilities. Alburquerque: University of New Mexico.
25. Nielsen, M. E. (2002). Gifted students with learning disabilities: Recommendations for identification and programming. Exceptionality, 10, 93-111.
26. Olenchak, F. R. (1994). Talent development: Accommodating the social and emotional needs of secondary gifted/learning disabled students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 5, 40-52.
27. Olenchak, F. R. (1995). Effects of enrichment on gifted/learning disabled students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 385-399.
28. Purcell, J. H., & Renzulli, J. S. (1998). Total Talent Portfolio. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
29. Reis, S. M., McGuire, J. M., & Neu, T. W. (2000). Compensation strategies used by high ability students with learning disabilities who succeed in college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 123-134.
30. Reis, S. M., Neu, T. W., & McGuire, J. M. (1997). Case studies of high-ability students with learning disabilities who have achieved. Exceptional Children, 63, 463-479.
31. Reis, S. M., Neu, T. W., & McGuire, S. M. (1995). Talents in two places: Case studies of high ability students with learning disabilities who have achieved (Research Monograph 95114). Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
32. Reis, S. M., & Ruban, L. M. (2004). Compensation strategies used by high ability students with learning disabilities. In T. M. Newman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Students with both gifts and learning disabilities (pp. 155-194). New York: Kluwer.
33. Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
34. Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Renzulli, J. S. (1992). A general theory for the development of creative productivity in young people. In F. Mönks & W. Peters (Eds.), Talent for the future (pp. 51-72). AssenMaastricht, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
36. Renzulli, J. S., & Smith, L. H. (1978). Compactor. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
37. Renzulli, R. J., & Reis, S. M. (1985). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
38. Renzulli, R. J., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A how-to guide to educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
39. Robinson, S. M. (1999). Meeting the needs of students who are gifted and have learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 195-295.
40. Silverman, L. K. (1989). Invisible gifts, invisible handicaps. Roeper Review, 12, 37-42.
41. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. New York: Plume.
42. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge, CT: Cambridge University Press.
43. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2004). Learning disabilities, giftedness, and gifted/LD. In T. M. Newman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Students with both gifts and learning disabilities (pp. 17-31). New York: Kluwer.
44. U.S. Department of Education. (1995). Seventeenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Act. Washington, DC: Author.
45. U.S. Department of Education. (1998). Twentieth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Act. Washington, DC: Author.
46. U.S. Office of Education. (1976). Proposed rulemaking. Federal Register, 41, 54404-52407. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
47. U.S. Office of Education. (1977). Assistance to states for education of handicapped children: Procedures for evaluating specific learning disabilities. Federal Register, 42, 65082-65085. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
48. Yewchuk, C., & Lupart, J. L. (2000). Inclusive education for gifted students with disabilities. In K. Heller, F. Monks, R. Sternberg, & R. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 659-670). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Science