Constructing the divide: Spatial disparities in broadband access

Papers in Regional Science

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 197-221

  Grubesic, Tony H ^a   Murray, Alan T ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital divide; DSL; GIS; Internet; Maximal covering location problem

Indexed keywords

BROADBAND DATA; GIS; HOUSEHOLD SURVEY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0005235479     PISSN: 10568190     EISSN: 14355957     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s101100100096     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abe G (2000) Residential broadband. Cisco Press, Indianapolis
2. Bar F, Cohen S, Cowhey P, DeLong B, Kleeman M, Zysman J (1999) Defending the Internet revolution in the broadband era: When doing nothing is doing harm. URL: http://econoray.berkeley.edu/pubs/wp/ewp12.html
3. Castells M (1996) The rise of the network society. Blackwell, Oxford
4. Cairncross F (1997) The death of distance: How the communications revolution will change our lives. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
5. Cartwright J (2000) Introduction to load coils and bridge taps. URL: http://pmr.infinet.net/load-coils_primer.html
6. Church RL (1984) The planar maximal covering location problem. Journal of Regional Science 24: 185-201
7. Church RL, ReVelle CS (1974) The maximal covering location problem. Papers of the Regional Science Association 32: 101-118
8. Clarke DBA, Lampard G, Merrett RP, Smith DW, Wakeling JF, Whitley TJ, Young G (1998) Emerging broadband access technologies. BT Technology Journal 16: 187-195
9. Cohon J (1978) Multi-objective programming and planning. Academic Press, New York COVAD (2000) URL: http://www.covad.com
10. Downes T, Greenstein S (1998) Universal access and local commercial Internet markets. URL: http://www.kellogg.nwu.edu/faculty/greenstein/images/ research.html
11. DSL Reports (2000) URL: http://www.dslreports.com
12. Entman R (1999) Residential access to bandwidth: Exploring new paradigms. The Aspen Institute, Washington DC
13. First Direct Bank (2000) URL: http://www.firstdirect.com/home.html
14. Foster KT, Young G, Cook JW, Clarke DEA, Kirkby RH, Booth MG (1998) Realising the potential of access networks using DSL. BT Technology Journal 16: 34-47
15. Gillespie A, Williams H (1988) Telecommunications and the reconstruction of regional comparative advantage. Environment and Planning A 20: 1311-1321
16. German S, Malecki E (2000) The networks of the Internet: An analysis of provider networks in the USA. Telecommunications Policy 24: 113-134
17. Graham S, Marvin S (1996) Telecommunications and the city. Routledge, London
18. Hoffman DL, Novak T (2000) The evolution of the digital divide: Examining the relationship of race to Internet access and usage over time. URL: http://www2000.ogsm.vanderbilt.edu/papers.html
19. Ims LA, Ravera M, Balzaretti S, Ferrero U, De Bortoli M, Stordahl K, Olsen BT (1998) Access network technologies. In: Ims LA (eds) Broadband access networks. Chapman & Hall, London
20. Kushnick B (2001) The Bell monopolies are killing DSL, broadband, and competition. Boardwatch Magazine January: 146-148
21. Moss ML, Townsend A (2000) The Internet backbone and the American metropolis. Information Society Journal 16: 35-47
22. Murray AT, Davis R (2001) Equity in regional service provision. Journal of Regional Science (forth-coming)
23. Murray AT, O'Kelly ME (2001) Spatial and representation and coverage in location analysis. Manuscript, The Ohio State University
24. Newton H (2000) Newton's telecom dictionary. Telecom Books, New York
25. NTIA - National Telecommunications and Information Administration (1995) Falling through the net. URL: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/
26. NTIA - National Telecommunications and Information Administration (1998) Falling through the net II: New data on the digital divide. URL: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/
27. NTIA - National Telecommunications and Information Administration (1999) Falling through the net: Defining the digital divide. URL: http://www.ntia.doc. gov/
28. NTIA - National Telecommunications and Information Administration (2000) Advanced telecommunications in rural America. URL: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/
29. Openshaw S, Taylor P (1981) The modifiable areal unit problem. In: Wrigley N, Bennett, R (eds) Quantitative geography: a British view. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
30. Qram A (1999) A tale of two cities going online. American Reporter. URL: http://www.oreilly.com/~andyo/ar/municipal_palo.alto.html.
31. Paradyne (2000) URL: http://www.paradyne.com
32. Richardson R (1994) Back officing front office functions: Organisational and locational implications of new telemediated services. In: Mansell R (ed) Management of information and communication technologies. Aslib, London
33. Salomon I, Tsairi B (1995) Global production, transport and telecommunications: A case study of coping with barriers in Israeli-Japanese collaboration. Journal of Transport Geography 3: 15-27
34. Telocity (2000) URL: http://www.telocity.com
35. Wheeler D, O'Kelly ME (1999) Network topology and city accessibility of the commercial Internet. Professional Geographer 51: 327-339
36. Zook MA (2000) The web of production: The economic geography of commercial Internet content production in the United States. Environment and Planning A 32: 411-426