Do girls and boys need different electronic books?

Innovations in Education and Teaching International

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 167-180

  Mikk, Jaan ^a   Luik, Piret ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18844443217     PISSN: 14703297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14703290500062565     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alessi, S. M. & Trollip, S. R. (2001) Multimedia for learning; methods and development (3rd edn) (Boston, MA, Allyn and Bacon).
2. Amber, S. W. (2000) User interface design; tips and techniques (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press). Available online at: http://www.ambysoft.com/userInterfaceDesign.pdf (accessed 16 March 2005).
3. Anderson-Inman, L. & Horney, M. (1997) Electronic books for secondary students, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 40(6), 486-491.
4. Anonymous (2000) How to evaluate educational software, Curriculum Review, 39(7), 15.
5. Barker, P. G. (Ed.) (1991) Electronic books, special edition of Educational and Training Technology International, 28(4), 269-368.
6. Berson, M. J. (1996) Effectiveness of computer technology in the social studies: a review of the literature, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(4), 486-499.
7. Boling, E., Beriswill, J. E., Xavier, R., Hebb, C., Kaufman, D. & Frick, T. (1998) Text labels for hypertext navigation buttons, International Journal of Instructional Media, 25(4), 407-421.
8. Caftori, N. (1994) Educational effectiveness of computer software, THE Journal, 22(1), 62-65.
9. Chambliss, M. J. & Calfee, R. C. (1998) Textbooks for learning. Nurturing the children's minds (Maiden, MA, Blackwell Publishers).
10. Chanlin, L.-J. (1999) Gender differences and the need for visual control, International Journal of Instructional Media, 26(3), 329-335.
11. Crozier, J. (1999) Ways to evaluate educational software, Media & Methods, 35(4), 50-51.
12. Durndell, A., Glisson, P. & Siann, G. (1995) Gender and computing: persisting differences, Educational Research, 37(3), 219-227.
13. Graf, D. (1989) Begriffslemen im Biologieunterricht der Sekundarstufe I (Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang).
14. Hood, J. N. & Togo, D. F. (1993/94) Gender effects of graphics presentation, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(2), 176-184.
15. Horney, M.A. & Anderson-Inman, L. (1999) Supported text in electronic reading environments, Reading & Writing Quarterly, 15(2), 127-168.
16. Hughes, I. E. (1998) 'Horses for courses'-categories of computer-based learning programs and their uses in pharmacology courses, Information Services & Use, 18(1/2), 35-44.
17. Kay, R. H. (1992) Understanding gender differences in computer attitudes aptitude, and use: an invitation to build theory, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25(2), 159-171.
18. Keeves, J. P. & Kotte, D. (1998) Sex differences and educational outcomes, in: T. Husen, T. N. Postlethwhite, B. R. Clark & G. Neave (Eds) Education; the complete encyclopaedia 1.1 (CD-ROM) (New York, Elsevier Science).
19. Kliman, M. (1999) Choosing mathematical game Software for Girls and Boys. Available online at: http://www.terc.edu/mathequity/gw/html/ ChoosingSoftwarepaper.html (accessed 11 April 2003).
20. Liao, Y.-K. (1992) Effects of computer-assisted instruction on cognitive outcomes: a meta-analysis, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(3), 367-379.
21. Mayer, R. & Gallini, J. (1990) When is an illustration worth ten thousand words?, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 715-726.
22. Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (2003) Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning, Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
23. McClain, E. J. (1983) Do women resist computers?, in: TV Ontario, The computer academy; home user's guide to microcomputers (Toronto, TV Ontario), 44-50.
24. McCoy, L. P. (1996) Computer-based mathematics learning, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(4), 438-460.
25. McGrathj D. & Thurston, L. P. (1992) Sex differences in computer attitudes and beliefs among rural middle school children after a teacher training intervention, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(4), 468-485.
26. Merzyn, G. (1996) A comparison of some linguistic variables in fifteen science texts, in: G. Welford, J. Osborne & P. Scott (Eds) Research in science education in Europe: current issues and themes (London and Washington DC, The Palmer Press), 361-369.
27. Mikk, J. (2000) Textbook: research and writing (Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang, Europäiser Verlag der Wissenschaften).
28. NAEYC (1996) Technology and young children-ages 3-8. Position Statement (Washington DC, NAEYC). Available online at: http://www.naeyc.org/resources/ position_statements/pstech98.htm (accessed 11 April 2003).
29. Passig, D. & Levin, H. (2000) Gender preferences for multimedia interfaces, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(1), 64-71.
30. Phillips, R. (1997) The developer's handbook to interactive multimedia-a practical guide for educational applications (London, Kogan Page).
31. Rattanapian, V. & Gibbs, W. J. (1995) Computerised drill and practice: design options and learner characteristics, International Journal of Instructional Media, 22(1), 59-77.
32. Reinen, I. J. & Plomp T. (1998) Gender and new technology, in: T. Husen, T. N. Postlethwhite, B. R. Clark & G. Neave (Eds) Education: the complete encyclopaedia 1.1 (CD-ROM) (New York, Elsevier Science).
33. Riding, R. & Grimley, M. (1999) Cognitive style, gender and learning from multi-media materials in 11-year-old children, British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(1), 43-56.
34. Sacks, C. H. & Bellisimo, Y. (1993/94) Attitudes toward computers and computer use: the issue of gender, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(2), 256-269.
35. Sweller, J. (2002) Visualisation and instructional design. Report for Knowledge Media Research Centre, International Workshop on Dynamic Visualisations and Learning, Tübingen, Germany, 17-19 July. Available online at: http://www.iwm-kmrc.de/workshops/visualization/sweller.pdf (accessed 11 April 2003).
36. Teh, G. P. L. & Fraser, B. J. (1995) Gender differences in achievement and attitudes among students using computer-assisted instruction, International Journal of Instructional Media, 22(2), 111-115.
37. Van Dusen, L. M. & Worthen, B. R. (1995) Can integrated instructional technology transform the classroom?, Educational Leadership, 53(2), 28-33.
38. Wang, S. & Sleeman, P. J. (1993) Computer-assisted instruction effectiveness: a brief review of the research, International Journal of Instructional Media, 20(4), 333-348.
39. Young, B. J. (2000) Gender differences in student attitudes toward computers, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 204-216.