Quantification of random genomic mutations

Nature Methods

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 285-290

  Bielas, Jason H ^a   Loeb, Lawrence A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESTRICTION ENDONUCLEASE; URACIL;

ARTICLE; BASE PAIRING; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DILUTION; DNA HYBRIDIZATION; EXON; GENE LOCUS; GENE MUTATION; GENE PROBE; GENE SEQUENCE; GENE TARGETING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INTRON; MAGNETIC SEPARATION; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESTRICTION MAPPING; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHROMOSOME MAP; EVALUATION; FIBROBLAST; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; MAGNETISM; METHODOLOGY; MUTATION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CHROMOSOME MAPPING; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; FIBROBLASTS; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; MAGNETICS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MUTATION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 18744416025     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth751     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bielas, J.H. & Loeb, L.A. Mutator phenotype in cancer: timing and perspectives. Environ. Mol. Mutagen (in the press).
2. Jackson, A.L. & Loeb, L.A. The mutation rate and cancer. Genetics 148, 1483-1490 (1998).
3. Cervantes, R.B., Stringer, J.R., Shao, C., Tischfield, J.A. & Stambrook, P.J. Embryonic stem cells and somatic cells differ in mutation frequency and type. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 3586-3590 (2002).
4. Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R.A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57-70 (2000).
5. Kallioniemi, A. et al. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science 258, 818-821 (1992).
6. Bayani, J. et al. Parallel analysis of sporadic primary ovarian carcinomas by spectral karyotyping, comparative genomic hybridization, and expression microarrays. Cancer. Res. 62, 3466-3476 (2002).
7. Klein, C.A. et al. Comparative genomic hybridization, loss of heterozygosity, and DNA sequence analysis of single cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 4494-4499 (1999).
8. Wang, T.L. et al. Prevalence of somatic alterations in the colorectal cancer cell genome. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 3076-3080 (2002).
9. Futreal, P.A. et al. A census of human cancer genes. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 117-183 (2004).
10. Loeb, L.A., Springgate, C.F. & Battula, N. Errors in DNA replication as a basis of malignant change. Cancer Res. 34, 2311-2321 (1974).
11. Loeb, L.A., Loeb, K.R. & Anderson, J.P. Multiple mutations and cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 776-781 (2003).
12. Patel, P.H. & Loeb, L.A. Multiple amino acid substitutions allow DNA polymerases to synthesize RNA. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 40266-40272 (2000).
13. Bielas, J.H. & Heddle, J.A. Elevated mutagenesis and decreased DNA repair at a transgene are associated with proliferation but not apoptosis in p53-deficient cells. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12853-12858 (2003).
14. Mientjes, E.J. et al. DNA adducts, mutant frequencies, and mutation spectra in various organs of lambda lacZ mice exposed to ethylating agents. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 31, 18-31 (1998).
15. Masumura, K. et al. Spectra of gpt mutations in ethylnitrosourea-treated and untreated transgenic mice. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 34, 1-8 (1999).
16. Graw, J., Pretsch, W. & Loster, J. Mutation in intron 6 of the hamster Mitf gene leads to skipping of the subsequent exon and creates a novel animal model for the human Waardenburg syndrome type II. Genetics 164, 1035-1041 (2003).
17. Rouer, E., Brule, F. & Benarous, R. A single base mutation in the 5′ splice site of intron 7 of the lck gene is responsible for the deletion of exon 7 in lck mRNA of the JCaM1 cell line. Oncogene 18, 4262-4268 (1999).
18. Bielas, J.H. & Heddle, J.A. Quiescent murine cells lack global genomic repair but are proficient in transcription-coupled repair. DNA Repair (Amst.) 3, 711-717 (2004).
19. Bielas, J.H. & Heddle, J.A. Proliferation is necessary for both repair and mutation in transgenic mouse cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11391-11396 (2000).
20. Parsons, B.L. & Heflich, R.H. Genotypic selection methods for the direct analysis of point mutations. Mutat. Res. 387, 97-121 (1997).
21. Parry, J.M., Shamsher, M. & Skibinski, D.O. Restriction site mutation analysis, a proposed methodology for the detection and study of DNA base changes following mutagen exposure. Mutagenesis 5, 209-212 (1990).
22. Steingrimsdottir, H. et al. Development of new molecular procedures for the detection of genetic alterations in man. Mutat. Res. 353, 109-121 (1996).
23. Jenkins, G.J., Suzen, H.S., Sueiro, R.A. & Parry, J.M. The restriction site mutation assay: a review of the methodology development and the current status of the technique. Mutagenesis 14, 439-448 (1999).
24. Hussain, S.P. et al. Increased p53 mutation load in noncancerous colon tissue from ulcerative colitis: a cancer-prone chronic inflammatory disease. Cancer Res. 60, 3333-3337 (2000).
25. Pourzand, C. & Cerutti, P. Genotypic mutation analysis by RFLP/PCR. Mutat. Res. 288, 113-121 (1993).
26. Pourzand, C. & Cerutti, P. Mutagenesis of H-ras codons 11 and 12 in human fibroblasts by N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea. Carcinogenesis 14, 2193-2196 (1993).
27. Makalowski, W. The human genome structure and organization. Acta Biochim. Pol. 48, 587-598 (2001).
28. Lindahl, T. & Wood, R.D. Quality control by DNA repair. Science 286, 1897-1905 (1999).
29. Santos, J.H., Meyer, J.N., Skorvaga, M., Annab, L.A. & Van Houten, B. Mitochondrial hTERT exacerbates free radical-mediated mtDNA damage. Aging Cell 3, 399-411 (2004).
30. Loeb, L.A., Preston, B.D., Snow, E.T. & Schaaper, R.M. Apurinic sites as common intermediates in mutagenesis. Basic Life Sci. 38, 341-347 (1986).