Influences on student cognitions about evaluation

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 81-95

  Ross, John A ^a   Rolheiser, Carol ^a   Hogaboam Gray, Anne ^a  

^a OISE/UT Trent Valley Centre   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842646064     PISSN: 0969594X     EISSN: 1465329X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09695940220119201     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. ANDERMAN, E. M., ANDERMAN, L. H., and GRIESINGER, T., 1999. The relation of present and possible academic selves during early adolescence to grade point average and achievement goals. Elementary School Journal, 100(1): 3–18.
2. ARKSEY, H., and KNIGHT, P., 1999. Interviewing for Social Scientists: an introductory resource with examples, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. ARTER, J., SPANDEL, V., CULHAM, R., and POLLARD, J., The impact of training students to be self-assessors of writing. paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April, New Orleans, LA.
4. BANDURA, A., 1997. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control, New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
5. BANGERT-DROWNS, R., KULIK, J., and KULIK, C., 1991. Effects of frequent classroom testing. Journal of Educational Research, 85(2): 89–99.
6. BLACK, P., and WlLIAM, D., 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1): 7–74.
7. BOL, L., STEPHENSON, P. L., O'CONNELL, A. A., and NUNNERY, J. A., 1998. Influence of experience, grade level, and subject area on teachers' assessment practices. Journal of Educational Research, 91(6): 323–330.
8. BOND, L., 1995. Unintended consequences of performance assessment: issues of bias and fairness. Educational Measurement: issues and practices, 15(4): 21–24.
9. BROADFOOT, P., JAMES, M., MCMEEKING, S., NUTTALL, D., and STIERER, S., 1988. Records of Achievement: report of the National Evaluation of Pilot Schemes (PRAISE), London: HMSO.
10. CAMERON, J., and PIERCE, W., 1994. Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation. Review of Educational Research, 64(3): 363–424.
11. FALL, R., WEBB, N., and WISE, N., Group discussion and large-scale language arts assessment: effects on students' comprehension. paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association. April, San Francisco, CA.
12. GARCIA, G., and PEARSON, P., 1994. “ Assessment and diversity ”. In Review of Research in Education, Edited by: DARLING-HAMMOND, L., Vol. 20, 337–339. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
13. GlPPS, C., 1999. “ Socio-cultural aspects of assessment ”. In Review of Research in Education, Edited by: IRAN-NEJAD, A., and PEARSON, P. D., Vol. 24, 355–392. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
14. GLASER, R., and SILVER, E., 1994. “ Assessment, testing, and instruction: retrospect and prospect ”. In Review of Research in Education, Edited by: DARLING-HAMMOND, L., Vol. 20, 393–419. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
15. GUAY, F., BOIVIN, M., and HODGES, E. V., 1999. Social comparison processes and academic achievement: the dependence of the development of self-evaluations on friends' performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3): 564–568.
16. HERMAN, J. L., KLEIN, D. C., and WAKAI, S. T., 1997. American students' perspectives on alternative assessment: do they know it's different?. Assessment in Education, 4(3): 339–351.
17. KLUGER, A. N., and DENlSI, A., 1996. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119: 254–284.
18. LEPPER, M. R., and HODELL, M., 1989. “ Intrinsic motivation in the classroom ”. In Research on Motivation in Education, Edited by: AMES, C., and AMES, R., Vol. 3, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19. LINCOLN, Y. S., and CUBA, E. G., 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. LOGAN, C., and PARKES, J., Effects of classroom assessment on student motivation. paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April, New Orleans, LA.
21. MARSH, H., CHESSOR, D., CRAVEN, R., and ROCHE, L., 1995. The effects of gifted and talented programmes on academic self-concept: the big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2): 285–319.
22. MILES, M., and HUBBERMAN, A., 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: an expanded source book, 2nd edition, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23. MORGAN, B., Cooperative learning in higher education: undergraduate student reflections on group examinations for group grades. paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April, Montreal, Canada.
24. PARIS, S., LAWTON, T., TURNER, J., and ROTH, J., 1991. A developmental perspective on standardized achievement testing. Educational Researcher, 20(5): 12–20. 40
25. PARIS, S. G., TURNER, J. C., MUCHMORE, J., and PERRY, N., 1995. Teachers' and students' perceptions of portfolios. Journal of Cognitive Education, 5(1): 6–40.
26. ROLHEISER, C., ed. 1996. Self-evaluation: helping students get better at it, Toronto: Visutronx.
27. ROSS, J. A., ROLHEISER, C., and HOGABOAM-GRAY, A., 1998. Skills training versus action research in-service: impact on student attitudes to self-evaluation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(5): 463–477.
28. ROSS, J. A., ROLHEISER, C., and HOGABOAM-GRAY, A., 1999. Effect of self-evaluation on narrative writing. Assessing Writing, 6(1): 107–132.
29. ROSS, J. A., HOGABOAM-GRAY, A., and ROLHEISER, C., Student self-evaluation in Grade 5-6 mathematics: effects on problem solving achievement. paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April, Seattle, WA.
30. SADLER, D. R., 1989. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2): 119–144.
31. SCHUNK, D. H., 1981. Modeling and attributional effects on children's achievement: a self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(1): 93–105.
32. SCHUNK, D. H., 1996. Goal and self-evaluative influences during children's cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2): 359–382.
33. SEALE, C., 1999. The Quality of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. STAKE, R., 1995. The Art of Case Study Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. STIPEK, D., RECCHIA, S., and McCLINTIC, S., 1992. Self-evaluation in young children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57: 1–84.
36. TOPPING, K., 1998. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3): 249–276.
37. TORRANCE, H., and PRYOR, J., 1998. Investigating Formative Assessment: teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom, Buckingham: Open University Press.
38. WEBB, N., CHIZHIK, A., NEMER, K., and SUGRUE, B., Equity issues in collaborative group assessment: group composition and performance. paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April, New York, NY.