The revelation effect for item and associative recognition: Familiarity versus recollection

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 176-183

  Cameron, Terri E ^a   Hockley, William E ^a  

^a WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; RECALL; RECOGNITION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0034090578     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03213797     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. BAIN, J. D., & HUMPHREYS, M. S. (1988). Relational context: Independent cues, meanings, and configurations. In G. Davis & D. M. Thomson (Eds.), Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 97-137). London: Wiley.
2. CAMERON, T. E. (1998). The revelation effect for item versus associative recognition. Unpublished honors thesis, Wilfrid Laurier University.
3. CLARK, S. E. (1992). Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition. Memory & Cognition, 20, 231-243.
4. CLARK, S. E., & BURCHETT, R. E. R. (1994). Word frequency and list composition effects in associative recognition and recall. Memory & Cognition, 22, 55-62.
5. CLARK, S. E., & GRONLUND, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37-60.
6. CLARK, S. E., & HORI, A. (1995). List length and overlap effects in forced-choice associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 23, 456-461.
7. CLARK, S. E., HORI, A., & CALLAN, D. E. (1993). Forced-choice associative recognition: Implications for global-matching models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 871-881.
8. CLARK, S. E., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1992). Cuing effects and associative information in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 20, 580-598.
9. DONALDSON, W. (1993). Accuracy of d′ and A′ as estimates of sensitivity. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 271-274.
10. FRIGO, L. C., REAS, D. L., & LECOMPTE, D. C. (1999). Revelation without presentation: Counterfeit study list yields robust revelation effect. Memory & Cognition. 27, 339-343.
11. GIBSON, J. M., & WATKINS, M. J. (1988). A pool of 1,086 words with unique two-letter fragments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 390-397.
12. GILLUND, G., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
13. HICKS, J. L., & MARSH, R. L. (1998). A decrement-to-familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1105-1120.
14. HINTZMAN, D. L. (1988) Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace model. Psychological Review., 95, 528-551.
15. HOCKLEY, W. E. (1994). Reflections of the mirror effect for item and associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 22, 713-722.
16. HOCKLEY, W. E., & CONSOLI, A. (1999). Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 27, 657-664.
17. HOCKLEY, W. E., & CRISTI, C. (1996). Tests of encoding tradeoffs between item and associative information. Memory & Cognition, 24, 202-216.
18. HUMPHREYS, M. S. (1978). Item and relational information. A case for context independent retrieval. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 17, 175-188.
19. LECOMPTE, D. C. (1995). Recollective experience in the revelation effect: Separating the contributions of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 23, 324-334.
20. LUO, C. R. (1993). Enhanced feeling of recognition: Effects of identifying and manipulating test items on recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 405-413.
21. MAY, R. B., & SANDE, G. N. (1982). Encoding expectancies and word frequency in recall and recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 95, 485-495.
22. MURDOCK, B. B. (1993). TODAM2: A model for storage and retrieval of item, associative, and serial-order information. Psychological Review, 100, 183-203.
23. PAIVIO, A., YUILLE, J. C., & MADIGAN, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 76 (1, Pt. 2), 1-25.
24. PEYNIRCIOǦLU, Z. F., & TEKCAN, A. (1993). Revelation effect: Effort or priming does not creale the sense of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 382-388.
25. PEYNIRCIOǦLU, Z. F., & WATKINS, M. J. (1988). Effect of unfolding stimulus presentation on recognition memory. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 2, pp. 518-523). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
26. ROTELLO, C. M., & HEIT, E. (in press). Associative recognition: A case of recall-to-reject processing. Journal of Memory & Language.
27. WATKINS, M. J., & PEYNIRCIOǦLU, Z. F. (1990). The revelation effect: When disguising test items induces recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 1012-1020.
28. WESTERMAN, D. L., & GREENE, R. L. (1996). On the generality of the revelation effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1147-1153.
29. WESTERMAN, D. L., & GREENE, R. L. (1998). The revelation that the revelation effect is not due to revelation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 377-386.
30. YONELINAS, A. P. (1997) Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 25, 747-763.