Optimization of osmotic dehydration of cantaloupe using desired function methodology

Journal of Food Engineering

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 213-219

  Corzo, Otoniel ^a   Gomez, Eddie R ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE ORIENTE   (Venezuela)

Author keywords

Cantaloupe; Desired function; Optimization; Osmotic dehydration

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC HUMIDITY; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); FUNCTION EVALUATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; OSMOSIS; THERMAL EFFECTS;

CANTALOUPE; DESIRED FUNCTION; OSMOTIC DEHYDRATION;

DEHYDRATION;

CUCUMIS MELO;

EID: 1842584886     PISSN: 02608774     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2003.09.035     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. AOAC (1990). Official methods of analysis (15th ed.). Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
2. Derringer G.C. Balancing act: Optimizing a product's properties. Quality Progress. 26(6):1994;51-58.
3. Derringer G.C., Suich R. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. Journal of Quality Technology. 12(10):1980;214-219.
4. Dixon G.M., Jen J. Changes of sugar and acid in osmovac dried apple slices. Journal of Food Science. 42:1977;1126-1131.
5. Draper N.R., Lin D. Small response-surface designs. Technometrics. 32(2):1990;187-194.
6. Fichtati J., Van De Voort F.R., Khury A.I. Multiresponse optimization of acid casein production. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 12(4):1990;247-258.
7. Fito P. Modeling of vacuum osmotic dehydration of food. Journal of Food Engineering. 22:1994;313-328.
8. Floros J., Chinnan M. Seven factor response surface optimization of a double-stage lye (NaOH) peeling process of pimiento peppers. Journal of Food Science. 53:1988;631-638.
9. Garrote R., Coutaz V., Luna J., Silva E., Bertone R. Optimizing processing conditions of chemical peeling of potatoes using response surface methodology. Journal of Food Science. 58:1993;821-826.
10. Giangiacomo R., Torreggiani D., Abbo E. Osmotic dehydration of fruit. Part I: Sugar exchange between fruit and extracting syrup. Journal of Food Process Preservation. 11:1987;183-195.
11. Guillou A.A., Floros J. Multiresponse optimization minimizes salt in natural cucumber fermentation and storage. Journal of Food Science. 56:1993;1381-1389.
12. Gurmail S., Mudahar R., Toledo T., Joseph J. A response surface methodology approach to optimize potato dehydration process. Journal of Food Process Preservation. 14:1990;93-106.
13. Harrington E.C. The desirability function. Industrial Quality Control. 21(9):1965;494-498.
14. Harrington E.C. The experimental design for quadratic response surfaces. Biometrics. 15(2):1965;611-624.
15. Lawson J., Madrigal J.L., Erjavec J. Estrategias experimentales para el mejoramiento de la calidad en la industria. Primera edición:1992;Grupo Editorial Iberoamérica, México.
16. Lerici C.L., Pinnavaia G., Dalla Rosa M., Bartolucci L. Osmotic dehydration of fruit: Influence of osmotic agents on drying behavior and product quality. Journal of Food Science. 50:1985;1217-1219.
17. Mettler E., Seibel W. Effects of emulsifiers and hydrocolloids on whole wheat bread quality: A response surface methodology study. Cereal Chemistry. 70(4):1993;373-377.
18. Myers R.H. Response surface methodology. 1971;Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
19. Myers R.H., Montgomery D.C. Response surface methodology. Process and product optimization using designed experiments. 2002;John Wiley & Sons, New York.
20. Nelder J.A. The selection of terms in response-surface models. How strong is the weak-heredity principle. The American Statistician. 52(4):1998;97-102.
21. Peixoto J. A property of well-formulated polynomial regression models. The American Statistician. 44(1):1990;52-60.
22. Raoult-Wack A.L. Advances in osmotic dehydration. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 5:1994;255-260.
23. Raoult A.L., Lafont F., Rios G., Guilbert S. Osmotic dehydration: Study of mass transfer in terms of engineering properties. Mujjumdar A.S., Roques M. Drying '89. 1989;487-495 Hemisphere.
24. Rastogi N.K., Niranjan K. Enhanced mass transfer during osmotic dehydration of high pressure treated pineapple. Journal of Food Science. 63:1998;508-511.
25. Rastogi N.K., Raghavarao K.S.M.S. Water and solute diffusión coefficients of carrot as a function of temperature and concentration. Journal of Food Engineering. 34:1997;429-440.
26. Rastogi N.K., Eshtisghi M.N., Knorr D. Accelerated mass transfer during osmotic dehydration of high intensity electrical field pulse pretreated carrots. Journal of Food Science. 64:1999;1020-1023.
27. Rastogi N.K., Raghavarao K.S., Niranjan K. Mass transfer during osmotic dehydration of banana: Fickian diffusion in cylindrical configuration. Journal of Food Engineering. 31:1997;423-432.
28. Simal S., Benedito J., Sánchez E.S., Rosello C. Use of ultrasound to increase mass transport rate during osmotic dehydration. Journal of Food Engineering. 36:1998;323-336.
29. Sundaram R.A. First course in optimization theory. 1996;Cambridge University Press, London.
30. Torreggiani D. Osmotic dehydration in fruit and vegetables. Process and Food International. 26(3):1993;59-68.
31. Wanasundara P.K.J.P.D., Amarowicz R.A., Pegg R.B., Shand P.J. Preparation and characterization of hydrolyzed proteins from defibrinated bovine plasma. Journal of Food Science. 67:2002;623-630.
32. Ylimaki G., Hawrysh R.T., Thomson A.B.R. Application of response surface methodology to the development of rice flour yeast breads: Objective measurements. Journal of Food Science. 53:1988;1800-1805.