Human reactions to technological failure: How accidents rooted in technology vs. human error influence judgments of organizational accountability

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 129-141

  Naquin, Charles E ^a   Kurtzberg, Terry R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Counterfactual thinking; Fairness theory; Organizational accountability; Technology failure

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842584475     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Allen, T. (1977). Managing the flow of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Barley, S. R. (1996). The new world of work. London: British-North American Committee.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Beniger, J. (1989). The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the Information Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Branscombe, N. R., Owen, S., Garstka, T., & Coleman, J. S. (1996). Rape and accident counterfactuals: Who might have done otherwise and would it have changed the outcome? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1042-1067.
6. Caporael, L. R. (1986). Anthropomorphism and mechanomorphism: Two faces of the human machine. Computers in Human Behavior, 2, 215-234.
7. Carnevale, A. P. (1991). America and the new economy: How new competitive standards are radically changing american workplaces. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
8. Chu, H. (2000a). Singapore Airlines offers families of crash fatalities $400,000 each. Los Angeles Times, p. 11.
9. Chu, H. (2000b). Taiwan crash investigators examine recorded data: The location of the wreckage leads experts to question whether the pilot might have used the wrong runway. Los Angeles Times, p. 4.
10. Creyer, E. H., & Gurhan, Z. (1997). Who's to blame. Counterfactual reasoning and the assignment of blame. Psychology and Marketing, 13(3), 209-222.
11. Cross, R. (2001). A relational view of information seeking: Tapping people and inanimate sources in intentional search. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Washington, DC.
12. Davis, C. G., Lehman, D. R., Silver, R. C., & Wortman, C. B. (1996). Self-blame following a traumatic event: The role of perceived avoidability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 557-567.
13. Delfabbro, P. H., & Winefield, A. H. (2000). Predictors of irrational thinking in regular slot machine gamblers. Journal of Psychology, 134, 117-128.
14. Drucker, P. F. (1992). The new society of organizations. Harvard, Business Review, September-October, 95-104.
15. Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1986). Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 3-19.
16. Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 1-55). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17. Galinsky, A. D., Seiden, V. L., Kim, P. H., & Medvec, V. H. (2002). The dissatisfaction of having your first offer accepted: The role of counterfactual thinking in negotiations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 271-283.
18. Ginzel, L. E., Kramer, R. M., & Sutton, R. I. (1993). Organizational impression management as a reciprocal influence process: The neglected role of the organizational audience. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 15, pp. 227-266). Greenwich, CT: JAP Press.
19. Goldberg, L. (2000). Continental faces lawsuit by Air France over crash. Houston Chronicle, 1.
20. Greenberg, J.& Cropanzano, R. (Eds.). (2001). Advances in organizational justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21. Guthrie, S. E. (1997). Anthropomorphism: A definition and history. In R. W. Mitchell & N. S. Thompson (Eds.), Anthropomorphism, anecdotes, and animals: SUNY series in philosophy and biology (pp. 50-58). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
22. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
23. Hilton, D. J., & Slugoski, B. R. (1986). Knowledge-based causal attribution: The abnormal conditions focus model. Psychological Review, 93, 75-88.
24. Huey, J. (1994). Waking up to the new economy. Fortune, 36-46.
25. Jervis, R. (1996). Counterfactuals, causation, and complexity. In P. E. Tetlock & A. Belkin (Eds.), Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics (pp. 309-316). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
27. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201-208). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, (4th ed., pp. 233-265).
29. Lacey, R. O., Medvec, V. H., Messick, D. M. (2003). Blame and prevention processing goals as sources of bias in causal explanations of accidents. Unpublished manuscript.
30. Lipe, M. G. (1991). Counterfactual reasoning as a framework for attribution theories. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 456-471.
31. Macrae, C. N. (1992). A tale of two curries: Counterfactual thinking and accident-related judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 84-87.
32. Macrae, C. N., Milne, A. B., & Griffiths, R. J. (1993). Counterfactual thinking and the perception of criminal behaviour. British Journal of Psychology, 84, 221-226.
33. Mandel, D. R., & Lehman, D. R. (1996). Counterfactual thinking and ascriptions of cause and preventability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 450-463.
34. Markman, K. D., Gavanski, I., Sherman, S. J., & McMullen, M. N. (1993). The mental simulation of better and worse possible worlds. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 87-109.
35. Markman, K. D., Gavanski, I., Sherman, S. J., & McMullen, M. N. (1995). The impact of perceived control on the imagination of better and worse possible worlds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 588-595.
36. Markman, K. D., & Tetlock, P. E. (2000). Accountability and close-call counterfactuals: The loser who nearly won and the winner who nearly lost. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1213-1224.
37. McGill, A. L. (1993). Selection of a causal background: Role of expectation versus feature mutability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 701-707.
38. McGill, A. L. (1995). American and Thai managers explanations for poor company performance: Role of perspective and culture in causal selection. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 1-12.
39. McGill, A. L. (2000). Counterfactual reasoningin causal judgments: Implications for marketing. Psychology and Marketing, 17, 281-298.
40. McGill, A. L., & Klein, J. G. (1993). Contrastive and counterfactual thinking in causal judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 897-905.
41. Morris, M. W., Moore, P. C., & Sim, D. L. H. (1999). Choosing remedies after accidents: Counterfactual thoughts and the focus on fixing human error. Psychological Bulletin and Review, 6, 579-585.
42. Nario, M. R., & Branscombe, N. R. (1995). Comparison processes in hindsight and causal attribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1244-1255.
43. Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 81-103.
44. Nevala, A., Rivedal, K., Grossman, R. (2001). 141 injured as 'L' rams a 2nd train. Chicago Tribune, 1, 18.
45. Peterson, C., Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. (1993). Learned helplessness: A theory for the age of personal control. New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Price, M. E., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2002). Punitive sentiment as an anti-free rider psychological device: Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 203-231.
47. Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparitive method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
48. Roese, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133-148.
49. Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1993). The structure of counterfactual thought. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 312-319.
50. Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1995). Counterfactual thinking: A critical overview. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 1-55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Roese, N. L, & Olson, J. M. (1996). Counterfactuals, causal attributions, and the hindsight bias: A conceptual integration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 197-227.
52. Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1997). Counterfactual thinking: The intersection of affect and function. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 1-59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
53. Rosenbaum, R. M. (1972). A dimensional analysis of the perceived causes of success and failure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
54. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-28.
55. Sanna, L. J., & Turley, K. J. (1996). Antecedents to spontaneous counterfactual thinking: Effect of expectancy violation and outcome valence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 906-919.
56. Sanna, L. J., & Turley-Ames, K. J. (2000). Counterfactual intensity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 273-296.
57. Scheibe, K. E., & Erwin, M. (1979). The computer as alter. Journal of Social Psychology, 108, 103-109.
58. Schlenker, B. R. (1997). Personal responsibility: Applications of the triangle model. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 19, pp. 241-301). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
59. Schlenker, B. R., Britt, T. W., Pennington, J. W., Murphy, R., & Doberty, K. J. (1994). The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review, 101, 632-652.
60. Seelau, E. P., Seelau, S. M., Wells, G. L., & Windschitl, P. D. (1995). Counterfactual constraints. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 57-79). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Spellman, B. A., & Mandel, D. R. (1999). When possibility informs reality: Counterfactual thinking as a cue to causality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 120-123.
62. Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 67-85.
63. Walster, E., Walster, C. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and Research.
64. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.
65. Wells, G. L., & Gavanski, I. (1989). Mental simulation of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 161-169.
66. Williams, C. W., Lees-Haley, P. R., & Price, J. R. (1996). The role of counterfactual thinking and causal attribution in accident-related judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 2100-2112.