Choosing remedies after accidents: Counterfactual thoughts and the focus on fixing "human error"

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 579-585

  Morris, Michael W ^a,b   Moore, Paul C ^a   Sim, Damien L H ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DECISION THEORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORGANIZATION; THINKING;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DECISION THEORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; THINKING;

EID: 0033251711     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03212966     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. CARROLL, J. (1995). Incident reviews in high-hazard industries: Sense making and learning. Industrial & Environmental Crisis Quarterly, 9, 175-198.
2. DÖRNER, D. (1997). The logic of failure: Recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. GILBERT, D. T., & MALONE, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38.
4. GIROTTO, V., LEGRENZI, P., & RIZZO, A. (1991). Event controllability in counterfactual thinking. Acta Psychologica, 78, 111-133.
5. GLADWELL, M. (1996, January 22). Blowup. The New Yorker, pp. 32-36.
6. JERVIS, R. (1996). Counterfactuals, causation, and complexity. In P. E. Tetlock & A. Belkin (Eds.), Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics (pp. 309-316). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
7. KAHNEMAN, D., & MILLER, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
8. KAHNEMAN, D., & TVERSKY, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201-208). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. KELLEY, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 192-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
10. MARCH, J. G. (1994). A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York: Macmillan.
11. MARCH, J. G., & SIMON, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
12. MARCH, J. G., SPROULL, L. S., & TAMUZ, M. (1991). Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organizational Science, 2, 1-13.
13. MCGILL, A. L. (1989). Context effects in judgments of causation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 5, 189-200.
14. MOORE, P. C., & THOMSEN, J. (1996). Reliving the past through computational simulation: Testing the accuracy of organizational counterfactual thinking. Unpublished manuscript.
15. MORRIS, M. W., & MOORE, P. C. (1998). Learning from a brush with danger: Evidence that pilot learning from dangerous incidents is enabled by counterfactual thinking and hindered by organizational accountability (Research Paper No. 1492). Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
16. MORRIS, M. W., SIM, D. L. H., & MOORE, P. C. (1999). Erroneous "if only" thoughts: Heuristics of counterfactual thinking lead to errors in diagnosing accidents. Unpublished manuscript.
17. NATIONAL TRAFFIC SAFETY BOARD (1990). Annual review of aircraft accident data. U.S. air carrier operations calendar year 1987 (Report No. NTSB/ARC-90/01, Government Accession No. PB 91/119693). Washington, DC: Author.
18. NORMAN, D. A. (1990, April 11). Cognitive science in the cockpit. Paper presented at the Aerospace Human Factors Symposium, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffet Field, CA.
19. NORMAN, D. A. (1992). Turn signals are the facial expressions of automobiles. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20. PERROW, C. (1981). Normal accident at Three Mile Island. Society, 18(5), 17-26.
21. PERROW, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high risk systems. New York: Basic Books.
22. REASON, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. ROESE, N. J. (1994). The functional basis of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 66, 805-818.
24. ROESE, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133-148.
25. ROESE, N. J., & OLSON, J. M. (1995). Functions of counterfactual thinking. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 169-197). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. SHERMAN, S. J., & MCCONNELL, A. R. (1995). Dysfunctional implications of counterfactual thinking: When alternatives to reality fail us. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 199-231). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. SIM, D. L. H., & MORRIS, M. W. (1998). Representativeness in counterfactual thinking: The principle that antecedent and outcome correspond in magnitude. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 595-609.
28. SPECTER, M. (1997, August 20). Jeers sting Mir mission control which bemoans a money pinch. The New York Times, p. A1.
29. TETLOCK, P. E. (1998). Close-call counterfactuals and belief-system defenses: I was not almost wrong but I was almost right. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75, 3, 639-652.
30. VAUGHAN, D. (1996). The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31. WELLS, G. L., TAYLOR, B. R., & TURTLE, J. W. (1987). The undoing of scenarios. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 53, 421-430.