Accountability and close-call counterfactuals: The loser who nearly won and the winner who nearly lost

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2000, Pages 1213-1224

  Markman, Keith D ^a   Tetlock, Philip E ^b  

^a OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034340232     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167200262004     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.
2. Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk costs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 35, 124-140.
3. Baron, J., & Hershey, J. C. (1988). Outcome bias in decision evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 569-579.
4. Boles, T. L., & Messick, D. M. (1995). A reverse outcome bias: The influence of multiple reference points on the evaluation of outcomes and decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 262-275.
5. Brockner, J., & Rubin, J. Z. (1985). Entrapment in escalating conflicts: A social psychological analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
6. Büünk, B. P., Collins, R. L., Taylor, S. E., VanYperen, N. W., & Dakof, G. A. (1990). The affective consequences of social comparison: Either direction has its ups and downs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1238-1249.
7. Gleicher, F., Kost, K. A., Baker, S. M., Strathman, A. J., Richman, S. A., & Sherman, S. J. (1990). The role of counterfactual thinking in judgments of affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 284-295.
8. Hare, A. P. (1976). Handbook of small group research (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
9. Johnson, J. T. (1986). The knowledge of what might have been: Affective and attributional consequences of near outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 51-62.
10. Jones, E. E., & Wortman, C. (1973). Ingratiation: An attributional approach. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
11. Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
12. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201-208). NewYork: Cambridge University Press.
13. Kahneman, D., & Varey, C. A. (1990). Propensities and counterfactuals: The loser that almost won. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1101-1110.
14. Markman, K. D., Gavanski, I., Sherman, S. J., & McMullen, M. N. (1998). The mental simulation of better and worse possible worlds. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 87-109.
15. Markman, K. D., Gavanski, I., Sherman, S. J., & McMullen, M. N. (1995). The impact of perceived control on the imagination of better and worse possible worlds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 588-595.
16. McMullen, M. N. (1997). Affective contrast and assimilation in counterfactual thinking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 77-100.
17. McMullen, M. N., & Markman, K. D. (2000). Downward counterfactuals and motivation: The "wake-up call" and the "Pangloss Effect." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 575-584.
18. McMuUen, M. N., Markman, K. D. ,& Gavanski, I. (1995). Livingin neither the best nor worst of all possible worlds: Antecedents and consequences of upward and downward counterfactual thinking. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 133-167). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Medvec, V. H., Madey, S. F., & Gilovich, T. (1995). When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic athletes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 603-610.
20. Medvec, V. H., & Savitsky, K. K. (1997). When doing better means feeling worse: A model of counterfactual cutoff points. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1284-1296.
21. Meyers-Levy, J., & Maheswaran, D. (1992). When timing matters: The influence of temporal distance on consumers' affective and persuasive responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 424-433.
22. Miller, D. T., Tumbull, W., & McFarland, C. (1990). Counterfactual thinking and social perception: Thinking about what might have been. In M. P. Zanria (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 305-331). New York: Academic Press.
23. Pham, L. B., & Taylor, S. E. (1999). From thought to action: Effects of process-versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 250-260.
24. Roese, N. J. (1994). The functional basis of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 805-818.
25. Roese, N.J., & Hur, T. (1997). Affective determinants of counterfactual thinking. Social Cognition, 15, 274-290.
26. Roese, N.J., & Olson, J. M. (1995). Counterfactual thinking: A critical overview. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 1-59). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Roese, N. J., & Olson ,J. M. (1996). Counterfactuals, causal attributions, and the hindsight bias: A conceptual integration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 197-227.
28. Sanna, L. J. (1996). Defensive pessimism, optimism, and simulating alternatives: Some ups and downs of prefactual and counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1020-1036.
29. Sanna, L. J., & Turley, K. J. (1996). Antecedents to spontaneous counterfactual thinking: Effects of expectancy violation and outcome valence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 906-919.
30. Schlenker, B. R. (1982). Translating actions into attitudes: An identity-analytic approach to the explanation of social conduct. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 194-248). New York: Academic Press.
31. Schlenker, B. R. (1985). The self and social life. New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1992). Constructing reality and its alternatives: An inclusion/exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 217-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Sherif, M., & Cantril, H. (1947). The psychology of ego-involvements. New York: John Wiley.
34. Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35. Sherman, S. J., & McConnell, A. R. (1995). Dysfunctional implications of counterfactual thinking. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 199-231). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Siegel-Jacobs, K., & Yates, J. F. (1996). Effects of procedural and outcome accountability on judgment quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 1-17.
37. Simonson, I., & Staw, B. M. (1992). Deescalation strategies: A comparison of techniques for reducing commitment to losing courses of action. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 419-426.
38. Stapel, D. A., Koomen, W., & Zeelenberg, M. (1998). The impact of accuracy motivation on interpretation, comparison, and correction processes: Accuracy × Knowledge Accessibility effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 878-893.
39. Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 27-44.
40. Staw, B. M. (1980). Rationality and justification in everyday life. In B. M. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 2). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
41. Strack, F., Schwarz, N., & Gschneidinger, E. (1985). Happiness and reminiscing: The role of time perspective, affect, and mode of thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1460-1469.
42. Tetlock, P. E. (1983a). Accountability and the complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 74-83.
43. Tetlock, P. E. (1983b). Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 285-292.
44. Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 297-332). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
45. Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 331-376). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
46. Tetlock, P. E., & Kim, J. (1987). Accountability and overconfidence in a personality prediction task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 700-709.
47. Tetlock, P. E., Skitka, L., & Boettger, R. (1989). Social and cognitive strategies of dealing with accountability: Conformity, complexity, and bolstering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 632-641.
48. Wegener, D. T. & Petty, R. E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 141-208). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.