Comparison of Low Shear, High Shear, and Fluid Bed Granulation during Low Dose Tablet Process Development

Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 259-266

  Hausman, Debra S ^a  

^a PROCTER AND GAMBLE PHARMACEUTICALS   (United States)

Author keywords

Extragranular microcrystalline cellulose; Fluid bed granulation; High shear; Low shear

Indexed keywords

CROSPOVIDONE; LACTOSE; MAGNESIUM STEARATE; METHANOL; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; POVIDONE; WATER;

ARTICLE; DENSITY; DRUG FORMULATION; DRUG GRANULATION; DRUG SOLUBILITY; HARDNESS; IMPELLER; LOW DRUG DOSE; PARTICLE SIZE; SHEAR RATE; TABLET; THICKNESS; TIMED DRUG RELEASE; WEIGHT;

CELLULOSE; CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; DRUG COMPOUNDING; EXCIPIENTS; PARTICLE SIZE; POWDERS; SHEAR STRENGTH; SOLUBILITY; TABLETS;

EID: 1842559833     PISSN: 03639045     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/DDC-120030419     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Parikh, D. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Granulation Technology; Drugs and the Pharmaceutical Sciences, Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, 1997; Vol. 81.
2. Lieberman, H.; Lachman, L.; Schwartz, J. Granulation technology and tablet compression. In Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms Tablets, 2nd Ed.; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, 1990; Vol. 2, 245-316.
3. Schaefer, H.; Bak, H.; Jaegerskou, A.; Kristensen, A.; Svensson, J.; Holm, P.; Kristensen, H. Granulation in different types of high speed mixers part 2: comparisons between mixers. Pharm. Ind. 1987, 49 (3), 297-304.
4. Schaefer, T.; Holm, P.; Kristensen, H. Comparison between granule growth in a horizontal and a vertical high speed mixer II. Granulation of lactose. Arch. Pharm. Chemi, Sci. Ed. 1986, 14 (1), 17-29.
5. Schaefer, T.; Holm, P.; Kristensen, H. Comparison between granule growth in a horizontal and a vertical high speed mixer II. Granulation of dicalcium phosphate. Arch. Pharm. Chemi, Sci. Ed. 1986, 14 (1), 1-16.
6. Ganderton, D.; Hunter, B. A comparison of granules prepared by pan granulation and by massing and screening. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1971, 23, 1S-10S.
7. Shiromani, P.; Clair, J. Statistical comparison of high-shear versus low-shear granulation using a common formulation. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2000, 26 (3), 357-364.
8. Visavarungroj, N.; Remon, J. Crosslinked starch as binding agent III. Granulation of an insoluble filler. Int. J. Pharm. 1991, 69, 43-51.
9. Sheskey, P.; Williams, D. Comparison of low-shear and high-shear wet granulation techniques and the influence of percent water addition in the preparation of a controlled-release matrix tablet containing HPMC and a high-dose, highly water-soluble drug. Pharm. Technol. 1996, 20 (3), 80-92.
10. Chen, C.; Alli, D.; Igga, M.; Czeisler, J. Comparison of moisture-activated dry granulation process with conventional granulation methods for sematilide hydrochloride tablets. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1990, 16 (3), 379-394.
11. Railkar, A.; Schwartz, J. Evaluation and comparison of a moist granulation technique to conventional methods. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2000, 26 (8), 885-889.
12. Viana, M.; Caramigeas, E.; Vachon, M.; N'Dri, B.; Chulia, D. Effect of formulation excipients and the manufacturing process for solid dosage form on the initial dissolution of theophylline. STP Pharma Sci. 2000, 10 (5), 363-371.
13. Gao, J.; Jain, A.; Motheram, R.; Gray, D.; Hussain, M. Fluid bed granulation of a poorly water soluble, low density, micronized drug: comparison with high shear granulation. Int. J. Pharm. 2002, 237, 1-14.
14. Li, J.; Rekhi, G.; Augsburger, L.; Shangraw, R. The role of intra- and extragranular microcrystalline cellulose in tablet dissolution. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 1996, 1 (4), 343-355.