Problematic issues of cladistics: 1. Ancestor recognition and phylogenetic classification

Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie - Abhandlungen

Volumn 230, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 97-143

  Reif, Wolf Ernst ^a  

^a Institut fur Geowissenschaften   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; CLASSIFICATION; FOSSIL RECORD; PHYLOGENETICS;

EID: 1842502644     PISSN: 00777749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (135)

1. ANGIELCZYK, K. (2002): A character-based method for measuring the fit of a cladogram to the fossil record. - Syst. Biol., 51: 176-191.
2. AX, P. (1984): Das Phylogenetische System. Systematisierung der lebenden Natur aufgrund ihrer Phylogenese. - 349 pp.; Stuttgart (Gustav Fischer).
3. AX, P. (1987): The Phylogenetic System. The Systematization of Organisms on the Basis of their Phylogeny. - 349 pp.; Chichester (Wiley and Sons).
4. AX, P. (1988): Systematik in der Biologie. - 181 pp.; Stuttgart (Gustav Fischer).
5. BEATTY, J. (1982): Classes and cladists. - Syst. Zool., 31: 25-34.
6. BENTON, M. J. (2000). Stems, nodes, crown clades, and rank-free lists: is Linnaeus dead? - Biol. Rev., 75: 633-648.
7. BONDE, N. (1977): Cladistic classification as applied to vertebrates. - In: HECHT, M. K., GOODY, P. C. & HECHT, B. M. (Eds.): Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution: 741-804; New York (Plenum Press).
8. BROWER, A. V. Z. (2000): Evolution is not a necessary assumption of cladistics. - Cladistics, 16: 143-154.
9. CARLSON, S. J. (1999): Phylogenetic systematics and paleontology. - In: HARPER, D. A. T. (Ed.): Numerical Paleobiology: 41-91; Sussex (Wiley).
10. CARTMILL, M. (1981): Hypothesis testing and phylogenetic reconstruction. - Z. zool. Syst. Evol.-Forsch., 19: 73-96.
11. CLYDE, W. C. & FISHER, D. C. (1987): Comparing the fit of stratigraphic and morphologic data in phylogenetic analysis. - Paleobiology, 23: 1-19.
12. CRACRAFT, J. (1974): Phylogenetic models and classification. - Syst. Zool, 23: 71-90.
13. CRACRAFT, J. (1979): Phylogenetic analysis, evolutionary model, and paleontology. - In: CRACRAFT, J. & ELDREDGE, N. (Eds.): Phylogenetic Analysis and Paleontology: 7-40; New York (Columbia Univ. Press).
14. CRAW, R. (1992): Margins of cladistics: identity, difference and place in the emergence of phylogenetic systematics. - In: GRIFFITHS, P. (Ed.): Trees of Life: 65-110; Dordrecht (Kluwer).
15. CROWSON, R. A. (1970): Classification and Biology. - 350 pp.; London (Academic Press).
16. CROWSON, R. A. (1982): Computers versus imagination in the reconstruction of phylogeny. - In: JOYSEY, K. A. & FRIDAY, A. E. (Eds.): Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction: 245-256; London (Academic Press).
17. CUNNINGHAM, C. W. (1999): Some limitations of ancestral-state reconstruction when testing evolutionary hypotheses. - Syst. Biol., 48: 665-674.
18. DONOGHUE, M. J., DOYLE, J. A., GAUTHIER, J., KLUGE, A. G. & ROWE, T. (1989): The importance of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction. - Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 20: 431-460.
19. DUNCAN, T. & STUESSY, T. F. (Eds., 1984): Cladistics: Perspectives on the Reconstruction of Evolutionary History. - 315 pp.; New York (Columbia).
20. ENGELMANN, G. F. & WILEY, E. O. (1977): The place of ancestor-descendant relationships in phylogeny reconstruction. - Syst. Zool., 26: 1-11.
21. ERESHEFSKY, M. (1994): Some problems with the Linnean hierarchy. - Phil. Sci., 61: 186-205.
22. ERESHEFSKY, M. (2001): The Poverty of the Linnean Hierarchy. A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. - 316 pp.; Cambridge (Univ. Press).
23. ESTES, R., QUEIROZ, K. DE, & GAUTHIER, J. (1988): Phylogenetic relationships within Squamata. - In: ESTES, R. & PREGILL, G. K. (Eds.): Phylogenetic Relationships of the Lizard Families. Essays Comemorating Charles L. Camp: 119-281; Stanford (Univ. Press).
24. FARRIS, J. S. (1976): Phylogenetic classification of fossils with Recent species. - Syst. Zool. 25: 271-282.
25. FISHER, D. C. (1980): The role of stratigraphic data in phylogenetic inference. - Geol. Soc. Amer., Abstr. with Progr., 127: 426.
26. FISHER, D. C. (1991): Phylogenetic analysis and its application in evolutionary paleobiology. - In: GILINSKY, N. L. et al. (Eds.): Analytical Paleobiology, Short Courses in Paleontology, 4: 103-122.
27. FISHER, D. C. (1992): Stratigraphic parsimony. - In: MADDISON, W P. & MADDISON, D. R. (Eds.): MacClade, Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution: 124-129; Sunderland, MA (Sinauer).
28. FISHER, D. C. (1994). Stratocladistics: Morphological and temporal patterns and their relation to phylogenetic process. - In: GRANDE, L. & RIEPPEL, O. (Eds.): Interpreting the Hierarchy of Nature: 133-171; New York (Acad. Press).
29. FOOTE, M. (1996): On the probabiliy of ancestors in the fossil record. - Paleobiology, 22: 141-151.
30. FOREY, P. L. (1982): Neontological analysis versus paleontological stories. - In: JOYSEY, K. A. & FRIDAY, A. E. (Eds.): Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction: 119-158; London (Acad. Press).
31. FOREY, P. L. (2001a): What's all this fuss about PhyloCode? - Pal. Ass. Newsl., 47: 19-47.
32. FOREY, P. L. (2001b): Cladistics. - In: BRIGGS, D. F. G. & CROWTHER, P. R. (Eds.): Paleobiology II: 430-434; Oxford (Blackwell).
33. FORTEY, R. A. & JEFFERIES, R. P. S. (1982): Fossils and phylogeny - a compromise approach. - In: JOYSEY, K. A. & FRIDAY, A. E. (Eds.): Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction: 197-234; London (Acad. Press).
34. GAFFNEY, E. S. (1979): An introducton to the logic of phylogeny reconstruction. - In: CRACRAFT, J. & ELDREDGE, N. (Eds.): Phylogenetic Analysis and Paleontology: 79-111; New York (Columbia).
35. GAUTHIER, J., CANATELLA, D. QUEIROZ, K. DE, KLUGE, A. G. & ROWE, T. (1989): Tetrapod phylogeny. - In: FERNHOM, B., BREMER, K. & JÖRNVALL, H. (Eds.): The Hierarchy of Life: 337-353; Amsterdam (Elsevier).
36. GAUTHIER, J., ESTES, R. & QUEIROZ, K. DE (1988a): A phylogenetic analysis of Lepidosauromorpha. - In: ESTES, R. & PREGILL, G. K. (Eds.): Phylogenetic Relationships of the Lizard Families. Essays Comemorating Charles L. Camp: 15-98; Stanford (Univ. Press).
37. GAUTHIER, J., KLUGE, A. G. & ROWE, T. (1988b): Amniote phylogeny and the importance of fossils. - Cladistic, 4: 105-209.
38. GEE, H. (2001a): Deep Time. Cladistics, the Revolution in Evolution. - 262 pp.; London (Fourth Estate).
39. GEE, H. (2001b): Deep time, paleontology and stamp collecting. Discussion with Paul Pearson. - Pal. Ass. Newsl., 47: 33-42.
40. GINGERICH, P. D. (1979): Stratophenetic approach to phylogeny reconstruction. - In: CRACRAFT, J. & ELDREDGE, N. (Eds.): Phylogenetic Analysis and Paleontology: 41-78; New York (Columbia Univ. Press).
41. GINGERICH, P. D. (1990): Stratophenetics. - In: BRIGGS, D. E. G. & CROWTHER, P. R. (Eds.): Palaeobiology: 437-442; Oxford (Blackwell).
42. GOLOBOFF, P. A. (1997): Self-weighted optimization: Tree searches and character state reconstructions under implied transformation. - Cladistics, 13: 225-245.
43. GRIFFITHS, G. C. D. (1974): On the foundations of biological systematics. - Acta Biotheor., 23: 85-131.
44. GRIFFITHS, G. C. D. (1976): The future of Linnean nomenclature. - Syst. Zool., 25: 168-173.
45. HARPER, C. W. (1976): Phylogenetic inference in paleontology. - J. Paleont., 50: 180-193.
46. HENDY, M. D. & PENNY, D. (1984): Cladograms should be called trees. - Syst. Zool., 33: 245-247.
47. HENNIG, W. (1950): Phylogenetische Systematik. - 380 pp.; Berlin (Zentralverlag).
48. HENNIG, W. (1966): Phylogenetic Systematics. - 263 pp.; Urbana (Univ. of Illinois Press).
49. HENNIG, W. (1969): Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten. - 436 pp.; Frankfurt (Kramer).
50. HENNIG, W. (1981): Insect Phylogeny. - 514 pp.; Chichester (John Wiley and Sons).
51. HENNIG, W. (1983): Stammesgeschichte der Chordaten. - Fortschr. Zool. Syst. Evolutforsch., 2: 1-208; Hamburg (Parey).
52. HILGENDORF, F. (1866): Über Planorbis multiformis im Steinheimer Süßwasserkalk. Ein Beispiel von Gestaltveränderung im Laufe der Zeit. - 36 pp.; Berlin (W. Weber).
53. HITCHIN, R. & BENTON, M. J. (1997): Congruence between parsimony and stratigraphy: comparison of three indices. - Paleobiology, 23: 20-32.
54. HOLLAND, S. M. (2000): The quality of the fossil record: A sequence stratigraphic perspective. - Paleobiology, 26 (suppl.): 148-168.
55. HULL, D. L. (1970): Contemporary systematic philosophies. - Ann. Rev. Ecol. System., 1: 19-53.
56. HULL, D. L. (1984): Cladistic theory: Hypotheses that blur and grow. - In: DUNCAN, T. & STUESSY, (Eds.): Cladistics: Perspectives on the Reconstruction of Evolutionary History: 5-23; New York (Columbia).
57. HULL, D. L. (1989): The evolution of phylogenetic systematics. - In: FERNHOLM, B., BREMER, K. & JÖRNWALL, H. (Eds.): The Hierarchy of Life: 3-15; Amsterdam (Elsevier).
58. HULL, D. L. (1988) Science as a Process. - 386 pp.; Chicago (Univ. Press).
59. KITCHING, I. J., FOREY, P. L., HUMPHRIES, C. J. & WILLIAMS, D. M. (1998): Cladistics. The Theory and Practice of Parsimony Analysis. - 228 pp.; Oxford (Univ. Press).
60. KLUGE, A. G. (1998): Total evidence or taxonomic congruence: cladistics or consensus classification. - Cladistics, 14: 151-158.
61. KORN, D. & REIF, W.-E. (in press): Problems of cladistics: From phylogeny to cladograms. - N. Jb. Geol. Paläont.; Stuttgart.
62. LAURIN, M. (1991): The osteology of a Lower Permian eosuchian from Texas and a review of diapsid phylogeny. - Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 101: 59-95.
63. LEE, M. S. Y. (1995): Species concepts and the recognition of ancestors. - Historical Biology, 10: 329-339.
64. LEE, M. S. Y. (1999): Stability of higher taxa in phylogenetic nomenclature - some comments on MOORE (1998). - Zool. Scripta, 28: 361-366.
65. LEVINTON, J. S. (2001): Genetics, Paleontology, and Macroevolution. - 2. ed., 617 pp.; Cambridge (Univ. Press).
66. LØVTRUP, S. (1975): On phylogenetic classification. - Acta Zool. Cracov., 20: 499-523.
67. LØVTRUP, S. (1977): The Phylogeny of Vertebrata. - 330 pp.; London (Wiley).
68. MAHNER, M. (1998): Warum es Evolution nur dann gibt, wenn Arten nicht evoluieren. - Theory Biosci., 117: 173-199.
69. MARTINS, E. P. (1999): Estimation of ancestral states of continuous characters: a computer simulation study. - Syst. Biol, 48: 642-650.
70. MAYR, E. (1974): Cladistic analysis or cladistic classification? - Z. zool. Syst. Evolut.-Forsch., 12: 94-128.
71. MCGHEE, G. R. (1998): Theoretical Morphology. The Concept and its Application. - 316 pp.; New York (Columbia Univ. Press).
72. MOORE, G. (1998): A comparison of traditional and phylogenetic nomenclature. - Taxon, 47: 561-579.
73. MOOERS, A. O., PAGE, R. C. M., PURVIS, A. & HARVEY, P. H. (1995): Phylogenetic noise leads to unbalanced cladistic tree reconstruction. - Syst. Zool., 44: 332-342.
74. MOOERS, A. O. & SCHLUTER, D. (1999): Reconstructing ancestor states with maximum likelihood: support for one- and two-rate models. - Syst. Biol., 48: 623-633.
75. NELSON, G. J. (1970): Outline of a theory of comparative biology. - Syst. Zool., 19: 373-384.
76. NELSON, G. J. (1973): Classification as an expression of phylogenetic relationships. - Syst. Zool., 22: 344-359.
77. NELSON, G. J. (1989): Cladistics and evolutionary models. - Cladistics, 5: 275-289.
78. NIXON, K. C. & CARPENTER, J. M. (2000): On the other "Phylogenetic Systematics". - Cladistics, 16: 298-318.
79. NORELL, M.A. (1992): Taxic origin and temporal diversity: the effect of phylogeny. - In: NOVACEK, M. J. & WHEELER, Q. (Eds.): Extinction and Phylogeny: 89-118; New York (Columbia Univ. Press).
80. NORELL, M.A. (1993): Tree-based approaches to understanding history: comments on ranks, rules, and the quality of the fossil record. - Amer. J. Sci., 293 A: 407-417.
81. NORELL, M.A. (1996): Ghost taxa, ancestors, and assumptions: a comment on WAGNER. - Paleobiology, 22: 453-455.
82. NORELL, M.A. (2001): Stratigraphic tests of cladistic hypotheses. - In: BRIGGS, D. E. G. & CROWTHER, P. R. (Eds.): Palaeobiology II: 519-522; Oxford (Blackwell).
83. NORELL, M. A. & NOVACEK, M. J. (1992a): The fossil record and evolution: Comparing cladistic and paleontologic evidence for vertebrate evolution. - Science, 255: 1690-1693.
84. NORELL, M. A. (1992b): Congruence between superpositional and phylogenetic patterns: comparing cladistic patterns with fossil records. - Cladistics, 8: 319-338.
85. NOVACEK, M. J. (1992): Fossils as critical data for phylogeny. - In: NOVACEK, M. J. & WHEELER, Q. (Eds.): Extinction and Phylogeny: 46-88; New York (Columbia Univ. Press).
86. OMLAND, K. E. (1999): The assumptions and challenges of ancestral state. - Syst. Biol., 48: 604-611.
87. PAGEL, M. (1999): The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. - Syst. Biol., 48: 612-622.
88. PATTERSON, C. (1989): Phylogenetic relations of major groups: Conclusions and prospects. - In: FERNHOLM, B., BREMER, K. & JÖRNWALL, H. (Eds.): The Hierarchy of Life: 471-488; Amsterdam (Elsevier).
89. PATTERSON, C. & ROSEN, D. E. (1977): Review of ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. - Bull. Amer. Mus. Natur. Hist., 158: 81-172.
90. PAUL, C. R. C. (1992): The recognition of ancestors. - Historical Biology, 6: 239-250.
91. PAUL, C. R. C. (1998): Adequacy, completeness and the fossil record. - In: DONOVAN, S. K. & PAUL, C. R. C. (Eds.): The Adequacy of the Fossil Record: 1-22; Chichester (Wiley).
92. PAUL, C. R. C. & DONOVAN, S. K. (1998): An overview of the completeness of the fossil record. - In: DONOVAN, K. S. & PAUL, C. R. C. (Eds.): The Adequacy of the Fossil Record: 111-131; Chichester (Wiley).
93. PEARSON, P. (2000): Review of GEE, H. "Deep Time". - Pal. Ass. Newsl., 44: 20.
94. PEARSON, P. (2001); Deep Time, palaeontology and stamp collecting, discussion with H. GEE. - Pal. Ass. Newsl., 47: 33-42.
95. PLATNICK, N. I. (1989): Cladistics and phylogenetic analysis today. - In: FERNHOLM, B., BREMER, K. & JÖRNWALL, H. (Eds.): The Hierarchy of Life: 17-24; Amsterdam (Elsevier).
96. QUEIROZ, K. DE (1987): Phylogenetic systematics of iguanine lizards. A comparative osteological study. - Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool., 118: 1-203.
97. QUEIROZ, K. DE (1997): The Linnean hierarchy and the evolutionization of taxonomy, with emphasis on the problems of nomenclature. - Aliso, 15: 125-144.
98. QUEIROZ, K. DE (2000): Logical problems associated with including and excluding characters during tree reconstruction and their implications for the study of morphological evolution. - In: WIENS, J. J. (Ed.): Phylogenetic Analysis of Morphological Data, Washington: 192-212; (Smithsonian Inst.).
99. QUEIROZ, K. DE & DONOGHUE, M. J. (1990): Phylogenetic systematics or NELSON'S version of cladistics? - Cladistics, 6: 61-75.
100. QUEIROZ, K. DE & GAUTHIER, J. (1990): Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: phylogenetic definition of taxon names. - Syst. Zool., 39: 307-322.
101. QUEIROZ, K. DE (1992): Phylogenetic taxonomy. - Ann. Rev. Ecol. Systematics, 23: 449-480.
102. QUEIROZ, K. DE (1994): Towards a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. - Trends Ecol. Evol., 9: 27-31.
103. RASNITSYN, A. P. (2000): Testing cladograms by fossil record: the ghost range test. - Contrib. Zool. 69: URL: http://logos.uba.uva.nl/ctz/vol69/nr04/03.
104. REIF, W.-E. (1983a): HILGENDORFS (1863) dissertation on the Steinheim planorbids (Gastropoda; Miocene); The development of a phylogenetic research program for Paleontology. - Paläont. Z., 57: 7-20.
105. REIF, W.-E. (1983b): The Steinheim snails (Miocene, Schwäbische Alb) from a Neo-Darwinian point of view: A discussion. - Paläont. Z., 57: 21-26.
106. REIF, W.-E. (1985): Endemic evolution of Gyraulus kleini in the meteorite crater of Steinheim. - In: BAYER, U. & SEILACHER, A. (Eds.) Sedimentary and Evolutionary Cycles: 256-294; Berlin (Springer).
107. REIF, W.-E. (2002) Evolution of organ systems: Phylogeny, function and reciprocal illumination. - Senckenberg. leth., 82: 357-367.
108. REIF, W.-E. (in press a): The primacy of morphology: pattern cladism, idealistic mophology, and evolution. - N. Jb. Geol. Paläont.
109. REIF, W.-E. (in press b): One-dimensional cladistics: The logics of the cladograms. - N. Jb. Geol. Paläont.
110. REIF, W.-E. (in press c): Problems of cladistics: 2. The Hennigian species concept. - N. Jb. Geol, Paläont.
111. RIEPPEL, O. (1999): Einführung in die computergestützte Kladistik. - 122 pp.; München (F. Pfeil).
112. ROWE, T. (1988): Definition, diagnosis, and the origin of mammalia. - J. Vert. Paleont., 8: 241-264.
113. SCHANDER, C. & THOLLESON, M. (1995): Phylogenetic taxonomy - some comments. - Zool. Scripta, 24: 263-268.
114. SCHOCH, R. M. (1986): Phylogeny Reconstruction in Paleontology. - 352 pp.; New York (Van Nostrand Reinhold).
115. SCOTLAND, R. W., SIEBERT, D. J. & WILLIAMS, D. M. (Eds., 1994): Models in Phylogeny Reconstruction; Oxford (Clarendon Press).
116. SCOTT-RAM, N. R (1990): Transformed Cladistics, Taxonomy and Evolution. - 238 pp.; Cambridge (Cambridge Univ. Press).
117. SERENO, P. C. (1998): A rationale for phylogenetic definitions, with applications to the higher-level taxonomy of Dinosauria. - N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh., 210: 41-85.
118. SIDDALL, M. E. (1998): Stratigraphic fit to phylogenies. A proposed solution. - Cladistics, 14: 201-208.
119. SMITH, A. B. (1994): Systematics and the Fossil Record. Documenting Evolutionary Patterns. - 223 pp.; Oxford (Blackwell).
120. SMITH, A. B. & LITTLEWOOD, D. T. J. (1994): Paleontological data and molecular phylogenetic analysis. - Paleobiology, 20: 259-273.
121. SOBER, E. (1988): Reconstructing the Past. Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference. - 287 pp.; Cambridge, Mass. (MIT-Press).
122. SUDHAUS, W. & REHFELD, K. (1992): Einführung in die Phylogenetik und Systematik. - 241 pp.; Stuttgart (Gustav Fischer).
123. SWOFFORD, D. L. & MADDISON, W. P. (1987): Reconstructing ancestral character states and WAGNER parsimony. - Mathematical Biosciences, 87: 199-229.
124. TEMPLETON, A. R. (1989): The meaning of species and speciation: A genetic perspective. - In: OTTE, D. & ENDLER, J. A. (Eds.): Speciation and its Consequences: 3-27; Sunderland, Mass. (Sinauer).
125. VALEN, L. VAN (1978): Why not to be a cladist. - Evolut. Theory, 3: 285-299.
126. WÄGELE, J.-W. (2000): Grundlagen der Phylogenetischen Systematik. - 315 pp.; München (F. Pfeil).
127. WAGNER, P. J. (1995): Stratigraphic tests of cladistic hypotheses. - Paleobiology, 21: 153-178.
128. WAGNER, P. J. (1998a): A likelihood approach for evaluating estimates of phylogenetic relationships among fossil taxa. - Paleobiology, 24: 430-449.
129. WAGNER, P. J. (1998b): Phylogenetic analyses and the quality of the fossil record. - In: DONOVAN, K. S. & PAUL, C. R. C. (Eds.): The Adequacy of the Fossil Record: 165-187; Chichester (Wiley).
130. WAGNER, P. J. (1999): The utility of fossil data in phylogenetic analyses: a likelihood example using Ordovician-Silurian species of the Lophospiridae (Gastropoda: Murchinsoniina). - Amer. Malacol. Bull., 15: 1-33.
131. WAGNER, P. J. (2000a): Likelihood tests of hypothesized durations: determining and accomodating biasing factors. - Paleobiology, 26: 431-449.
132. WAGNER, P. J. (2000b): The quality of the fossil record and the accuracy of phylogenetic inferences about sampling and diversity. - System. Biol., 49: 65-85.
133. WAGNER, P. J. (2000c): Exhaustion of morphological character states among fossil taxa. - Evolution, 54: 365-386.
134. WAGNER, P. J. (2000d): Phylogenetic analyses and the fossil record: tests and inferences, hypotheses and models. - Paleobiology, 26 (Suppl.): 341-371.
135. WHEELER, W. (2000): Heuristic reconstruction of hypothetical-ancestral DNA sequences: sequence alignment vs. direct optimization. - In: SCOTLAND, R. & PENNINGTON, R. T. (Eds.): Homology and Systematics. Coding Characters for Phylogenetic Analysis: 106-113; London (Taylor & Francis).